Establishing a Uniform Practice through Interpretation of International Convention on Carriage of Goods by Sea

< p >Rotterdam Rules by expanding the jurisdiction and arbitration scope, took an important step towards the unified application of international rules governing the Carriage of Goods by Sea. At the same time, the extended scope of competent authority in this Convention to hear a case by diffe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amir Sadeghi Neshat, Hadi Mashhadi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Allameh Tabataba'i University Press 2020-05-01
Series:Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_11613_19544d30b69e634bac26595bc2a998e8.pdf
_version_ 1797375775911968768
author Amir Sadeghi Neshat
Hadi Mashhadi
author_facet Amir Sadeghi Neshat
Hadi Mashhadi
author_sort Amir Sadeghi Neshat
collection DOAJ
description < p >Rotterdam Rules by expanding the jurisdiction and arbitration scope, took an important step towards the unified application of international rules governing the Carriage of Goods by Sea. At the same time, the extended scope of competent authority in this Convention to hear a case by different and numerous authorities would bring divergent interpretations while they are still valid interpretations of international rules. Therefore it may defeat the main purpose of codification of international conventions supported in Rotterdam Rules. In this regard, the interpretation of international rules by national authorities gains the utmost importance in unification of international rules. The question is that whether national authorities in the judicial process are obligated to apply the rules codified in international conventions? Or when parties to a dispute have expressed their mutual consent on the applicability of a specific rule, can national authorities disregard international rules or can they set aside the agreement of the parties to a dispute? It seems that the prior development of domestic law is crucial to unified application on international rules governing the Carriage of Goods by Sea and this is possible only through interpretation of international conventions in its own framework.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T19:29:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-067a3ad90205408d8235ec48f31d274a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2345-3583
2476-6232
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-08T19:29:06Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
record_format Article
series Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī
spelling doaj.art-067a3ad90205408d8235ec48f31d274a2023-12-26T07:48:51ZfasAllameh Tabataba'i University PressFaṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī2345-35832476-62322020-05-0183013115111613Establishing a Uniform Practice through Interpretation of International Convention on Carriage of Goods by SeaAmir Sadeghi Neshat0Hadi Mashhadi1Associate Professor, Private Law, of Tehran University, Tehran, IranPhD Candidate of Civil Law, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran< p >Rotterdam Rules by expanding the jurisdiction and arbitration scope, took an important step towards the unified application of international rules governing the Carriage of Goods by Sea. At the same time, the extended scope of competent authority in this Convention to hear a case by different and numerous authorities would bring divergent interpretations while they are still valid interpretations of international rules. Therefore it may defeat the main purpose of codification of international conventions supported in Rotterdam Rules. In this regard, the interpretation of international rules by national authorities gains the utmost importance in unification of international rules. The question is that whether national authorities in the judicial process are obligated to apply the rules codified in international conventions? Or when parties to a dispute have expressed their mutual consent on the applicability of a specific rule, can national authorities disregard international rules or can they set aside the agreement of the parties to a dispute? It seems that the prior development of domestic law is crucial to unified application on international rules governing the Carriage of Goods by Sea and this is possible only through interpretation of international conventions in its own framework.https://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_11613_19544d30b69e634bac26595bc2a998e8.pdfrotterdam conventionscarriage of goods by seainterpretation of international rulesapplication of international rulesarbitration
spellingShingle Amir Sadeghi Neshat
Hadi Mashhadi
Establishing a Uniform Practice through Interpretation of International Convention on Carriage of Goods by Sea
Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī
rotterdam conventions
carriage of goods by sea
interpretation of international rules
application of international rules
arbitration
title Establishing a Uniform Practice through Interpretation of International Convention on Carriage of Goods by Sea
title_full Establishing a Uniform Practice through Interpretation of International Convention on Carriage of Goods by Sea
title_fullStr Establishing a Uniform Practice through Interpretation of International Convention on Carriage of Goods by Sea
title_full_unstemmed Establishing a Uniform Practice through Interpretation of International Convention on Carriage of Goods by Sea
title_short Establishing a Uniform Practice through Interpretation of International Convention on Carriage of Goods by Sea
title_sort establishing a uniform practice through interpretation of international convention on carriage of goods by sea
topic rotterdam conventions
carriage of goods by sea
interpretation of international rules
application of international rules
arbitration
url https://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_11613_19544d30b69e634bac26595bc2a998e8.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT amirsadeghineshat establishingauniformpracticethroughinterpretationofinternationalconventiononcarriageofgoodsbysea
AT hadimashhadi establishingauniformpracticethroughinterpretationofinternationalconventiononcarriageofgoodsbysea