Deconstructing the Leviathan: Derrida’s The Beast and the Sovereign
Derrida’s The Beast & the Sovereign, volume I, explores the contradictory appearance of animals in political discourse. Sometimes, as he points out, political man and the sovereign state appear in the form of an animal and, at other times, as superior to animals of which he...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2012-12-01
|
| Series: | Societies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/2/4/357 |
| _version_ | 1818318326532669440 |
|---|---|
| author | Jacques de Ville |
| author_facet | Jacques de Ville |
| author_sort | Jacques de Ville |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Derrida’s The Beast & the Sovereign, volume I, explores the contradictory appearance of animals in political discourse. Sometimes, as he points out, political man and the sovereign state appear in the form of an animal and, at other times, as superior to animals of which he is the master. In session two of the Seminar, the main focus of this essay, Derrida explores the ‘origin’ of this contradictory logic inter alia with reference to animal fables which he contends draw on unconscious forces in their invocation of images. They pretend to make known something that cannot be the object of knowledge. In the same vein, Derrida shows how Hobbes’s Leviathan and sovereignty itself are constructed and maintained through an uncanny fear, a fear not in the first place of one’s fellow man, but of the wolf within the self, i.e., the drive to self-destruction. It is the repression of this wolf, Derrida suggests, which leads to the further contradictory logic (in Hobbes) of excluding both beast and God from the covenant whilst maintaining God as the model of sovereignty. God, in other words, ‘is’ the beast repressed and can therefore hardly serve as the foundation of sovereignty. The self, and ultimately sovereignty, it can be said in view of Derrida’s analysis, is never purely present to itself but instead arrives at itself by way of the ‘binding’ of unconscious forces. Sovereignty in this way ultimately shows itself to be divisible. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-13T09:51:27Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-06c6ba60aa0d46d19cb5aa3e23c5c652 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2075-4698 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-13T09:51:27Z |
| publishDate | 2012-12-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Societies |
| spelling | doaj.art-06c6ba60aa0d46d19cb5aa3e23c5c6522022-12-21T23:51:55ZengMDPI AGSocieties2075-46982012-12-012435737110.3390/soc2040357Deconstructing the Leviathan: Derrida’s The Beast and the SovereignJacques de VilleDerrida’s The Beast & the Sovereign, volume I, explores the contradictory appearance of animals in political discourse. Sometimes, as he points out, political man and the sovereign state appear in the form of an animal and, at other times, as superior to animals of which he is the master. In session two of the Seminar, the main focus of this essay, Derrida explores the ‘origin’ of this contradictory logic inter alia with reference to animal fables which he contends draw on unconscious forces in their invocation of images. They pretend to make known something that cannot be the object of knowledge. In the same vein, Derrida shows how Hobbes’s Leviathan and sovereignty itself are constructed and maintained through an uncanny fear, a fear not in the first place of one’s fellow man, but of the wolf within the self, i.e., the drive to self-destruction. It is the repression of this wolf, Derrida suggests, which leads to the further contradictory logic (in Hobbes) of excluding both beast and God from the covenant whilst maintaining God as the model of sovereignty. God, in other words, ‘is’ the beast repressed and can therefore hardly serve as the foundation of sovereignty. The self, and ultimately sovereignty, it can be said in view of Derrida’s analysis, is never purely present to itself but instead arrives at itself by way of the ‘binding’ of unconscious forces. Sovereignty in this way ultimately shows itself to be divisible.http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/2/4/357DerridaFreudHobbesfablefearGodbeastsovereignty |
| spellingShingle | Jacques de Ville Deconstructing the Leviathan: Derrida’s The Beast and the Sovereign Societies Derrida Freud Hobbes fable fear God beast sovereignty |
| title | Deconstructing the Leviathan: Derrida’s The Beast and the Sovereign |
| title_full | Deconstructing the Leviathan: Derrida’s The Beast and the Sovereign |
| title_fullStr | Deconstructing the Leviathan: Derrida’s The Beast and the Sovereign |
| title_full_unstemmed | Deconstructing the Leviathan: Derrida’s The Beast and the Sovereign |
| title_short | Deconstructing the Leviathan: Derrida’s The Beast and the Sovereign |
| title_sort | deconstructing the leviathan derrida amp 8217 s the beast and the sovereign |
| topic | Derrida Freud Hobbes fable fear God beast sovereignty |
| url | http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/2/4/357 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jacquesdeville deconstructingtheleviathanderridaamp8217sthebeastandthesovereign |