Capital, credit and the business cycle in Marx

The purpose of this paper is to identify two inconsistencies that are found in the third chapter of Marx's Das Kapital, dedicated to the study of credit. In the first one Marx states that the distinction between commercial and bank credit is only nominal, but he resorts to it in order to provid...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jesús M. Zaratiegui, Mikel Manterola
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad Complutense de Madrid 2018-11-01
Series:Iberian Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/IJHE/article/view/62427
_version_ 1811207458156183552
author Jesús M. Zaratiegui
Mikel Manterola
author_facet Jesús M. Zaratiegui
Mikel Manterola
author_sort Jesús M. Zaratiegui
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of this paper is to identify two inconsistencies that are found in the third chapter of Marx's Das Kapital, dedicated to the study of credit. In the first one Marx states that the distinction between commercial and bank credit is only nominal, but he resorts to it in order to provide an explanation for the nineteenth century crisis in England, thus implying that the distinction was not only nominal, but real. The second inconsistency is noticed between Marx’s statement that real and money capital move in opposite directions during the trade cycle (with-out an explanation of how it is possible), and the second book of The Capital where Marx states that capital in the form of money and real capital must move in the same directions during the business cycle
first_indexed 2024-04-12T04:03:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-06b8951537e949bf9745e4906654ef30
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2386-5768
language Spanish
last_indexed 2024-04-12T04:03:34Z
publishDate 2018-11-01
publisher Universidad Complutense de Madrid
record_format Article
series Iberian Journal of the History of Economic Thought
spelling doaj.art-06b8951537e949bf9745e4906654ef302022-12-22T03:48:39ZspaUniversidad Complutense de MadridIberian Journal of the History of Economic Thought2386-57682018-11-015210.5209/IJHE.6242756397Capital, credit and the business cycle in MarxJesús M. Zaratiegui0Mikel Manterola1School of Economics and Business Administration, Department of Economics, University of NavarraDoctor in Economics, University of NavarraThe purpose of this paper is to identify two inconsistencies that are found in the third chapter of Marx's Das Kapital, dedicated to the study of credit. In the first one Marx states that the distinction between commercial and bank credit is only nominal, but he resorts to it in order to provide an explanation for the nineteenth century crisis in England, thus implying that the distinction was not only nominal, but real. The second inconsistency is noticed between Marx’s statement that real and money capital move in opposite directions during the trade cycle (with-out an explanation of how it is possible), and the second book of The Capital where Marx states that capital in the form of money and real capital must move in the same directions during the business cyclehttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/IJHE/article/view/62427Marxinconsistencybank creditmoney capital
spellingShingle Jesús M. Zaratiegui
Mikel Manterola
Capital, credit and the business cycle in Marx
Iberian Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Marx
inconsistency
bank credit
money capital
title Capital, credit and the business cycle in Marx
title_full Capital, credit and the business cycle in Marx
title_fullStr Capital, credit and the business cycle in Marx
title_full_unstemmed Capital, credit and the business cycle in Marx
title_short Capital, credit and the business cycle in Marx
title_sort capital credit and the business cycle in marx
topic Marx
inconsistency
bank credit
money capital
url https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/IJHE/article/view/62427
work_keys_str_mv AT jesusmzaratiegui capitalcreditandthebusinesscycleinmarx
AT mikelmanterola capitalcreditandthebusinesscycleinmarx