| Summary: | In the Constitution and some ordinary laws of Iran, the issue of the absolute prohibition of all instances of torture has been raised. In addition to domestic law, international law has also focused on torture, andinternational human rights instruments, including the 1984 Convention against Torture, have made this actunethical Contrary to human dignity, it is emphasized that it is necessary to mention this issue that therelated domestic laws of Iran, in addition to the definition and explanation of cases of torture, have not beenmentioned, but the conflict or significant differences between Iranian law and international human rightsinstruments In particular, the Convention on the Prohibition of Torture, as the main instrument ofinternational law The United Nations Convention on the Prohibition of Torture The present study, which is adescriptive-analytical method written through scamming and using library resources, examines theimplementation of torture bans in Iran and compares them with international human rights instruments andtreaties and, in the end, The result is that my guarantees of torture in Iran are inadequate in comparisonwith international documents and treaties and is one of the main problems in the total prohibition of torturecases in Iran.
|
|---|