DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF MRI IN SONOGRAPHICALLY INDETERMINATE ADNEXAL MASSES

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy of MRI in characterization of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses while histopathology is taken as gold standard. Study design: Cross sectional (validation) study Duration of study: from July 2013 to December 2013 Setting: Radiology Department...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shama Aslam, Anjum Mehdi, Murtaza Ali et al.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Faisalabad 2017-06-01
Series:Journal of University Medical & Dental College
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jumdc.com/index.php/jumdc/article/view/126
_version_ 1818272162347220992
author Shama Aslam
Anjum Mehdi
Murtaza Ali et al.
author_facet Shama Aslam
Anjum Mehdi
Murtaza Ali et al.
author_sort Shama Aslam
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy of MRI in characterization of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses while histopathology is taken as gold standard. Study design: Cross sectional (validation) study Duration of study: from July 2013 to December 2013 Setting: Radiology Department of Allied Hospital Faisalabad. Patient & methods: After obtaining approval from institutional ethical committee, a total of 61 patients were enrolled in this study. All the patients are examined with MR imaging performed on a 1.5-T Philips MR imaging unit in the radiology department Allied Hospital Faisalabad. The mean interval between sonography and MRI was 7 days. The final diagnosis for each of the 61 masses was established by histopathology. RESULTS: All women having a mean age of 45 years (range, 16–86 years) who were having sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses were included in the study. The mean interval between sonography and MRI was 7 days. There were 72.1% benign and 27.9% malignant cases on MRI while on histopathology 77% masses were benign and 23% malignant. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI in determining adnexal masses in our study is 100% & 93.6% Conclusion: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has high contrast resolution, it provides good tissue characterization, and also capable of multiplanar imaging capabilities; it is a useful tool for diagnosis of female pelvic pathology. Magnetic resonance imaging is helpful in characterization of adnexal masses were ultrasound cannot evaluate it properly.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T21:37:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-06d27b5cd04e403db157fd9ce8dbd821
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2221-7827
2310-5542
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T21:37:41Z
publishDate 2017-06-01
publisher University of Faisalabad
record_format Article
series Journal of University Medical & Dental College
spelling doaj.art-06d27b5cd04e403db157fd9ce8dbd8212022-12-22T00:11:09ZengUniversity of FaisalabadJournal of University Medical & Dental College2221-78272310-55422017-06-0182DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF MRI IN SONOGRAPHICALLY INDETERMINATE ADNEXAL MASSESShama Aslam0 Anjum Mehdi1Murtaza Ali et al.2Assistant Professor Radiology, Madina Teaching HospitalAssociate Professor Radiology, Allied Hospital Faisalabad Senior Registrar Orthopaedics, Allied Hospital FaisalabadABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy of MRI in characterization of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses while histopathology is taken as gold standard. Study design: Cross sectional (validation) study Duration of study: from July 2013 to December 2013 Setting: Radiology Department of Allied Hospital Faisalabad. Patient & methods: After obtaining approval from institutional ethical committee, a total of 61 patients were enrolled in this study. All the patients are examined with MR imaging performed on a 1.5-T Philips MR imaging unit in the radiology department Allied Hospital Faisalabad. The mean interval between sonography and MRI was 7 days. The final diagnosis for each of the 61 masses was established by histopathology. RESULTS: All women having a mean age of 45 years (range, 16–86 years) who were having sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses were included in the study. The mean interval between sonography and MRI was 7 days. There were 72.1% benign and 27.9% malignant cases on MRI while on histopathology 77% masses were benign and 23% malignant. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI in determining adnexal masses in our study is 100% & 93.6% Conclusion: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has high contrast resolution, it provides good tissue characterization, and also capable of multiplanar imaging capabilities; it is a useful tool for diagnosis of female pelvic pathology. Magnetic resonance imaging is helpful in characterization of adnexal masses were ultrasound cannot evaluate it properly.http://jumdc.com/index.php/jumdc/article/view/126adnexal massesMagnetic resonance imagingultrasonography
spellingShingle Shama Aslam
Anjum Mehdi
Murtaza Ali et al.
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF MRI IN SONOGRAPHICALLY INDETERMINATE ADNEXAL MASSES
Journal of University Medical & Dental College
adnexal masses
Magnetic resonance imaging
ultrasonography
title DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF MRI IN SONOGRAPHICALLY INDETERMINATE ADNEXAL MASSES
title_full DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF MRI IN SONOGRAPHICALLY INDETERMINATE ADNEXAL MASSES
title_fullStr DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF MRI IN SONOGRAPHICALLY INDETERMINATE ADNEXAL MASSES
title_full_unstemmed DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF MRI IN SONOGRAPHICALLY INDETERMINATE ADNEXAL MASSES
title_short DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF MRI IN SONOGRAPHICALLY INDETERMINATE ADNEXAL MASSES
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of mri in sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses
topic adnexal masses
Magnetic resonance imaging
ultrasonography
url http://jumdc.com/index.php/jumdc/article/view/126
work_keys_str_mv AT shamaaslam diagnosticaccuracyofmriinsonographicallyindeterminateadnexalmasses
AT anjummehdi diagnosticaccuracyofmriinsonographicallyindeterminateadnexalmasses
AT murtazaalietal diagnosticaccuracyofmriinsonographicallyindeterminateadnexalmasses