Immune control of HIV-1 infection after therapy interruption: immediate versus deferred antiretroviral therapy

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The optimal stage for initiating antiretroviral therapies in HIV-1 bearing patients is still a matter of debate.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We present computer simulations of HIV-1 infection aimed at identifying th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bernaschi Massimo, Carello Rossella, Paci Paola, D'Offizi Gianpiero, Castiglione Filippo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-10-01
Series:BMC Infectious Diseases
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/9/172
_version_ 1818145583318171648
author Bernaschi Massimo
Carello Rossella
Paci Paola
D'Offizi Gianpiero
Castiglione Filippo
author_facet Bernaschi Massimo
Carello Rossella
Paci Paola
D'Offizi Gianpiero
Castiglione Filippo
author_sort Bernaschi Massimo
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The optimal stage for initiating antiretroviral therapies in HIV-1 bearing patients is still a matter of debate.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We present computer simulations of HIV-1 infection aimed at identifying the <it>pro et contra </it>of <it>immediate </it>as compared to <it>deferred </it>Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Our simulations highlight that a prompt specific CD8<sup>+ </sup>cytotoxic T lymphocytes response is detected when therapy is delayed. Compared to very early initiation of HAART, in deferred treated patients CD8<sup>+ </sup>T cells manage to mediate the decline of viremia in a shorter time and, at interruption of therapy, the virus experiences a stronger immune pressure. We also observe, however, that the immunological effects of the therapy fade with time in both therapeutic regimens. Thus, within one year from discontinuation, viral burden recovers to the value at which it would level off in the absence of therapy.</p> <p>In summary, simulations show that immediate therapy does not prolong the disease-free period and does not confer a survival benefit when compared to treatment started during the chronic infection phase.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our conclusion is that, since there is no therapy to date that guarantees life-long protection, deferral of therapy should be preferred in order to minimize the risk of adverse effects, the occurrence of drug resistances and the costs of treatment.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-11T12:05:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-06ebd8c678a244709580bd5bdfed44c7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2334
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T12:05:46Z
publishDate 2009-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Infectious Diseases
spelling doaj.art-06ebd8c678a244709580bd5bdfed44c72022-12-22T01:07:56ZengBMCBMC Infectious Diseases1471-23342009-10-019117210.1186/1471-2334-9-172Immune control of HIV-1 infection after therapy interruption: immediate versus deferred antiretroviral therapyBernaschi MassimoCarello RossellaPaci PaolaD'Offizi GianpieroCastiglione Filippo<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The optimal stage for initiating antiretroviral therapies in HIV-1 bearing patients is still a matter of debate.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We present computer simulations of HIV-1 infection aimed at identifying the <it>pro et contra </it>of <it>immediate </it>as compared to <it>deferred </it>Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Our simulations highlight that a prompt specific CD8<sup>+ </sup>cytotoxic T lymphocytes response is detected when therapy is delayed. Compared to very early initiation of HAART, in deferred treated patients CD8<sup>+ </sup>T cells manage to mediate the decline of viremia in a shorter time and, at interruption of therapy, the virus experiences a stronger immune pressure. We also observe, however, that the immunological effects of the therapy fade with time in both therapeutic regimens. Thus, within one year from discontinuation, viral burden recovers to the value at which it would level off in the absence of therapy.</p> <p>In summary, simulations show that immediate therapy does not prolong the disease-free period and does not confer a survival benefit when compared to treatment started during the chronic infection phase.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our conclusion is that, since there is no therapy to date that guarantees life-long protection, deferral of therapy should be preferred in order to minimize the risk of adverse effects, the occurrence of drug resistances and the costs of treatment.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/9/172
spellingShingle Bernaschi Massimo
Carello Rossella
Paci Paola
D'Offizi Gianpiero
Castiglione Filippo
Immune control of HIV-1 infection after therapy interruption: immediate versus deferred antiretroviral therapy
BMC Infectious Diseases
title Immune control of HIV-1 infection after therapy interruption: immediate versus deferred antiretroviral therapy
title_full Immune control of HIV-1 infection after therapy interruption: immediate versus deferred antiretroviral therapy
title_fullStr Immune control of HIV-1 infection after therapy interruption: immediate versus deferred antiretroviral therapy
title_full_unstemmed Immune control of HIV-1 infection after therapy interruption: immediate versus deferred antiretroviral therapy
title_short Immune control of HIV-1 infection after therapy interruption: immediate versus deferred antiretroviral therapy
title_sort immune control of hiv 1 infection after therapy interruption immediate versus deferred antiretroviral therapy
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/9/172
work_keys_str_mv AT bernaschimassimo immunecontrolofhiv1infectionaftertherapyinterruptionimmediateversusdeferredantiretroviraltherapy
AT carellorossella immunecontrolofhiv1infectionaftertherapyinterruptionimmediateversusdeferredantiretroviraltherapy
AT pacipaola immunecontrolofhiv1infectionaftertherapyinterruptionimmediateversusdeferredantiretroviraltherapy
AT doffizigianpiero immunecontrolofhiv1infectionaftertherapyinterruptionimmediateversusdeferredantiretroviraltherapy
AT castiglionefilippo immunecontrolofhiv1infectionaftertherapyinterruptionimmediateversusdeferredantiretroviraltherapy