Comparison of Post Operative Early Active and Passive Mobillization of Flexor Tendon in Zone 2
Objective: Despite numerous advances in our understanding of the anatomy, Biomechanics, nutrition and Healing, the result Following Fiewor Tendon repair Shiow relatively high rate of failure the purpost of this study was to compare the result of 50 digits treated by either ‘‘Early active mobilizatio...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fas |
| Published: |
University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences
2003-12-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Rehabilitation |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://rehabilitationj.uswr.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-3&slc_lang=en&sid=1 |
| _version_ | 1819179804261351424 |
|---|---|
| author | Fereidoun Layeghi Maryam Farzad Akram Azad |
| author_facet | Fereidoun Layeghi Maryam Farzad Akram Azad |
| author_sort | Fereidoun Layeghi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective: Despite numerous advances in our understanding of the anatomy, Biomechanics, nutrition and Healing, the result Following Fiewor Tendon repair Shiow relatively high rate of failure the purpost of this study was to compare the result of 50 digits treated by either ‘‘Early active mobilization’’ or ‘‘controlled passive mobilization’’ re gimen in Ivan hand rehabilitation center.
Materials & Mathods: Pationt being matched for gende, age, injuries hand, technique of srgery (all with eqitenon first, four strand) in two groups. They were assessed 8 week postoperatibg in respect of total active motion, flexion gap and extension lags. Outcome were defined using ‘‘Strickland’’ and ‘’ Buck – Gramko’’ criteria.
Results: The result were 80% excellent and good, 20% fair and no poor in early active motion group and in second group 40% excellent and good, 44% fair and 16% poor due to Strickland criteria. In buck-grancko criteria 52% extension and good, 32% fair and 16% were poor. Mean of total active motion was significantly greater in early active motion group (in E.A.M.150/2, in passive group: 116/41).
Conclusion: Actively mobilized tendon underwent intrinsic healing without large gap formation. Active motion generated bith tension and motion and offer several advantage over passive motion: improved tendon nutrition, less adhission, higher rate of healing, increased ultimate rang of motion. So early active motion is the best protocle for treating tendons in zons 2 our result is comparable with theory. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-22T22:04:16Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-0709ee659ddd4cffb73e18a553ac6f8a |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1607-2960 1607-2960 |
| language | fas |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-22T22:04:16Z |
| publishDate | 2003-12-01 |
| publisher | University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Rehabilitation |
| spelling | doaj.art-0709ee659ddd4cffb73e18a553ac6f8a2022-12-21T18:11:02ZfasUniversity of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation SciencesJournal of Rehabilitation1607-29601607-29602003-12-01431317Comparison of Post Operative Early Active and Passive Mobillization of Flexor Tendon in Zone 2Fereidoun Layeghi0Maryam Farzad1Akram Azad2 University of Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Objective: Despite numerous advances in our understanding of the anatomy, Biomechanics, nutrition and Healing, the result Following Fiewor Tendon repair Shiow relatively high rate of failure the purpost of this study was to compare the result of 50 digits treated by either ‘‘Early active mobilization’’ or ‘‘controlled passive mobilization’’ re gimen in Ivan hand rehabilitation center. Materials & Mathods: Pationt being matched for gende, age, injuries hand, technique of srgery (all with eqitenon first, four strand) in two groups. They were assessed 8 week postoperatibg in respect of total active motion, flexion gap and extension lags. Outcome were defined using ‘‘Strickland’’ and ‘’ Buck – Gramko’’ criteria. Results: The result were 80% excellent and good, 20% fair and no poor in early active motion group and in second group 40% excellent and good, 44% fair and 16% poor due to Strickland criteria. In buck-grancko criteria 52% extension and good, 32% fair and 16% were poor. Mean of total active motion was significantly greater in early active motion group (in E.A.M.150/2, in passive group: 116/41). Conclusion: Actively mobilized tendon underwent intrinsic healing without large gap formation. Active motion generated bith tension and motion and offer several advantage over passive motion: improved tendon nutrition, less adhission, higher rate of healing, increased ultimate rang of motion. So early active motion is the best protocle for treating tendons in zons 2 our result is comparable with theory.http://rehabilitationj.uswr.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-3&slc_lang=en&sid=1Flexor tendor in zone 2 Early active motion (EAM) Controlled pessive motion (C.P.M) Total active motion (T.A.M) |
| spellingShingle | Fereidoun Layeghi Maryam Farzad Akram Azad Comparison of Post Operative Early Active and Passive Mobillization of Flexor Tendon in Zone 2 Journal of Rehabilitation Flexor tendor in zone 2 Early active motion (E A M) Controlled pessive motion (C.P.M) Total active motion (T.A.M) |
| title | Comparison of Post Operative Early Active and Passive Mobillization of Flexor Tendon in Zone 2 |
| title_full | Comparison of Post Operative Early Active and Passive Mobillization of Flexor Tendon in Zone 2 |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of Post Operative Early Active and Passive Mobillization of Flexor Tendon in Zone 2 |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Post Operative Early Active and Passive Mobillization of Flexor Tendon in Zone 2 |
| title_short | Comparison of Post Operative Early Active and Passive Mobillization of Flexor Tendon in Zone 2 |
| title_sort | comparison of post operative early active and passive mobillization of flexor tendon in zone 2 |
| topic | Flexor tendor in zone 2 Early active motion (E A M) Controlled pessive motion (C.P.M) Total active motion (T.A.M) |
| url | http://rehabilitationj.uswr.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-3&slc_lang=en&sid=1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT fereidounlayeghi comparisonofpostoperativeearlyactiveandpassivemobillizationofflexortendoninzone2 AT maryamfarzad comparisonofpostoperativeearlyactiveandpassivemobillizationofflexortendoninzone2 AT akramazad comparisonofpostoperativeearlyactiveandpassivemobillizationofflexortendoninzone2 |