USE OF FORCE: CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PROHIBITION OF ITS USE AND THE VALIDITY OF PREVENTIVE SELF-DEFENSE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FIGHT AGAINST ORGANIZED TERRORISM?

The author analyzes the prevailing regulation on the use of force, from the perspective of Article 51 of the UN Charter related to the general prohibition of Article 2.4 UN Charter, with special emphasis on the existing doctrinal conflict due to the interpretive duality of the above-mentioned Articl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: MATÍAS DUTRA CETUSIC
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Academia Nacional de Estudios Políticos y Estratégicos 2017-09-01
Series:Política y Estrategia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.politicayestrategia.cl/index.php/rpye/article/view/71
_version_ 1818588886872358912
author MATÍAS DUTRA CETUSIC
author_facet MATÍAS DUTRA CETUSIC
author_sort MATÍAS DUTRA CETUSIC
collection DOAJ
description The author analyzes the prevailing regulation on the use of force, from the perspective of Article 51 of the UN Charter related to the general prohibition of Article 2.4 UN Charter, with special emphasis on the existing doctrinal conflict due to the interpretive duality of the above-mentioned Article 51 C, offering an approach to the problem. In that regard, the theories that justify unilateral anticipatory modalities in the fightagainst organized terrorism are confronted, in order to eventually findsupport in the customary law of the inherent right to self-defense.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T09:31:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0651ca9c01ce4202bdef01f96ff87999
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0716-7415
0719-8027
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T09:31:53Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher Academia Nacional de Estudios Políticos y Estratégicos
record_format Article
series Política y Estrategia
spelling doaj.art-0651ca9c01ce4202bdef01f96ff879992022-12-21T22:36:30ZengAcademia Nacional de Estudios Políticos y EstratégicosPolítica y Estrategia0716-74150719-80272017-09-010129458710.26797/rpye.v0i129.7162USE OF FORCE: CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PROHIBITION OF ITS USE AND THE VALIDITY OF PREVENTIVE SELF-DEFENSE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FIGHT AGAINST ORGANIZED TERRORISM?MATÍAS DUTRA CETUSIC0Universidad Alberto HurtadoThe author analyzes the prevailing regulation on the use of force, from the perspective of Article 51 of the UN Charter related to the general prohibition of Article 2.4 UN Charter, with special emphasis on the existing doctrinal conflict due to the interpretive duality of the above-mentioned Article 51 C, offering an approach to the problem. In that regard, the theories that justify unilateral anticipatory modalities in the fightagainst organized terrorism are confronted, in order to eventually findsupport in the customary law of the inherent right to self-defense.http://www.politicayestrategia.cl/index.php/rpye/article/view/71Uso de la fuerzalegítima defensa,Artículo 51legítima defensa anticipatoriaguerra preventivaterrorismo
spellingShingle MATÍAS DUTRA CETUSIC
USE OF FORCE: CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PROHIBITION OF ITS USE AND THE VALIDITY OF PREVENTIVE SELF-DEFENSE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FIGHT AGAINST ORGANIZED TERRORISM?
Política y Estrategia
Uso de la fuerza
legítima defensa,
Artículo 51
legítima defensa anticipatoria
guerra preventiva
terrorismo
title USE OF FORCE: CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PROHIBITION OF ITS USE AND THE VALIDITY OF PREVENTIVE SELF-DEFENSE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FIGHT AGAINST ORGANIZED TERRORISM?
title_full USE OF FORCE: CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PROHIBITION OF ITS USE AND THE VALIDITY OF PREVENTIVE SELF-DEFENSE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FIGHT AGAINST ORGANIZED TERRORISM?
title_fullStr USE OF FORCE: CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PROHIBITION OF ITS USE AND THE VALIDITY OF PREVENTIVE SELF-DEFENSE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FIGHT AGAINST ORGANIZED TERRORISM?
title_full_unstemmed USE OF FORCE: CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PROHIBITION OF ITS USE AND THE VALIDITY OF PREVENTIVE SELF-DEFENSE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FIGHT AGAINST ORGANIZED TERRORISM?
title_short USE OF FORCE: CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PROHIBITION OF ITS USE AND THE VALIDITY OF PREVENTIVE SELF-DEFENSE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FIGHT AGAINST ORGANIZED TERRORISM?
title_sort use of force conflict between the prohibition of its use and the validity of preventive self defense in the context of the fight against organized terrorism
topic Uso de la fuerza
legítima defensa,
Artículo 51
legítima defensa anticipatoria
guerra preventiva
terrorismo
url http://www.politicayestrategia.cl/index.php/rpye/article/view/71
work_keys_str_mv AT matiasdutracetusic useofforceconflictbetweentheprohibitionofitsuseandthevalidityofpreventiveselfdefenseinthecontextofthefightagainstorganizedterrorism