Effect of fluoroscopy frame rate on radiation exposure and in‐hospital outcomes in three‐dimensional electroanatomic mapping guided procedures
Abstract Background Fluoroscopic imaging involves exposure of the patients and the laboratory staff to ionizing radiation. One of the strategies that reduce such exposure in an electrophysiology laboratory is using a three‐dimensional electroanatomic mapping (3D EAM) system for performing these proc...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-02-01
|
Series: | Journal of Arrhythmia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12496 |
_version_ | 1818620441700335616 |
---|---|
author | Muzaffar Ali Deepak Padmanabhan Khalil Kanjwal Milan Kumar Ghadei Anju Kottayan Bharatraj Banavalikar Jayaprakash Shenthar |
author_facet | Muzaffar Ali Deepak Padmanabhan Khalil Kanjwal Milan Kumar Ghadei Anju Kottayan Bharatraj Banavalikar Jayaprakash Shenthar |
author_sort | Muzaffar Ali |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Fluoroscopic imaging involves exposure of the patients and the laboratory staff to ionizing radiation. One of the strategies that reduce such exposure in an electrophysiology laboratory is using a three‐dimensional electroanatomic mapping (3D EAM) system for performing these procedures. In this analysis, we have analyzed the effect of fluoroscopy frame rate on the radiation exposure and in‐hospital outcomes in ablation procedures performed under 3D EAM guidance. Methods We retrospectively analyzed all the ablation procedures performed under 3D EAM guidance at our institute from September 2015 to December 2018. The procedures were divided into two groups based on whether the procedures were performed before (pre) or after (post) January 26, 2018. After January 2018, fluoroscopy was used at a frame rate of 3.75 frames per second (fps). Radiation exposure indices and in‐hospital outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results Ablation procedures included in the analysis were ventricular arrhythmias (n = 192), atrial flutter (115), atrial tachycardia (AT) (43), and atrial fibrillation (AF) (30). Over the study period, there was a significant reduction in procedure time, fluoroscopy time, dose area product, and effective dose (ED) (P < .001). Except for AT and AF ablation procedures, there was a significant reduction in the radiation exposure indices when the “post” group was compared with the “pre” group (P ≤ .02). The decrease in the frame rate had no significant effect on in‐hospital outcomes. Conclusion The use of 3D EAM combined with decreasing the fluoroscopy frame rate significantly reduced the total radiation exposure without adversely affecting in‐hospital outcomes. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-16T17:53:26Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-068ff5c82dee4776b9d3607806b3eac1 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1880-4276 1883-2148 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-16T17:53:26Z |
publishDate | 2021-02-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Arrhythmia |
spelling | doaj.art-068ff5c82dee4776b9d3607806b3eac12022-12-21T22:22:13ZengWileyJournal of Arrhythmia1880-42761883-21482021-02-013719710210.1002/joa3.12496Effect of fluoroscopy frame rate on radiation exposure and in‐hospital outcomes in three‐dimensional electroanatomic mapping guided proceduresMuzaffar Ali0Deepak Padmanabhan1Khalil Kanjwal2Milan Kumar Ghadei3Anju Kottayan4Bharatraj Banavalikar5Jayaprakash Shenthar6Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research Bangalore IndiaDepartment of Cardiac Electrophysiology Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research Bangalore IndiaDepartment of Cardiology Division of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology McLaren Greater Lansing Hospital Lansing MI USADepartment of Cardiac Electrophysiology Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research Bangalore IndiaDepartment of Cardiac Electrophysiology Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research Bangalore IndiaDepartment of Cardiac Electrophysiology Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research Bangalore IndiaDepartment of Cardiac Electrophysiology Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research Bangalore IndiaAbstract Background Fluoroscopic imaging involves exposure of the patients and the laboratory staff to ionizing radiation. One of the strategies that reduce such exposure in an electrophysiology laboratory is using a three‐dimensional electroanatomic mapping (3D EAM) system for performing these procedures. In this analysis, we have analyzed the effect of fluoroscopy frame rate on the radiation exposure and in‐hospital outcomes in ablation procedures performed under 3D EAM guidance. Methods We retrospectively analyzed all the ablation procedures performed under 3D EAM guidance at our institute from September 2015 to December 2018. The procedures were divided into two groups based on whether the procedures were performed before (pre) or after (post) January 26, 2018. After January 2018, fluoroscopy was used at a frame rate of 3.75 frames per second (fps). Radiation exposure indices and in‐hospital outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results Ablation procedures included in the analysis were ventricular arrhythmias (n = 192), atrial flutter (115), atrial tachycardia (AT) (43), and atrial fibrillation (AF) (30). Over the study period, there was a significant reduction in procedure time, fluoroscopy time, dose area product, and effective dose (ED) (P < .001). Except for AT and AF ablation procedures, there was a significant reduction in the radiation exposure indices when the “post” group was compared with the “pre” group (P ≤ .02). The decrease in the frame rate had no significant effect on in‐hospital outcomes. Conclusion The use of 3D EAM combined with decreasing the fluoroscopy frame rate significantly reduced the total radiation exposure without adversely affecting in‐hospital outcomes.https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12496atrial fluttereffective doseradiation exposurethree‐dimensional electroanatomic mappingventricular tachycardia |
spellingShingle | Muzaffar Ali Deepak Padmanabhan Khalil Kanjwal Milan Kumar Ghadei Anju Kottayan Bharatraj Banavalikar Jayaprakash Shenthar Effect of fluoroscopy frame rate on radiation exposure and in‐hospital outcomes in three‐dimensional electroanatomic mapping guided procedures Journal of Arrhythmia atrial flutter effective dose radiation exposure three‐dimensional electroanatomic mapping ventricular tachycardia |
title | Effect of fluoroscopy frame rate on radiation exposure and in‐hospital outcomes in three‐dimensional electroanatomic mapping guided procedures |
title_full | Effect of fluoroscopy frame rate on radiation exposure and in‐hospital outcomes in three‐dimensional electroanatomic mapping guided procedures |
title_fullStr | Effect of fluoroscopy frame rate on radiation exposure and in‐hospital outcomes in three‐dimensional electroanatomic mapping guided procedures |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of fluoroscopy frame rate on radiation exposure and in‐hospital outcomes in three‐dimensional electroanatomic mapping guided procedures |
title_short | Effect of fluoroscopy frame rate on radiation exposure and in‐hospital outcomes in three‐dimensional electroanatomic mapping guided procedures |
title_sort | effect of fluoroscopy frame rate on radiation exposure and in hospital outcomes in three dimensional electroanatomic mapping guided procedures |
topic | atrial flutter effective dose radiation exposure three‐dimensional electroanatomic mapping ventricular tachycardia |
url | https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12496 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muzaffarali effectoffluoroscopyframerateonradiationexposureandinhospitaloutcomesinthreedimensionalelectroanatomicmappingguidedprocedures AT deepakpadmanabhan effectoffluoroscopyframerateonradiationexposureandinhospitaloutcomesinthreedimensionalelectroanatomicmappingguidedprocedures AT khalilkanjwal effectoffluoroscopyframerateonradiationexposureandinhospitaloutcomesinthreedimensionalelectroanatomicmappingguidedprocedures AT milankumarghadei effectoffluoroscopyframerateonradiationexposureandinhospitaloutcomesinthreedimensionalelectroanatomicmappingguidedprocedures AT anjukottayan effectoffluoroscopyframerateonradiationexposureandinhospitaloutcomesinthreedimensionalelectroanatomicmappingguidedprocedures AT bharatrajbanavalikar effectoffluoroscopyframerateonradiationexposureandinhospitaloutcomesinthreedimensionalelectroanatomicmappingguidedprocedures AT jayaprakashshenthar effectoffluoroscopyframerateonradiationexposureandinhospitaloutcomesinthreedimensionalelectroanatomicmappingguidedprocedures |