USE OF FORCE: CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PROHIBITION OF ITS USE AND THE VALIDITY OF PREVENTIVE SELF-DEFENSE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FIGHT AGAINST ORGANIZED TERRORISM?
The author analyzes the prevailing regulation on the use of force, from the perspective of Article 51 of the UN Charter related to the general prohibition of Article 2.4 UN Charter, with special emphasis on the existing doctrinal conflict due to the interpretive duality of the above-mentioned Articl...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Academia Nacional de Estudios Políticos y Estratégicos
2017-09-01
|
Series: | Política y Estrategia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.politicayestrategia.cl/index.php/rpye/article/view/71 |
_version_ | 1818588886872358912 |
---|---|
author | MATÍAS DUTRA CETUSIC |
author_facet | MATÍAS DUTRA CETUSIC |
author_sort | MATÍAS DUTRA CETUSIC |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The author analyzes the prevailing regulation on the use of force, from the perspective of Article 51 of the UN Charter related to the general prohibition of Article 2.4 UN Charter, with special emphasis on the existing doctrinal conflict due to the interpretive duality of the above-mentioned Article 51 C, offering an approach to the problem. In that regard, the theories that justify unilateral anticipatory modalities in the fightagainst organized terrorism are confronted, in order to eventually findsupport in the customary law of the inherent right to self-defense. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-16T09:31:53Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-0651ca9c01ce4202bdef01f96ff87999 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0716-7415 0719-8027 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-16T09:31:53Z |
publishDate | 2017-09-01 |
publisher | Academia Nacional de Estudios Políticos y Estratégicos |
record_format | Article |
series | Política y Estrategia |
spelling | doaj.art-0651ca9c01ce4202bdef01f96ff879992022-12-21T22:36:30ZengAcademia Nacional de Estudios Políticos y EstratégicosPolítica y Estrategia0716-74150719-80272017-09-010129458710.26797/rpye.v0i129.7162USE OF FORCE: CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PROHIBITION OF ITS USE AND THE VALIDITY OF PREVENTIVE SELF-DEFENSE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FIGHT AGAINST ORGANIZED TERRORISM?MATÍAS DUTRA CETUSIC0Universidad Alberto HurtadoThe author analyzes the prevailing regulation on the use of force, from the perspective of Article 51 of the UN Charter related to the general prohibition of Article 2.4 UN Charter, with special emphasis on the existing doctrinal conflict due to the interpretive duality of the above-mentioned Article 51 C, offering an approach to the problem. In that regard, the theories that justify unilateral anticipatory modalities in the fightagainst organized terrorism are confronted, in order to eventually findsupport in the customary law of the inherent right to self-defense.http://www.politicayestrategia.cl/index.php/rpye/article/view/71Uso de la fuerzalegítima defensa,Artículo 51legítima defensa anticipatoriaguerra preventivaterrorismo |
spellingShingle | MATÍAS DUTRA CETUSIC USE OF FORCE: CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PROHIBITION OF ITS USE AND THE VALIDITY OF PREVENTIVE SELF-DEFENSE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FIGHT AGAINST ORGANIZED TERRORISM? Política y Estrategia Uso de la fuerza legítima defensa, Artículo 51 legítima defensa anticipatoria guerra preventiva terrorismo |
title | USE OF FORCE: CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PROHIBITION OF ITS USE AND THE VALIDITY OF PREVENTIVE SELF-DEFENSE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FIGHT AGAINST ORGANIZED TERRORISM? |
title_full | USE OF FORCE: CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PROHIBITION OF ITS USE AND THE VALIDITY OF PREVENTIVE SELF-DEFENSE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FIGHT AGAINST ORGANIZED TERRORISM? |
title_fullStr | USE OF FORCE: CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PROHIBITION OF ITS USE AND THE VALIDITY OF PREVENTIVE SELF-DEFENSE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FIGHT AGAINST ORGANIZED TERRORISM? |
title_full_unstemmed | USE OF FORCE: CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PROHIBITION OF ITS USE AND THE VALIDITY OF PREVENTIVE SELF-DEFENSE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FIGHT AGAINST ORGANIZED TERRORISM? |
title_short | USE OF FORCE: CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PROHIBITION OF ITS USE AND THE VALIDITY OF PREVENTIVE SELF-DEFENSE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FIGHT AGAINST ORGANIZED TERRORISM? |
title_sort | use of force conflict between the prohibition of its use and the validity of preventive self defense in the context of the fight against organized terrorism |
topic | Uso de la fuerza legítima defensa, Artículo 51 legítima defensa anticipatoria guerra preventiva terrorismo |
url | http://www.politicayestrategia.cl/index.php/rpye/article/view/71 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matiasdutracetusic useofforceconflictbetweentheprohibitionofitsuseandthevalidityofpreventiveselfdefenseinthecontextofthefightagainstorganizedterrorism |