True complete left bundle branch block reveals dyssynchrony evaluated by semiconductor single‐photon emission computed tomography

Abstract Background Conventional complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB) criteria sometimes result in a false‐positive diagnosis that does not represent dyssynchrony. Recently, true CLBBB criteria have been proposed to detect responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), although their co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Munehiro Iiya, Masato Shimizu, Hiroyuki Fujii, Makoto Suzuki, Mitsuhiro Nishizaki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-02-01
Series:Journal of Arrhythmia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12148
_version_ 1818163354055737344
author Munehiro Iiya
Masato Shimizu
Hiroyuki Fujii
Makoto Suzuki
Mitsuhiro Nishizaki
author_facet Munehiro Iiya
Masato Shimizu
Hiroyuki Fujii
Makoto Suzuki
Mitsuhiro Nishizaki
author_sort Munehiro Iiya
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Conventional complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB) criteria sometimes result in a false‐positive diagnosis that does not represent dyssynchrony. Recently, true CLBBB criteria have been proposed to detect responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), although their correlation with severity of dyssynchrony or natural prognosis is unclear. Methods Ninety‐four consecutive patients (74 ± 9 years, 63 men) with conventional CLBBB during sinus rhythm underwent semiconductor SPECT. They were divided into two groups: patients with true CLBBB and others. True CLBBB was characterized by the mid‐QRS notching/slurring and wide QRS duration (male, ≥140 milliseconds; female, ≥130 milliseconds). Multivariate analysis was performed to detect left ventricular dyssynchrony (LVD), defined as bandwidth ≥145° and/or phase standard deviation (SD) ≥43°. Primary endpoints (hospitalization for heart failure or cardiac death) were evaluated. Results True CLBBB had wider bandwidth (145 ± 83° vs 110 ± 64°, P = 0.024) and higher phase SD (48 ± 26° vs 35 ± 19°, P = 0.007). Ejection fraction (EF), end‐diastolic volume (EDV), summed rest score (SRS), and the presence of ischemic heart disease (IHD) showed no differences between groups (P = 0.401, 0.591, 0.165, and 0.212, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that true CLBBB, EF, and EDV were significant predictors of LVD (odds ratio, 12.6, 0.90, 1.03; P = 0.003, 0.002, 0.022, respectively). At 3‐year follow‐up (median 667 days), primary endpoints were comparable in both groups (log‐rank, P = 0.92). Conclusions Patients with true CLBBB had more severe dyssynchrony on single‐photon emission computed tomography than patients with nontrue CLBBB. On the other hand, the two groups showed no differences in EF, EDV, the presence of IHD, hospitalization for heart failure, and cardiac death.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T16:48:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-06b414ad3ad141ad97eed541e16e4dfd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1880-4276
1883-2148
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T16:48:13Z
publishDate 2019-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Arrhythmia
spelling doaj.art-06b414ad3ad141ad97eed541e16e4dfd2022-12-22T00:58:10ZengWileyJournal of Arrhythmia1880-42761883-21482019-02-01351707810.1002/joa3.12148True complete left bundle branch block reveals dyssynchrony evaluated by semiconductor single‐photon emission computed tomographyMunehiro Iiya0Masato Shimizu1Hiroyuki Fujii2Makoto Suzuki3Mitsuhiro Nishizaki4Department of Cardiology Yokohama Minami Kyosai Hospital Yokohama JapanDepartment of Cardiology Yokohama Minami Kyosai Hospital Yokohama JapanDepartment of Cardiology Yokohama Minami Kyosai Hospital Yokohama JapanDepartment of Cardiology Yokohama Minami Kyosai Hospital Yokohama JapanKanto Gakuin University Yokohama JapanAbstract Background Conventional complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB) criteria sometimes result in a false‐positive diagnosis that does not represent dyssynchrony. Recently, true CLBBB criteria have been proposed to detect responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), although their correlation with severity of dyssynchrony or natural prognosis is unclear. Methods Ninety‐four consecutive patients (74 ± 9 years, 63 men) with conventional CLBBB during sinus rhythm underwent semiconductor SPECT. They were divided into two groups: patients with true CLBBB and others. True CLBBB was characterized by the mid‐QRS notching/slurring and wide QRS duration (male, ≥140 milliseconds; female, ≥130 milliseconds). Multivariate analysis was performed to detect left ventricular dyssynchrony (LVD), defined as bandwidth ≥145° and/or phase standard deviation (SD) ≥43°. Primary endpoints (hospitalization for heart failure or cardiac death) were evaluated. Results True CLBBB had wider bandwidth (145 ± 83° vs 110 ± 64°, P = 0.024) and higher phase SD (48 ± 26° vs 35 ± 19°, P = 0.007). Ejection fraction (EF), end‐diastolic volume (EDV), summed rest score (SRS), and the presence of ischemic heart disease (IHD) showed no differences between groups (P = 0.401, 0.591, 0.165, and 0.212, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that true CLBBB, EF, and EDV were significant predictors of LVD (odds ratio, 12.6, 0.90, 1.03; P = 0.003, 0.002, 0.022, respectively). At 3‐year follow‐up (median 667 days), primary endpoints were comparable in both groups (log‐rank, P = 0.92). Conclusions Patients with true CLBBB had more severe dyssynchrony on single‐photon emission computed tomography than patients with nontrue CLBBB. On the other hand, the two groups showed no differences in EF, EDV, the presence of IHD, hospitalization for heart failure, and cardiac death.https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12148cardiac prognosiscardiac resynchronization therapycomplete left bundle branch blockdyssynchronysingle‐photon emission computed tomography
spellingShingle Munehiro Iiya
Masato Shimizu
Hiroyuki Fujii
Makoto Suzuki
Mitsuhiro Nishizaki
True complete left bundle branch block reveals dyssynchrony evaluated by semiconductor single‐photon emission computed tomography
Journal of Arrhythmia
cardiac prognosis
cardiac resynchronization therapy
complete left bundle branch block
dyssynchrony
single‐photon emission computed tomography
title True complete left bundle branch block reveals dyssynchrony evaluated by semiconductor single‐photon emission computed tomography
title_full True complete left bundle branch block reveals dyssynchrony evaluated by semiconductor single‐photon emission computed tomography
title_fullStr True complete left bundle branch block reveals dyssynchrony evaluated by semiconductor single‐photon emission computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed True complete left bundle branch block reveals dyssynchrony evaluated by semiconductor single‐photon emission computed tomography
title_short True complete left bundle branch block reveals dyssynchrony evaluated by semiconductor single‐photon emission computed tomography
title_sort true complete left bundle branch block reveals dyssynchrony evaluated by semiconductor single photon emission computed tomography
topic cardiac prognosis
cardiac resynchronization therapy
complete left bundle branch block
dyssynchrony
single‐photon emission computed tomography
url https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12148
work_keys_str_mv AT munehiroiiya truecompleteleftbundlebranchblockrevealsdyssynchronyevaluatedbysemiconductorsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomography
AT masatoshimizu truecompleteleftbundlebranchblockrevealsdyssynchronyevaluatedbysemiconductorsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomography
AT hiroyukifujii truecompleteleftbundlebranchblockrevealsdyssynchronyevaluatedbysemiconductorsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomography
AT makotosuzuki truecompleteleftbundlebranchblockrevealsdyssynchronyevaluatedbysemiconductorsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomography
AT mitsuhironishizaki truecompleteleftbundlebranchblockrevealsdyssynchronyevaluatedbysemiconductorsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomography