Density-dependence and within-host competition in a semelparous parasite of leaf-cutting ants

<p>Abstract</p> <p/> <p>Background</p> <p>Parasite heterogeneity and within-host competition are thought to be important factors influencing the dynamics of host-parasite relationships. Yet, while there have been many theoretical investigations of how these factor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomsen Lene, Pedersen Dorthe, Ugelvig Line V, Petersen Klaus S, Hughes William OH, Poulsen Michael, Boomsma Jacobus J
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2004-11-01
Series:BMC Evolutionary Biology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/4/45
_version_ 1818890744708988928
author Thomsen Lene
Pedersen Dorthe
Ugelvig Line V
Petersen Klaus S
Hughes William OH
Poulsen Michael
Boomsma Jacobus J
author_facet Thomsen Lene
Pedersen Dorthe
Ugelvig Line V
Petersen Klaus S
Hughes William OH
Poulsen Michael
Boomsma Jacobus J
author_sort Thomsen Lene
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p/> <p>Background</p> <p>Parasite heterogeneity and within-host competition are thought to be important factors influencing the dynamics of host-parasite relationships. Yet, while there have been many theoretical investigations of how these factors may act, empirical data is more limited. We investigated the effects of parasite density and heterogeneity on parasite virulence and fitness using four strains of the entomopathogenic fungus, <it>Metarhizium anisopliae </it>var. <it>anisopliae</it>, and its leaf-cutting ant host <it>Acromyrmex echinatior </it>as the model system.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The relationship between parasite density and infection was sigmoidal, with there being an invasion threshold for an infection to occur (an Allee effect). Although spore production was positively density-dependent, parasite fitness decreased with increasing parasite density, indicating within-host scramble competition. The dynamics differed little between the four strains tested. In mixed infections of three strains the infection-growth dynamics were unaffected by parasite heterogeneity.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The strength of within-host competition makes dispersal the best strategy for the parasite. Parasite heterogeneity may not have effected virulence or the infection dynamics either because the most virulent strain outcompeted the others, or because the interaction involved scramble competition that was impervious to parasite heterogeneity. The dynamics observed may be common for virulent parasites, such as <it>Metarhizium</it>, that produce aggregated transmission stages. Such parasites make useful models for investigating infection dynamics and the impact of parasite competition.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-19T17:29:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0693c6264d1446a289effde7d3abb25c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2148
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T17:29:47Z
publishDate 2004-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Evolutionary Biology
spelling doaj.art-0693c6264d1446a289effde7d3abb25c2022-12-21T20:12:28ZengBMCBMC Evolutionary Biology1471-21482004-11-01414510.1186/1471-2148-4-45Density-dependence and within-host competition in a semelparous parasite of leaf-cutting antsThomsen LenePedersen DortheUgelvig Line VPetersen Klaus SHughes William OHPoulsen MichaelBoomsma Jacobus J<p>Abstract</p> <p/> <p>Background</p> <p>Parasite heterogeneity and within-host competition are thought to be important factors influencing the dynamics of host-parasite relationships. Yet, while there have been many theoretical investigations of how these factors may act, empirical data is more limited. We investigated the effects of parasite density and heterogeneity on parasite virulence and fitness using four strains of the entomopathogenic fungus, <it>Metarhizium anisopliae </it>var. <it>anisopliae</it>, and its leaf-cutting ant host <it>Acromyrmex echinatior </it>as the model system.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The relationship between parasite density and infection was sigmoidal, with there being an invasion threshold for an infection to occur (an Allee effect). Although spore production was positively density-dependent, parasite fitness decreased with increasing parasite density, indicating within-host scramble competition. The dynamics differed little between the four strains tested. In mixed infections of three strains the infection-growth dynamics were unaffected by parasite heterogeneity.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The strength of within-host competition makes dispersal the best strategy for the parasite. Parasite heterogeneity may not have effected virulence or the infection dynamics either because the most virulent strain outcompeted the others, or because the interaction involved scramble competition that was impervious to parasite heterogeneity. The dynamics observed may be common for virulent parasites, such as <it>Metarhizium</it>, that produce aggregated transmission stages. Such parasites make useful models for investigating infection dynamics and the impact of parasite competition.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/4/45
spellingShingle Thomsen Lene
Pedersen Dorthe
Ugelvig Line V
Petersen Klaus S
Hughes William OH
Poulsen Michael
Boomsma Jacobus J
Density-dependence and within-host competition in a semelparous parasite of leaf-cutting ants
BMC Evolutionary Biology
title Density-dependence and within-host competition in a semelparous parasite of leaf-cutting ants
title_full Density-dependence and within-host competition in a semelparous parasite of leaf-cutting ants
title_fullStr Density-dependence and within-host competition in a semelparous parasite of leaf-cutting ants
title_full_unstemmed Density-dependence and within-host competition in a semelparous parasite of leaf-cutting ants
title_short Density-dependence and within-host competition in a semelparous parasite of leaf-cutting ants
title_sort density dependence and within host competition in a semelparous parasite of leaf cutting ants
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/4/45
work_keys_str_mv AT thomsenlene densitydependenceandwithinhostcompetitioninasemelparousparasiteofleafcuttingants
AT pedersendorthe densitydependenceandwithinhostcompetitioninasemelparousparasiteofleafcuttingants
AT ugelviglinev densitydependenceandwithinhostcompetitioninasemelparousparasiteofleafcuttingants
AT petersenklauss densitydependenceandwithinhostcompetitioninasemelparousparasiteofleafcuttingants
AT hugheswilliamoh densitydependenceandwithinhostcompetitioninasemelparousparasiteofleafcuttingants
AT poulsenmichael densitydependenceandwithinhostcompetitioninasemelparousparasiteofleafcuttingants
AT boomsmajacobusj densitydependenceandwithinhostcompetitioninasemelparousparasiteofleafcuttingants