Oxygenation Performance of Different Non-Invasive Devices for Treatment of Decompression Illness and Carbon Monoxide Poisoning

Study Objective: Application of high concentrations of oxygen to increase oxygen partial pressure (pO2) is the most important treatment for patients with carbon monoxide intoxication or divers with suspected decompression illness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the oxygenation performance of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrea Köhler, Felicitas M. Zoll, Thomas Ploner, Alexander Hammer, Michael Joannidis, Herbert Tilg, Armin Finkenstedt, Frank Hartig
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Physiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2022.885898/full
_version_ 1818276204479774720
author Andrea Köhler
Felicitas M. Zoll
Thomas Ploner
Alexander Hammer
Michael Joannidis
Herbert Tilg
Armin Finkenstedt
Frank Hartig
author_facet Andrea Köhler
Felicitas M. Zoll
Thomas Ploner
Alexander Hammer
Michael Joannidis
Herbert Tilg
Armin Finkenstedt
Frank Hartig
author_sort Andrea Köhler
collection DOAJ
description Study Objective: Application of high concentrations of oxygen to increase oxygen partial pressure (pO2) is the most important treatment for patients with carbon monoxide intoxication or divers with suspected decompression illness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the oxygenation performance of various non-invasive oxygen systems.Methods: The effect of different oxygen systems on arterial pO2, pCO2 and pH and their subjective comfort was evaluated in 30 healthy participants. Eight devices were included: nasal cannula, non-rebreather mask, AirLife Open mask, Flow-Safe II CPAP device, SuperNO2VA nasal PAP device, all operated with 15 L/min constant flow oxygen; nasal high-flow (50 L/min flow, 1.0 FiO2), non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV, 12 PEEP, 4 ASB, 1.0 FiO2) and a standard diving regulator (operated with pure oxygen).Results: Diving regulator, SuperNO2VA, nasal high-flow and NPPV achieved mean arterial pO2 concentrations between 538 and 556 mm Hg within 5 minutes. The AirLife Open mask, the nasal cannula and the non-rebreather mask achieved concentrations of 348–451 mm Hg and the Flow-Safe II device 270 mm Hg. Except for the AirLife open mask, pCO2 decreased and pH increased with all devices. The highest pH values were observed with NPPV, diving regulator, Flow-Safe II and nasal high-flow but apparent hyperventilation was uncommon. The AirLife Open and the non-rebreather mask were the most comfortable, the SuperNO2VA and the nasal cannula the most uncomfortable devices.Conclusion: A standard diving regulator and the SuperNO2VA device were equally effective in providing highest physiologically possible pO2 as compared to nasal high-flow and NPPV.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T22:41:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-070f3116bbeb4984af452346e01337ff
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-042X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T22:41:56Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Physiology
spelling doaj.art-070f3116bbeb4984af452346e01337ff2022-12-22T00:09:19ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2022-04-011310.3389/fphys.2022.885898885898Oxygenation Performance of Different Non-Invasive Devices for Treatment of Decompression Illness and Carbon Monoxide PoisoningAndrea KöhlerFelicitas M. ZollThomas PlonerAlexander HammerMichael JoannidisHerbert TilgArmin FinkenstedtFrank HartigStudy Objective: Application of high concentrations of oxygen to increase oxygen partial pressure (pO2) is the most important treatment for patients with carbon monoxide intoxication or divers with suspected decompression illness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the oxygenation performance of various non-invasive oxygen systems.Methods: The effect of different oxygen systems on arterial pO2, pCO2 and pH and their subjective comfort was evaluated in 30 healthy participants. Eight devices were included: nasal cannula, non-rebreather mask, AirLife Open mask, Flow-Safe II CPAP device, SuperNO2VA nasal PAP device, all operated with 15 L/min constant flow oxygen; nasal high-flow (50 L/min flow, 1.0 FiO2), non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV, 12 PEEP, 4 ASB, 1.0 FiO2) and a standard diving regulator (operated with pure oxygen).Results: Diving regulator, SuperNO2VA, nasal high-flow and NPPV achieved mean arterial pO2 concentrations between 538 and 556 mm Hg within 5 minutes. The AirLife Open mask, the nasal cannula and the non-rebreather mask achieved concentrations of 348–451 mm Hg and the Flow-Safe II device 270 mm Hg. Except for the AirLife open mask, pCO2 decreased and pH increased with all devices. The highest pH values were observed with NPPV, diving regulator, Flow-Safe II and nasal high-flow but apparent hyperventilation was uncommon. The AirLife Open and the non-rebreather mask were the most comfortable, the SuperNO2VA and the nasal cannula the most uncomfortable devices.Conclusion: A standard diving regulator and the SuperNO2VA device were equally effective in providing highest physiologically possible pO2 as compared to nasal high-flow and NPPV.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2022.885898/fullarterial oxygen partial pressureoxygen masksdiving accidentPaO2non-invasive ventilationcarbon monoxide poisoning
spellingShingle Andrea Köhler
Felicitas M. Zoll
Thomas Ploner
Alexander Hammer
Michael Joannidis
Herbert Tilg
Armin Finkenstedt
Frank Hartig
Oxygenation Performance of Different Non-Invasive Devices for Treatment of Decompression Illness and Carbon Monoxide Poisoning
Frontiers in Physiology
arterial oxygen partial pressure
oxygen masks
diving accident
PaO2
non-invasive ventilation
carbon monoxide poisoning
title Oxygenation Performance of Different Non-Invasive Devices for Treatment of Decompression Illness and Carbon Monoxide Poisoning
title_full Oxygenation Performance of Different Non-Invasive Devices for Treatment of Decompression Illness and Carbon Monoxide Poisoning
title_fullStr Oxygenation Performance of Different Non-Invasive Devices for Treatment of Decompression Illness and Carbon Monoxide Poisoning
title_full_unstemmed Oxygenation Performance of Different Non-Invasive Devices for Treatment of Decompression Illness and Carbon Monoxide Poisoning
title_short Oxygenation Performance of Different Non-Invasive Devices for Treatment of Decompression Illness and Carbon Monoxide Poisoning
title_sort oxygenation performance of different non invasive devices for treatment of decompression illness and carbon monoxide poisoning
topic arterial oxygen partial pressure
oxygen masks
diving accident
PaO2
non-invasive ventilation
carbon monoxide poisoning
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2022.885898/full
work_keys_str_mv AT andreakohler oxygenationperformanceofdifferentnoninvasivedevicesfortreatmentofdecompressionillnessandcarbonmonoxidepoisoning
AT felicitasmzoll oxygenationperformanceofdifferentnoninvasivedevicesfortreatmentofdecompressionillnessandcarbonmonoxidepoisoning
AT thomasploner oxygenationperformanceofdifferentnoninvasivedevicesfortreatmentofdecompressionillnessandcarbonmonoxidepoisoning
AT alexanderhammer oxygenationperformanceofdifferentnoninvasivedevicesfortreatmentofdecompressionillnessandcarbonmonoxidepoisoning
AT michaeljoannidis oxygenationperformanceofdifferentnoninvasivedevicesfortreatmentofdecompressionillnessandcarbonmonoxidepoisoning
AT herberttilg oxygenationperformanceofdifferentnoninvasivedevicesfortreatmentofdecompressionillnessandcarbonmonoxidepoisoning
AT arminfinkenstedt oxygenationperformanceofdifferentnoninvasivedevicesfortreatmentofdecompressionillnessandcarbonmonoxidepoisoning
AT frankhartig oxygenationperformanceofdifferentnoninvasivedevicesfortreatmentofdecompressionillnessandcarbonmonoxidepoisoning