Development and Evaluation of an Interprofessional Collaborative Case Conference Series in Primary Care

Abstract Introduction Many health professions training programs provide inadequate opportunities for trainees to develop the knowledge, skills, and attitudes needed for interprofessional collaboration (IPC). To address this gap, we created an interprofessional collaborative case conference (CCC) ser...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bridget O'Brien, Meg Pearson, Rebecca Shunk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association of American Medical Colleges 2014-10-01
Series:MedEdPORTAL
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mededportal.org/doi/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9937
_version_ 1818753587777372160
author Bridget O'Brien
Meg Pearson
Rebecca Shunk
author_facet Bridget O'Brien
Meg Pearson
Rebecca Shunk
author_sort Bridget O'Brien
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction Many health professions training programs provide inadequate opportunities for trainees to develop the knowledge, skills, and attitudes needed for interprofessional collaboration (IPC). To address this gap, we created an interprofessional collaborative case conference (CCC) series that provides opportunities for participants from multiple professions to learn with, from, and about each other through discussion of real patient cases and actionable strategies for care plans. Methods This publication describes a monthly hour-long CCC in which trainees from a variety of health professions facilitate and discuss medically and psychosocially complex patients from one trainee's primary care panel with the goal of developing an improved care plan for the patient. The CCC includes upwards of 20 participants from wide-ranging backgrounds and allows face-to-face, interactive brainstorming of strategies and solutions that can ultimately be incorporated into a care plan in real time. The trainee facilitator works closely with a faculty mentor to prepare and execute the CCC, including selecting an appropriate patient, identifying clear learning objectives, inviting discussants involved in the patient's care or with relevant expertise, writing up the case and discussion questions, summarizing two pertinent articles from the literature, and creating a facilitation plan to encourage participation and collaboration among all participants. The trainee also writes a postconference care plan detailing innovative ideas for the patient's care that arose during the CCC and completes a 3-month update on the status of the proposed interventions. Included herein are a comprehensive Instructor's Guide with documents and sample templates for conference preparation and follow-up. Results We used conference evaluation forms and trainee check-ins with faculty mentors to evaluate the following components of the CCC: interprofessional trainee satisfaction with the organization, facilitation, educational value, and collaborative nature of the conference; interprofessional trainee self-assessment of knowledge, skills, and attitudes related to IPC; and participants' achievement of learning objectives based on observed behaviors during the CCC, documents generated for and after the conferences, and formative assessments by peers and faculty mentors. Conference ratings were very high across the board, with scores above 4 (on a 0-5 scale) for nearly all questions. In formal curricular feedback sessions held twice a year, trainees frequently requested more such interprofessional case-based learning sessions. The CCC also led to innovative developments in patients' treatment plans. Discussion The CCC series has proven to be an effective tool in developing primary care trainees' competence in IPC and has helped to foster a culture of IPC within our program. The IPC skills that trainees develop through the CCC are expected to translate into enhanced interprofessional skills in future clinical settings beyond our training program. The CCC has also had a positive impact on the individual patients discussed, through the generation of new multidisciplinary strategies in their care plans and the creation of lasting collaborations between their providers.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T05:09:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-06fc686a95f5410eb74716ee35abe78a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2374-8265
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T05:09:44Z
publishDate 2014-10-01
publisher Association of American Medical Colleges
record_format Article
series MedEdPORTAL
spelling doaj.art-06fc686a95f5410eb74716ee35abe78a2022-12-21T21:19:55ZengAssociation of American Medical CollegesMedEdPORTAL2374-82652014-10-011010.15766/mep_2374-8265.9937Development and Evaluation of an Interprofessional Collaborative Case Conference Series in Primary CareBridget O'Brien0Meg Pearson1Rebecca Shunk21 University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine2 University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine3 University of California, San Francisco, School of MedicineAbstract Introduction Many health professions training programs provide inadequate opportunities for trainees to develop the knowledge, skills, and attitudes needed for interprofessional collaboration (IPC). To address this gap, we created an interprofessional collaborative case conference (CCC) series that provides opportunities for participants from multiple professions to learn with, from, and about each other through discussion of real patient cases and actionable strategies for care plans. Methods This publication describes a monthly hour-long CCC in which trainees from a variety of health professions facilitate and discuss medically and psychosocially complex patients from one trainee's primary care panel with the goal of developing an improved care plan for the patient. The CCC includes upwards of 20 participants from wide-ranging backgrounds and allows face-to-face, interactive brainstorming of strategies and solutions that can ultimately be incorporated into a care plan in real time. The trainee facilitator works closely with a faculty mentor to prepare and execute the CCC, including selecting an appropriate patient, identifying clear learning objectives, inviting discussants involved in the patient's care or with relevant expertise, writing up the case and discussion questions, summarizing two pertinent articles from the literature, and creating a facilitation plan to encourage participation and collaboration among all participants. The trainee also writes a postconference care plan detailing innovative ideas for the patient's care that arose during the CCC and completes a 3-month update on the status of the proposed interventions. Included herein are a comprehensive Instructor's Guide with documents and sample templates for conference preparation and follow-up. Results We used conference evaluation forms and trainee check-ins with faculty mentors to evaluate the following components of the CCC: interprofessional trainee satisfaction with the organization, facilitation, educational value, and collaborative nature of the conference; interprofessional trainee self-assessment of knowledge, skills, and attitudes related to IPC; and participants' achievement of learning objectives based on observed behaviors during the CCC, documents generated for and after the conferences, and formative assessments by peers and faculty mentors. Conference ratings were very high across the board, with scores above 4 (on a 0-5 scale) for nearly all questions. In formal curricular feedback sessions held twice a year, trainees frequently requested more such interprofessional case-based learning sessions. The CCC also led to innovative developments in patients' treatment plans. Discussion The CCC series has proven to be an effective tool in developing primary care trainees' competence in IPC and has helped to foster a culture of IPC within our program. The IPC skills that trainees develop through the CCC are expected to translate into enhanced interprofessional skills in future clinical settings beyond our training program. The CCC has also had a positive impact on the individual patients discussed, through the generation of new multidisciplinary strategies in their care plans and the creation of lasting collaborations between their providers.http://www.mededportal.org/doi/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9937Interprofessional EducationPrimary Health CareInterprofessional RelationsInterprofessional Case ConferenceSmall Group Facilitation SkillsPatient-Centered Medical Home
spellingShingle Bridget O'Brien
Meg Pearson
Rebecca Shunk
Development and Evaluation of an Interprofessional Collaborative Case Conference Series in Primary Care
MedEdPORTAL
Interprofessional Education
Primary Health Care
Interprofessional Relations
Interprofessional Case Conference
Small Group Facilitation Skills
Patient-Centered Medical Home
title Development and Evaluation of an Interprofessional Collaborative Case Conference Series in Primary Care
title_full Development and Evaluation of an Interprofessional Collaborative Case Conference Series in Primary Care
title_fullStr Development and Evaluation of an Interprofessional Collaborative Case Conference Series in Primary Care
title_full_unstemmed Development and Evaluation of an Interprofessional Collaborative Case Conference Series in Primary Care
title_short Development and Evaluation of an Interprofessional Collaborative Case Conference Series in Primary Care
title_sort development and evaluation of an interprofessional collaborative case conference series in primary care
topic Interprofessional Education
Primary Health Care
Interprofessional Relations
Interprofessional Case Conference
Small Group Facilitation Skills
Patient-Centered Medical Home
url http://www.mededportal.org/doi/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9937
work_keys_str_mv AT bridgetobrien developmentandevaluationofaninterprofessionalcollaborativecaseconferenceseriesinprimarycare
AT megpearson developmentandevaluationofaninterprofessionalcollaborativecaseconferenceseriesinprimarycare
AT rebeccashunk developmentandevaluationofaninterprofessionalcollaborativecaseconferenceseriesinprimarycare