Mapping variability of soybean leaf potassium concentrations to develop a sampling protocol

Abstract The spatial variability of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] leaf‐K (potassium) concentrations must be considered when collecting samples to monitor crop K status. Five commercial soybean fields were sampled at a 0.4‐ha grid resolution at two reproductive growth stages to quantify the trifol...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carrie C. Ortel, Trenton L. Roberts, Kyle A. Hoegenauer, Aurelie M. Poncet, Nathan A. Slaton, W. Jeremy Ross
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-12-01
Series:Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20439
_version_ 1797389589342584832
author Carrie C. Ortel
Trenton L. Roberts
Kyle A. Hoegenauer
Aurelie M. Poncet
Nathan A. Slaton
W. Jeremy Ross
author_facet Carrie C. Ortel
Trenton L. Roberts
Kyle A. Hoegenauer
Aurelie M. Poncet
Nathan A. Slaton
W. Jeremy Ross
author_sort Carrie C. Ortel
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The spatial variability of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] leaf‐K (potassium) concentrations must be considered when collecting samples to monitor crop K status. Five commercial soybean fields were sampled at a 0.4‐ha grid resolution at two reproductive growth stages to quantify the trifoliolate tissue‐K concentration. The objectives of this study were to identify the potential field variability of soybean leaf‐K concentrations in typical Mid‐south US soybean production fields, evaluate interpolation methods, and develop a sampling protocol for in‐season soybean tissue monitoring. No consistent spatial dependencies were found in the leaf‐K concentrations across the fields and sample times, indicating that a soybean tissue‐K grid sampling protocol cannot be generalized to a specific area size. Inverse distance weighted (IDW) and rasterization interpolation methods were considered to predict leaf‐K concentrations between the sampled grid points at grid resolutions ranging from 0.4 to 4 ha. The IDW method consistently predicted leaf‐K concentrations between the known values with less error than rasterization. Rather than grid sampling, composite leaf samples should be collected based on management zones to provide a simplified sampling protocol. Within each management zone, a composite sample must consist of uppermost fully expanded trifoliolate leaves collected from at least 18 locations to ensure that the sample measures within the 95% confidence interval of the area average leaf‐K concentration. The developed sampling protocol coupled with the dynamic critical tissue‐K concentration curve will provide producers with the ability to effectively monitor soybean for potential hidden hunger and verify K deficiency symptoms in season.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T22:58:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-06fb5696e75747268c8b2a9749ac9cfa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2639-6696
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T22:58:07Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
spelling doaj.art-06fb5696e75747268c8b2a9749ac9cfa2023-12-16T02:28:30ZengWileyAgrosystems, Geosciences & Environment2639-66962023-12-0164n/an/a10.1002/agg2.20439Mapping variability of soybean leaf potassium concentrations to develop a sampling protocolCarrie C. Ortel0Trenton L. Roberts1Kyle A. Hoegenauer2Aurelie M. Poncet3Nathan A. Slaton4W. Jeremy Ross5Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences Department University of Arkansas Fayetteville Arkansas USACrop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences Department University of Arkansas Fayetteville Arkansas USACrop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences Department University of Arkansas Fayetteville Arkansas USACrop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences Department University of Arkansas Fayetteville Arkansas USACrop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences Department University of Arkansas Fayetteville Arkansas USACooperative Extension Service University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture Little Rock Arkansas USAAbstract The spatial variability of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] leaf‐K (potassium) concentrations must be considered when collecting samples to monitor crop K status. Five commercial soybean fields were sampled at a 0.4‐ha grid resolution at two reproductive growth stages to quantify the trifoliolate tissue‐K concentration. The objectives of this study were to identify the potential field variability of soybean leaf‐K concentrations in typical Mid‐south US soybean production fields, evaluate interpolation methods, and develop a sampling protocol for in‐season soybean tissue monitoring. No consistent spatial dependencies were found in the leaf‐K concentrations across the fields and sample times, indicating that a soybean tissue‐K grid sampling protocol cannot be generalized to a specific area size. Inverse distance weighted (IDW) and rasterization interpolation methods were considered to predict leaf‐K concentrations between the sampled grid points at grid resolutions ranging from 0.4 to 4 ha. The IDW method consistently predicted leaf‐K concentrations between the known values with less error than rasterization. Rather than grid sampling, composite leaf samples should be collected based on management zones to provide a simplified sampling protocol. Within each management zone, a composite sample must consist of uppermost fully expanded trifoliolate leaves collected from at least 18 locations to ensure that the sample measures within the 95% confidence interval of the area average leaf‐K concentration. The developed sampling protocol coupled with the dynamic critical tissue‐K concentration curve will provide producers with the ability to effectively monitor soybean for potential hidden hunger and verify K deficiency symptoms in season.https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20439
spellingShingle Carrie C. Ortel
Trenton L. Roberts
Kyle A. Hoegenauer
Aurelie M. Poncet
Nathan A. Slaton
W. Jeremy Ross
Mapping variability of soybean leaf potassium concentrations to develop a sampling protocol
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
title Mapping variability of soybean leaf potassium concentrations to develop a sampling protocol
title_full Mapping variability of soybean leaf potassium concentrations to develop a sampling protocol
title_fullStr Mapping variability of soybean leaf potassium concentrations to develop a sampling protocol
title_full_unstemmed Mapping variability of soybean leaf potassium concentrations to develop a sampling protocol
title_short Mapping variability of soybean leaf potassium concentrations to develop a sampling protocol
title_sort mapping variability of soybean leaf potassium concentrations to develop a sampling protocol
url https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20439
work_keys_str_mv AT carriecortel mappingvariabilityofsoybeanleafpotassiumconcentrationstodevelopasamplingprotocol
AT trentonlroberts mappingvariabilityofsoybeanleafpotassiumconcentrationstodevelopasamplingprotocol
AT kyleahoegenauer mappingvariabilityofsoybeanleafpotassiumconcentrationstodevelopasamplingprotocol
AT aureliemponcet mappingvariabilityofsoybeanleafpotassiumconcentrationstodevelopasamplingprotocol
AT nathanaslaton mappingvariabilityofsoybeanleafpotassiumconcentrationstodevelopasamplingprotocol
AT wjeremyross mappingvariabilityofsoybeanleafpotassiumconcentrationstodevelopasamplingprotocol