The geopolitics of negative emissions technologies: learning lessons from REDD+ and renewable energy for afforestation, BECCS, and direct air capture
Non-technical summary Negative emissions technologies (NETs) have received increasing interest in recent years as a potential part of a portfolio of measures to address anthropogenic climate change, in particular following the 2015 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change Paris Agreement and the 2...
Main Authors: | Judith Kreuter, Markus Lederer |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Global Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059479821000247/type/journal_article |
Similar Items
-
Inefficient power generation as an optimal route to negative emissions via BECCS?
by: Niall Mac Dowell, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) in Brazil: A Review
by: Brenda H. M. Silveira, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01) -
Global economic consequences of deploying bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)
by: Matteo Muratori, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Perspectives of Biogas Plants as BECCS Facilities: A Comparative Analysis of Biomethane vs. Biohydrogen Production with Carbon Capture and Storage or Use (CCS/CCU)
by: Johannes Full, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01) -
The Economic Accessibility of CO<sub>2</sub> Sequestration through Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) in the US
by: Matthew Langholtz, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01)