Estimating Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Direct Power Consumption of Linear Accelerator–Based External Beam Radiation Therapy

Purpose: Climate change is one of the direst health threats that humanity faces. We aim to estimate the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions associated with the energy usage from linear accelerator (LINAC)-based external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for the most common cancer diagnoses. Methods and Mater...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rachel F. Shenker, MD, Timothy L. Johnson, PhD, Marcio Ribeiro, MA, Anna Rodrigues, PhD, Junzo Chino, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-05-01
Series:Advances in Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109422002755
_version_ 1811173261868793856
author Rachel F. Shenker, MD
Timothy L. Johnson, PhD
Marcio Ribeiro, MA
Anna Rodrigues, PhD
Junzo Chino, MD
author_facet Rachel F. Shenker, MD
Timothy L. Johnson, PhD
Marcio Ribeiro, MA
Anna Rodrigues, PhD
Junzo Chino, MD
author_sort Rachel F. Shenker, MD
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: Climate change is one of the direst health threats that humanity faces. We aim to estimate the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions associated with the energy usage from linear accelerator (LINAC)-based external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for the most common cancer diagnoses. Methods and Materials: We identified patients with the 4 most common cancer types treated with curative-intent EBRT. Beam-on time for each fraction was extracted from the treatment planning system and averaged over each site and treatment modality. The power was multiplied by the beam-on time in hours to yield kilowatt hours (kWh). Using the US Environmental Protection Agency Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies calculator, we converted the kWh into estimates of CO2-equivalent emissions for the average US power grid. Idle time of the LINAC was estimated via Varian Medical Systems. Results: A total of 10 patients were included for each of the following modalities: conventionally fractionated for prostate cancer (28 fractions [fx]), prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) (5 fx), 15- and 5-fx regimens for early-stage breast cancer, 3- and 5-fx SBRT regimens for early-stage lung cancer, conventional EBRT (30 fx) for locally advanced lung cancer, and short- (5 fx) and long-course (25-28 fx) for rectal cancer. The modality with the lowest and highest carbon emissions per course, on average, was prostate SBRT (2.18 kg CO2; interquartile range, 1.92-2.30) and conventional treatment for prostate cancer (17.34 kg CO2; interquartile range, 10.26-23.79), respectively. This corresponds to CO2-equivalent emissions of driving an average of 5.4 miles and 41.2 miles in a standard vehicle, respectively. “Standby” mode for a LINAC TrueBeam and Clinac IX uses 112 kWh and 64.8 kWh per day, respectively. Conclusions: We have estimated CO2 emissions arising from direct energy usage of a LINAC for 4 common cancers treated with EBRT. “Standby” mode of a LINAC uses the most energy per day. Comprehensive studies are warranted to minimize the environmental effects of health and cancer care.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T17:44:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-06b40b5ce20f41a990654fb7d13ab94d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2452-1094
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T17:44:58Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Advances in Radiation Oncology
spelling doaj.art-06b40b5ce20f41a990654fb7d13ab94d2023-02-03T05:00:40ZengElsevierAdvances in Radiation Oncology2452-10942023-05-0183101170Estimating Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Direct Power Consumption of Linear Accelerator–Based External Beam Radiation TherapyRachel F. Shenker, MD0Timothy L. Johnson, PhD1Marcio Ribeiro, MA2Anna Rodrigues, PhD3Junzo Chino, MD4Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Corresponding author: Rachel F. Shenker, MDNicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North CarolinaInstitute of Energy and Environment, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North CarolinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North CarolinaPurpose: Climate change is one of the direst health threats that humanity faces. We aim to estimate the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions associated with the energy usage from linear accelerator (LINAC)-based external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for the most common cancer diagnoses. Methods and Materials: We identified patients with the 4 most common cancer types treated with curative-intent EBRT. Beam-on time for each fraction was extracted from the treatment planning system and averaged over each site and treatment modality. The power was multiplied by the beam-on time in hours to yield kilowatt hours (kWh). Using the US Environmental Protection Agency Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies calculator, we converted the kWh into estimates of CO2-equivalent emissions for the average US power grid. Idle time of the LINAC was estimated via Varian Medical Systems. Results: A total of 10 patients were included for each of the following modalities: conventionally fractionated for prostate cancer (28 fractions [fx]), prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) (5 fx), 15- and 5-fx regimens for early-stage breast cancer, 3- and 5-fx SBRT regimens for early-stage lung cancer, conventional EBRT (30 fx) for locally advanced lung cancer, and short- (5 fx) and long-course (25-28 fx) for rectal cancer. The modality with the lowest and highest carbon emissions per course, on average, was prostate SBRT (2.18 kg CO2; interquartile range, 1.92-2.30) and conventional treatment for prostate cancer (17.34 kg CO2; interquartile range, 10.26-23.79), respectively. This corresponds to CO2-equivalent emissions of driving an average of 5.4 miles and 41.2 miles in a standard vehicle, respectively. “Standby” mode for a LINAC TrueBeam and Clinac IX uses 112 kWh and 64.8 kWh per day, respectively. Conclusions: We have estimated CO2 emissions arising from direct energy usage of a LINAC for 4 common cancers treated with EBRT. “Standby” mode of a LINAC uses the most energy per day. Comprehensive studies are warranted to minimize the environmental effects of health and cancer care.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109422002755
spellingShingle Rachel F. Shenker, MD
Timothy L. Johnson, PhD
Marcio Ribeiro, MA
Anna Rodrigues, PhD
Junzo Chino, MD
Estimating Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Direct Power Consumption of Linear Accelerator–Based External Beam Radiation Therapy
Advances in Radiation Oncology
title Estimating Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Direct Power Consumption of Linear Accelerator–Based External Beam Radiation Therapy
title_full Estimating Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Direct Power Consumption of Linear Accelerator–Based External Beam Radiation Therapy
title_fullStr Estimating Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Direct Power Consumption of Linear Accelerator–Based External Beam Radiation Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Estimating Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Direct Power Consumption of Linear Accelerator–Based External Beam Radiation Therapy
title_short Estimating Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Direct Power Consumption of Linear Accelerator–Based External Beam Radiation Therapy
title_sort estimating carbon dioxide emissions and direct power consumption of linear accelerator based external beam radiation therapy
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109422002755
work_keys_str_mv AT rachelfshenkermd estimatingcarbondioxideemissionsanddirectpowerconsumptionoflinearacceleratorbasedexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT timothyljohnsonphd estimatingcarbondioxideemissionsanddirectpowerconsumptionoflinearacceleratorbasedexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT marcioribeiroma estimatingcarbondioxideemissionsanddirectpowerconsumptionoflinearacceleratorbasedexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT annarodriguesphd estimatingcarbondioxideemissionsanddirectpowerconsumptionoflinearacceleratorbasedexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT junzochinomd estimatingcarbondioxideemissionsanddirectpowerconsumptionoflinearacceleratorbasedexternalbeamradiationtherapy