Diagnostic performance of circular RNAs in human cancers: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract Background Recently, accumulating evidence have revealed that circular RNA (circRNA) was deregulated in multiple types of cancer, suggesting that circRNA might serve as a novel candidate biomarker of cancer diagnosis. However, inconsistent results have become an obstacle in applying circRNA...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juan Li, Hang Li, Xiaoting Lv, Zitai Yang, Min Gao, Yanhong Bi, Ziwei Zhang, Shengli Wang, Zhigang Cui, Baosen Zhou, Zhihua Yin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-07-01
Series:Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.749
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Recently, accumulating evidence have revealed that circular RNA (circRNA) was deregulated in multiple types of cancer, suggesting that circRNA might serve as a novel candidate biomarker of cancer diagnosis. However, inconsistent results have become an obstacle in applying circRNAs to clinical practice. The aim of this study is to evaluate diagnostic value of circRNAs among cancers. Methods A literature search was systematically performed among PubMed, Sciencedirect, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases up to February 15, 2019. The pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratios, negative likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the SROC curve (AUC) were applied to evaluate diagnostic performance of circRNAs. Results In total, the study included 64 studies with single circRNA and 13 studies with combined circRNAs. Overall, the study presented that a single circRNA had moderate diagnostic value, with a SEN of 0.75, a SPE of 0.76, and an AUC of 0.82. The plasma circRNAs had higher diagnostic accuracy than tissue (AUC: 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83–0.89 for plasma/serum subgroup; AUC: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.75–0.82 for tissue subgroup). Furthermore, the combined circRNAs had good diagnostic efficacy for GC, with a SEN of 0.89, a SPE of 0.94, and an AUC of 0.97, respectively. Conclusion This study confirmed that circRNAs may be candidate biomarkers for cancer diagnosis. In particular, diagnosis of combined circRNAs will be a new alternative applied to clinical research and practice for cancer.
ISSN:2324-9269