Bioindicators of severe ocean acidification are absent from the end-Permian mass extinction

Abstract The role of ocean acidification in the end-Permian mass extinction is highly controversial with conflicting hypotheses relating to its timing and extent. Observations and experiments on living molluscs demonstrate that those inhabiting acidic settings exhibit characteristic morphological de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: William J. Foster, J. A. Hirtz, C. Farrell, M. Reistroffer, R. J. Twitchett, R. C. Martindale
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2022-01-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-04991-9
_version_ 1818300278058778624
author William J. Foster
J. A. Hirtz
C. Farrell
M. Reistroffer
R. J. Twitchett
R. C. Martindale
author_facet William J. Foster
J. A. Hirtz
C. Farrell
M. Reistroffer
R. J. Twitchett
R. C. Martindale
author_sort William J. Foster
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The role of ocean acidification in the end-Permian mass extinction is highly controversial with conflicting hypotheses relating to its timing and extent. Observations and experiments on living molluscs demonstrate that those inhabiting acidic settings exhibit characteristic morphological deformities and disordered shell ultrastructures. These deformities should be recognisable in the fossil record, and provide a robust palaeo-proxy for severe ocean acidification. Here, we use fossils of originally aragonitic invertebrates to test whether ocean acidification occurred during the Permian–Triassic transition. Our results show that we can reject a hypothesised worldwide basal Triassic ocean acidification event owing to the absence of deformities and repair marks on bivalves and gastropods from the Triassic Hindeodus parvus Conodont Zone. We could not, however, utilise this proxy to test the role of a hypothesised acidification event just prior to and/or during the mass extinction event. If ocean acidification did develop during the mass extinction event, then it most likely only occurred in the latest Permian, and was not severe enough to impact calcification.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T05:04:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-06b615ec4f6144a7ab57a3d8be7d10c2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T05:04:34Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-06b615ec4f6144a7ab57a3d8be7d10c22022-12-21T23:58:42ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-01-011211910.1038/s41598-022-04991-9Bioindicators of severe ocean acidification are absent from the end-Permian mass extinctionWilliam J. Foster0J. A. Hirtz1C. Farrell2M. Reistroffer3R. J. Twitchett4R. C. Martindale5Institut für Geologie, Centrum für Erdsystemforschung und Nachhaltigkeit, Universität HamburgUniversity of Texas at Austin, Jackson School of GeosciencesSchool of Earth Sciences, University College DublinUniversity of Texas at Austin, Jackson School of GeosciencesDepartment of Earth Sciences, Natural History MuseumUniversity of Texas at Austin, Jackson School of GeosciencesAbstract The role of ocean acidification in the end-Permian mass extinction is highly controversial with conflicting hypotheses relating to its timing and extent. Observations and experiments on living molluscs demonstrate that those inhabiting acidic settings exhibit characteristic morphological deformities and disordered shell ultrastructures. These deformities should be recognisable in the fossil record, and provide a robust palaeo-proxy for severe ocean acidification. Here, we use fossils of originally aragonitic invertebrates to test whether ocean acidification occurred during the Permian–Triassic transition. Our results show that we can reject a hypothesised worldwide basal Triassic ocean acidification event owing to the absence of deformities and repair marks on bivalves and gastropods from the Triassic Hindeodus parvus Conodont Zone. We could not, however, utilise this proxy to test the role of a hypothesised acidification event just prior to and/or during the mass extinction event. If ocean acidification did develop during the mass extinction event, then it most likely only occurred in the latest Permian, and was not severe enough to impact calcification.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-04991-9
spellingShingle William J. Foster
J. A. Hirtz
C. Farrell
M. Reistroffer
R. J. Twitchett
R. C. Martindale
Bioindicators of severe ocean acidification are absent from the end-Permian mass extinction
Scientific Reports
title Bioindicators of severe ocean acidification are absent from the end-Permian mass extinction
title_full Bioindicators of severe ocean acidification are absent from the end-Permian mass extinction
title_fullStr Bioindicators of severe ocean acidification are absent from the end-Permian mass extinction
title_full_unstemmed Bioindicators of severe ocean acidification are absent from the end-Permian mass extinction
title_short Bioindicators of severe ocean acidification are absent from the end-Permian mass extinction
title_sort bioindicators of severe ocean acidification are absent from the end permian mass extinction
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-04991-9
work_keys_str_mv AT williamjfoster bioindicatorsofsevereoceanacidificationareabsentfromtheendpermianmassextinction
AT jahirtz bioindicatorsofsevereoceanacidificationareabsentfromtheendpermianmassextinction
AT cfarrell bioindicatorsofsevereoceanacidificationareabsentfromtheendpermianmassextinction
AT mreistroffer bioindicatorsofsevereoceanacidificationareabsentfromtheendpermianmassextinction
AT rjtwitchett bioindicatorsofsevereoceanacidificationareabsentfromtheendpermianmassextinction
AT rcmartindale bioindicatorsofsevereoceanacidificationareabsentfromtheendpermianmassextinction