SOCIAL VULNERABILITY AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE-RELATED MORTALITY IN OLDER ADULT, 2016-2020

Therapeutic Area: ASCVD/CVD in Special Populations Background: Association between socioeconomic status and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) is well-documented. Racial disparities in prevalence and outcomes of CVD have also been extensively studied. The intersection of income, race, and CVD is relative...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas, MD, Khawaja M. Talha, MD, Michael Shapiro, MD, Vijay Nambi, MD, PhD, Salim S. Virani, MD, Anurag Mehta, MD, Dmitry Abramov, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-09-01
Series:American Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667723001009
_version_ 1797676529210097664
author Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas, MD
Khawaja M. Talha, MD
Michael Shapiro, MD
Vijay Nambi, MD, PhD
Salim S. Virani, MD
Anurag Mehta, MD
Dmitry Abramov, MD
author_facet Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas, MD
Khawaja M. Talha, MD
Michael Shapiro, MD
Vijay Nambi, MD, PhD
Salim S. Virani, MD
Anurag Mehta, MD
Dmitry Abramov, MD
author_sort Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas, MD
collection DOAJ
description Therapeutic Area: ASCVD/CVD in Special Populations Background: Association between socioeconomic status and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) is well-documented. Racial disparities in prevalence and outcomes of CVD have also been extensively studied. The intersection of income, race, and CVD is relatively underexplored. Hence, we aimed to study the prevalence of CVD and associated risk factors among different races/ethnicities across different income groups. Methods: This retrospective analysis included data from participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2005-2018. Adults ≥20 years who identified as non-Hispanic (NH) White, NH Black, or Hispanic (Mexican-American and other Hispanics) were included. Family income to poverty ratio (PIR) was calculated by dividing family (or individual) income by poverty guidelines specific to the survey year and used as a measure of socioeconomic status. The participants were divided into four quartiles based on PIR <1.08 (lowest income), 1.09-2.03, 2.04-3.9, and >3.9 (highest income). Weighted logistic regression was performed to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to determine the association of race/ethnicity and CVD and associated risk factors in each quartile. Models were adjusted for age, sex, race, health insurance, marital status, citizenship status, and level of education and PIR. Results: We included 31,884 unweighted participants that corresponded to 191,307,167 weighted, nationally representative participants. Of these, 8,009 (weighted 16.3%), 7,967 (weighted 19.2%), 7,944 (weighted 26.9%), and 7,964 (weighted 37.5%) participants belonged to 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartiles respectively. The proportion of NH-Whites increased with increasing PIR quartiles whereas the proportion of NH-Blacks and Hispanics decreased with increasing PIR quartiles. In adjusted analyses, the prevalence odds of diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, coronary artery disease (CAD), congestive heart failure (CHF), and stroke decreased in a step-wise manner from 1st to 4th PIR quartile. Overall, NH Blacks had higher prevalence odds of DM, hypertension, obesity, CHF, and stroke compared to NH Whites, whereas NH Whites had higher prevalence odds of CAD and dyslipidemia compared to NH Blacks (Figure 1). The model testing for PIR-race/ethnicity interaction revealed that PIR-race/ethnicity interaction was significant for obesity (P-interaction 0.002) and diabetes mellitus (P-interaction 0.027) (Figure 2). The difference in prevalence odds between NH White adults and NH Black adults was greater for obesity and diabetes mellitus in the highest PIR quartile compared to the lowest PIR quartile. PIR-race/ethnicity interaction for stroke was 0.053 with the difference in prevalence odds between NH White adults and NH Black adults being greater in the higher PIR quartiles compared to the lowest PIR quartile. Conclusions: The difference in prevalence between NH White and NH Black adults was greater for diabetes mellitus, obesity and stroke in the highest PIR quartile compared to the lowest PIR quartile. These data suggest a complex interplay between race/ethnicities and income inequalities resulting in disparities in CVD.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T22:30:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-066703d855d349af8a0ca973bbbb747f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-6677
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T22:30:31Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series American Journal of Preventive Cardiology
spelling doaj.art-066703d855d349af8a0ca973bbbb747f2023-09-23T05:13:02ZengElsevierAmerican Journal of Preventive Cardiology2666-66772023-09-0115100559SOCIAL VULNERABILITY AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE-RELATED MORTALITY IN OLDER ADULT, 2016-2020Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas, MDKhawaja M. Talha, MDMichael Shapiro, MDVijay Nambi, MD, PhDSalim S. Virani, MDAnurag Mehta, MDDmitry Abramov, MDTherapeutic Area: ASCVD/CVD in Special Populations Background: Association between socioeconomic status and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) is well-documented. Racial disparities in prevalence and outcomes of CVD have also been extensively studied. The intersection of income, race, and CVD is relatively underexplored. Hence, we aimed to study the prevalence of CVD and associated risk factors among different races/ethnicities across different income groups. Methods: This retrospective analysis included data from participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2005-2018. Adults ≥20 years who identified as non-Hispanic (NH) White, NH Black, or Hispanic (Mexican-American and other Hispanics) were included. Family income to poverty ratio (PIR) was calculated by dividing family (or individual) income by poverty guidelines specific to the survey year and used as a measure of socioeconomic status. The participants were divided into four quartiles based on PIR <1.08 (lowest income), 1.09-2.03, 2.04-3.9, and >3.9 (highest income). Weighted logistic regression was performed to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to determine the association of race/ethnicity and CVD and associated risk factors in each quartile. Models were adjusted for age, sex, race, health insurance, marital status, citizenship status, and level of education and PIR. Results: We included 31,884 unweighted participants that corresponded to 191,307,167 weighted, nationally representative participants. Of these, 8,009 (weighted 16.3%), 7,967 (weighted 19.2%), 7,944 (weighted 26.9%), and 7,964 (weighted 37.5%) participants belonged to 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartiles respectively. The proportion of NH-Whites increased with increasing PIR quartiles whereas the proportion of NH-Blacks and Hispanics decreased with increasing PIR quartiles. In adjusted analyses, the prevalence odds of diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, coronary artery disease (CAD), congestive heart failure (CHF), and stroke decreased in a step-wise manner from 1st to 4th PIR quartile. Overall, NH Blacks had higher prevalence odds of DM, hypertension, obesity, CHF, and stroke compared to NH Whites, whereas NH Whites had higher prevalence odds of CAD and dyslipidemia compared to NH Blacks (Figure 1). The model testing for PIR-race/ethnicity interaction revealed that PIR-race/ethnicity interaction was significant for obesity (P-interaction 0.002) and diabetes mellitus (P-interaction 0.027) (Figure 2). The difference in prevalence odds between NH White adults and NH Black adults was greater for obesity and diabetes mellitus in the highest PIR quartile compared to the lowest PIR quartile. PIR-race/ethnicity interaction for stroke was 0.053 with the difference in prevalence odds between NH White adults and NH Black adults being greater in the higher PIR quartiles compared to the lowest PIR quartile. Conclusions: The difference in prevalence between NH White and NH Black adults was greater for diabetes mellitus, obesity and stroke in the highest PIR quartile compared to the lowest PIR quartile. These data suggest a complex interplay between race/ethnicities and income inequalities resulting in disparities in CVD.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667723001009
spellingShingle Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas, MD
Khawaja M. Talha, MD
Michael Shapiro, MD
Vijay Nambi, MD, PhD
Salim S. Virani, MD
Anurag Mehta, MD
Dmitry Abramov, MD
SOCIAL VULNERABILITY AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE-RELATED MORTALITY IN OLDER ADULT, 2016-2020
American Journal of Preventive Cardiology
title SOCIAL VULNERABILITY AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE-RELATED MORTALITY IN OLDER ADULT, 2016-2020
title_full SOCIAL VULNERABILITY AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE-RELATED MORTALITY IN OLDER ADULT, 2016-2020
title_fullStr SOCIAL VULNERABILITY AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE-RELATED MORTALITY IN OLDER ADULT, 2016-2020
title_full_unstemmed SOCIAL VULNERABILITY AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE-RELATED MORTALITY IN OLDER ADULT, 2016-2020
title_short SOCIAL VULNERABILITY AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE-RELATED MORTALITY IN OLDER ADULT, 2016-2020
title_sort social vulnerability and cardiovascular disease related mortality in older adult 2016 2020
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667723001009
work_keys_str_mv AT abdulmannankhanminhasmd socialvulnerabilityandcardiovasculardiseaserelatedmortalityinolderadult20162020
AT khawajamtalhamd socialvulnerabilityandcardiovasculardiseaserelatedmortalityinolderadult20162020
AT michaelshapiromd socialvulnerabilityandcardiovasculardiseaserelatedmortalityinolderadult20162020
AT vijaynambimdphd socialvulnerabilityandcardiovasculardiseaserelatedmortalityinolderadult20162020
AT salimsviranimd socialvulnerabilityandcardiovasculardiseaserelatedmortalityinolderadult20162020
AT anuragmehtamd socialvulnerabilityandcardiovasculardiseaserelatedmortalityinolderadult20162020
AT dmitryabramovmd socialvulnerabilityandcardiovasculardiseaserelatedmortalityinolderadult20162020