Laboratory contamination in airway microbiome studies

Abstract Background The low bacterial load in samples acquired from the lungs, have made studies on the airway microbiome vulnerable to contamination from bacterial DNA introduced during sampling and laboratory processing. We have examined the impact of laboratory contamination on samples collected...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christine Drengenes, Harald G. Wiker, Tharmini Kalananthan, Eli Nordeide, Tomas M. L. Eagan, Rune Nielsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-08-01
Series:BMC Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12866-019-1560-1
_version_ 1819205653658337280
author Christine Drengenes
Harald G. Wiker
Tharmini Kalananthan
Eli Nordeide
Tomas M. L. Eagan
Rune Nielsen
author_facet Christine Drengenes
Harald G. Wiker
Tharmini Kalananthan
Eli Nordeide
Tomas M. L. Eagan
Rune Nielsen
author_sort Christine Drengenes
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The low bacterial load in samples acquired from the lungs, have made studies on the airway microbiome vulnerable to contamination from bacterial DNA introduced during sampling and laboratory processing. We have examined the impact of laboratory contamination on samples collected from the lower airways by protected (through a sterile catheter) bronchoscopy and explored various in silico approaches to dealing with the contamination post-sequencing. Our analyses included quantitative PCR and targeted amplicon sequencing of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. Results The mean bacterial load varied by sample type for the 23 study subjects (oral wash>1st fraction of protected bronchoalveolar lavage>protected specimen brush>2nd fraction of protected bronchoalveolar lavage; p < 0.001). By comparison to a dilution series of know bacterial composition and load, an estimated 10–50% of the bacterial community profiles for lower airway samples could be traced back to contaminating bacterial DNA introduced from the laboratory. We determined the main source of laboratory contaminants to be the DNA extraction kit (FastDNA Spin Kit). The removal of contaminants identified using tools within the Decontam R package appeared to provide a balance between keeping and removing taxa found in both negative controls and study samples. Conclusions The influence of laboratory contamination will vary across airway microbiome studies. By reporting estimates of contaminant levels and taking use of contaminant identification tools (e.g. the Decontam R package) based on statistical models that limit the subjectivity of the researcher, the accuracy of inter-study comparisons can be improved.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T04:55:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-06db223ee85240f6b13a537aed9b4dd1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2180
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T04:55:08Z
publishDate 2019-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Microbiology
spelling doaj.art-06db223ee85240f6b13a537aed9b4dd12022-12-21T17:59:21ZengBMCBMC Microbiology1471-21802019-08-0119111310.1186/s12866-019-1560-1Laboratory contamination in airway microbiome studiesChristine Drengenes0Harald G. Wiker1Tharmini Kalananthan2Eli Nordeide3Tomas M. L. Eagan4Rune Nielsen5Department of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University HospitalDepartment of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of BergenDepartment of Microbiology, Haukeland University HospitalDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University HospitalDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University HospitalDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University HospitalAbstract Background The low bacterial load in samples acquired from the lungs, have made studies on the airway microbiome vulnerable to contamination from bacterial DNA introduced during sampling and laboratory processing. We have examined the impact of laboratory contamination on samples collected from the lower airways by protected (through a sterile catheter) bronchoscopy and explored various in silico approaches to dealing with the contamination post-sequencing. Our analyses included quantitative PCR and targeted amplicon sequencing of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. Results The mean bacterial load varied by sample type for the 23 study subjects (oral wash>1st fraction of protected bronchoalveolar lavage>protected specimen brush>2nd fraction of protected bronchoalveolar lavage; p < 0.001). By comparison to a dilution series of know bacterial composition and load, an estimated 10–50% of the bacterial community profiles for lower airway samples could be traced back to contaminating bacterial DNA introduced from the laboratory. We determined the main source of laboratory contaminants to be the DNA extraction kit (FastDNA Spin Kit). The removal of contaminants identified using tools within the Decontam R package appeared to provide a balance between keeping and removing taxa found in both negative controls and study samples. Conclusions The influence of laboratory contamination will vary across airway microbiome studies. By reporting estimates of contaminant levels and taking use of contaminant identification tools (e.g. the Decontam R package) based on statistical models that limit the subjectivity of the researcher, the accuracy of inter-study comparisons can be improved.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12866-019-1560-1MicrobiomeContaminationLow biomassRespiratory16S rRNA gene
spellingShingle Christine Drengenes
Harald G. Wiker
Tharmini Kalananthan
Eli Nordeide
Tomas M. L. Eagan
Rune Nielsen
Laboratory contamination in airway microbiome studies
BMC Microbiology
Microbiome
Contamination
Low biomass
Respiratory
16S rRNA gene
title Laboratory contamination in airway microbiome studies
title_full Laboratory contamination in airway microbiome studies
title_fullStr Laboratory contamination in airway microbiome studies
title_full_unstemmed Laboratory contamination in airway microbiome studies
title_short Laboratory contamination in airway microbiome studies
title_sort laboratory contamination in airway microbiome studies
topic Microbiome
Contamination
Low biomass
Respiratory
16S rRNA gene
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12866-019-1560-1
work_keys_str_mv AT christinedrengenes laboratorycontaminationinairwaymicrobiomestudies
AT haraldgwiker laboratorycontaminationinairwaymicrobiomestudies
AT tharminikalananthan laboratorycontaminationinairwaymicrobiomestudies
AT elinordeide laboratorycontaminationinairwaymicrobiomestudies
AT tomasmleagan laboratorycontaminationinairwaymicrobiomestudies
AT runenielsen laboratorycontaminationinairwaymicrobiomestudies