Approaches to the review of the Khotyn Uprising in 1919 in soviet and contemporary Ukrainian historiography

The Khotyn Uprising was an event that became one of the most striking pages in the history of the region in the XX century. Considerable attention was paid to the study of the history of this issue during the Soviet period, but interpretation of the rebellion has changed several times because of th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tetyana Dubitska
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University 2019-12-01
Series:Науковий вісник Чернівецького національного університету імені Юрія Федьковича. Історія
Online Access:https://hj.chnu.edu.ua/index.php/hj/article/view/108
_version_ 1811238611782205440
author Tetyana Dubitska
author_facet Tetyana Dubitska
author_sort Tetyana Dubitska
collection DOAJ
description The Khotyn Uprising was an event that became one of the most striking pages in the history of the region in the XX century. Considerable attention was paid to the study of the history of this issue during the Soviet period, but interpretation of the rebellion has changed several times because of the increasing influence of ideology on the research of Soviet scientists. With the proclamation of Ukraine's Independence, it became possible to objectively cover these events, which led to a process of rethinking the scientific works of Soviet researchers. The presence of different approaches in covering this issue necessitates a detailed analysis of the transformations that took place in the interpretation of the Khotyn uprising. The article explores the specific features of the main approaches to the coverage of the Khotyn uprising in Soviet and contemporary Ukrainian scientific historical literature. It is established that in the 20th – 40th of the XX century the Khotyn uprising was reported as a spontaneous peasant rebellion against the Romanian invaders. According to the Representatives of this approach, one of the main causes of the defeat of uprising was the absence of a Bolshevik insurgency organisation. It is revealed that 50th of the XX century became a transitional period between the previous interpretation of the Khotyn uprising and the new coverage of events, as scientists still emphasized that the uprising was peasantry, but began to provide a significance to revolutionary elements among them. Since the 60th of the XX century the situation is changed: ideology has become a decisive element in research of the uprising and, therefore, all events related to the uprising have been covered in according to the ideology. Thus, the Khotyn uprising is reported as prepared by the communist-led committee, had a well-planned commencement and aimed at restoring Soviet power in the Khotyn region. It is established that with the proclamation of Ukraine's Independence in the coverage of the uprising, there are dramatic changes related to the nature and purpose of the uprising, the political orientations of its leaders, etc. In contemporary Ukrainian science, for example, the Bolshevik character of the uprising and the struggle for power of the Soviets is refuted; instead, the emphasis was made on national liberation; it was confirmed the thesis about the orientation of some of the organizers of the uprising to the Ukrainian People's Republic in Kiev. The neutrality of the UPR’s Directory is explained because of the threat of war with Romania. Keywords: Khotyn uprising, Soviet historiography, contemporary Ukrainian historiography.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T12:45:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-06afd130e4dc4167be079829290f5378
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2414-9012
2616-8766
language deu
last_indexed 2024-04-12T12:45:41Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University
record_format Article
series Науковий вісник Чернівецького національного університету імені Юрія Федьковича. Історія
spelling doaj.art-06afd130e4dc4167be079829290f53782022-12-22T03:32:37ZdeuYuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National UniversityНауковий вісник Чернівецького національного університету імені Юрія Федьковича. Історія2414-90122616-87662019-12-015010.31861/hj2019.50.55-63Approaches to the review of the Khotyn Uprising in 1919 in soviet and contemporary Ukrainian historiographyTetyana Dubitska0Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University The Khotyn Uprising was an event that became one of the most striking pages in the history of the region in the XX century. Considerable attention was paid to the study of the history of this issue during the Soviet period, but interpretation of the rebellion has changed several times because of the increasing influence of ideology on the research of Soviet scientists. With the proclamation of Ukraine's Independence, it became possible to objectively cover these events, which led to a process of rethinking the scientific works of Soviet researchers. The presence of different approaches in covering this issue necessitates a detailed analysis of the transformations that took place in the interpretation of the Khotyn uprising. The article explores the specific features of the main approaches to the coverage of the Khotyn uprising in Soviet and contemporary Ukrainian scientific historical literature. It is established that in the 20th – 40th of the XX century the Khotyn uprising was reported as a spontaneous peasant rebellion against the Romanian invaders. According to the Representatives of this approach, one of the main causes of the defeat of uprising was the absence of a Bolshevik insurgency organisation. It is revealed that 50th of the XX century became a transitional period between the previous interpretation of the Khotyn uprising and the new coverage of events, as scientists still emphasized that the uprising was peasantry, but began to provide a significance to revolutionary elements among them. Since the 60th of the XX century the situation is changed: ideology has become a decisive element in research of the uprising and, therefore, all events related to the uprising have been covered in according to the ideology. Thus, the Khotyn uprising is reported as prepared by the communist-led committee, had a well-planned commencement and aimed at restoring Soviet power in the Khotyn region. It is established that with the proclamation of Ukraine's Independence in the coverage of the uprising, there are dramatic changes related to the nature and purpose of the uprising, the political orientations of its leaders, etc. In contemporary Ukrainian science, for example, the Bolshevik character of the uprising and the struggle for power of the Soviets is refuted; instead, the emphasis was made on national liberation; it was confirmed the thesis about the orientation of some of the organizers of the uprising to the Ukrainian People's Republic in Kiev. The neutrality of the UPR’s Directory is explained because of the threat of war with Romania. Keywords: Khotyn uprising, Soviet historiography, contemporary Ukrainian historiography. https://hj.chnu.edu.ua/index.php/hj/article/view/108
spellingShingle Tetyana Dubitska
Approaches to the review of the Khotyn Uprising in 1919 in soviet and contemporary Ukrainian historiography
Науковий вісник Чернівецького національного університету імені Юрія Федьковича. Історія
title Approaches to the review of the Khotyn Uprising in 1919 in soviet and contemporary Ukrainian historiography
title_full Approaches to the review of the Khotyn Uprising in 1919 in soviet and contemporary Ukrainian historiography
title_fullStr Approaches to the review of the Khotyn Uprising in 1919 in soviet and contemporary Ukrainian historiography
title_full_unstemmed Approaches to the review of the Khotyn Uprising in 1919 in soviet and contemporary Ukrainian historiography
title_short Approaches to the review of the Khotyn Uprising in 1919 in soviet and contemporary Ukrainian historiography
title_sort approaches to the review of the khotyn uprising in 1919 in soviet and contemporary ukrainian historiography
url https://hj.chnu.edu.ua/index.php/hj/article/view/108
work_keys_str_mv AT tetyanadubitska approachestothereviewofthekhotynuprisingin1919insovietandcontemporaryukrainianhistoriography