Relay Architectures for 3GPP LTE-Advanced

<p/> <p>The Third Generation Partnership Project's Long Term Evolution-Advanced is considering relaying for cost-effective throughput enhancement and coverage extension. While analog repeaters have been used to enhance coverage in commercial cellular networks, the use of more sophis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peters StevenW, Panah AliY, Truong KienT, Heath RobertW
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2009-01-01
Series:EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
Online Access:http://jwcn.eurasipjournals.com/content/2009/618787
_version_ 1818901219522904064
author Peters StevenW
Panah AliY
Truong KienT
Heath RobertW
author_facet Peters StevenW
Panah AliY
Truong KienT
Heath RobertW
author_sort Peters StevenW
collection DOAJ
description <p/> <p>The Third Generation Partnership Project's Long Term Evolution-Advanced is considering relaying for cost-effective throughput enhancement and coverage extension. While analog repeaters have been used to enhance coverage in commercial cellular networks, the use of more sophisticated fixed relays is relatively new. The main challenge faced by relay deployments in cellular systems is overcoming the extra interference added by the presence of relays. Most prior work on relaying does not consider interference, however. This paper analyzes the performance of several emerging half-duplex relay strategies in interference-limited cellular systems: one-way, two-way, and shared relays. The performance of each strategy as a function of location, sectoring, and frequency reuse are compared with localized base station coordination. One-way relaying is shown to provide modest gains over single-hop cellular networks in some regimes. Shared relaying is shown to approach the gains of local base station coordination at reduced complexity, while two-way relaying further reduces complexity but only works well when the relay is close to the handset. Frequency reuse of one, where each sector uses the same spectrum, is shown to have the highest network throughput. Simulations with realistic channel models provide performance comparisons that reveal the importance of interference mitigation in multihop cellular networks.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-19T20:16:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-06be94e22ae643af932b5a235e95df00
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1687-1472
1687-1499
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T20:16:17Z
publishDate 2009-01-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
spelling doaj.art-06be94e22ae643af932b5a235e95df002022-12-21T20:07:10ZengSpringerOpenEURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking1687-14721687-14992009-01-0120091618787Relay Architectures for 3GPP LTE-AdvancedPeters StevenWPanah AliYTruong KienTHeath RobertW<p/> <p>The Third Generation Partnership Project's Long Term Evolution-Advanced is considering relaying for cost-effective throughput enhancement and coverage extension. While analog repeaters have been used to enhance coverage in commercial cellular networks, the use of more sophisticated fixed relays is relatively new. The main challenge faced by relay deployments in cellular systems is overcoming the extra interference added by the presence of relays. Most prior work on relaying does not consider interference, however. This paper analyzes the performance of several emerging half-duplex relay strategies in interference-limited cellular systems: one-way, two-way, and shared relays. The performance of each strategy as a function of location, sectoring, and frequency reuse are compared with localized base station coordination. One-way relaying is shown to provide modest gains over single-hop cellular networks in some regimes. Shared relaying is shown to approach the gains of local base station coordination at reduced complexity, while two-way relaying further reduces complexity but only works well when the relay is close to the handset. Frequency reuse of one, where each sector uses the same spectrum, is shown to have the highest network throughput. Simulations with realistic channel models provide performance comparisons that reveal the importance of interference mitigation in multihop cellular networks.</p>http://jwcn.eurasipjournals.com/content/2009/618787
spellingShingle Peters StevenW
Panah AliY
Truong KienT
Heath RobertW
Relay Architectures for 3GPP LTE-Advanced
EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
title Relay Architectures for 3GPP LTE-Advanced
title_full Relay Architectures for 3GPP LTE-Advanced
title_fullStr Relay Architectures for 3GPP LTE-Advanced
title_full_unstemmed Relay Architectures for 3GPP LTE-Advanced
title_short Relay Architectures for 3GPP LTE-Advanced
title_sort relay architectures for 3gpp lte advanced
url http://jwcn.eurasipjournals.com/content/2009/618787
work_keys_str_mv AT petersstevenw relayarchitecturesfor3gpplteadvanced
AT panahaliy relayarchitecturesfor3gpplteadvanced
AT truongkient relayarchitecturesfor3gpplteadvanced
AT heathrobertw relayarchitecturesfor3gpplteadvanced