Reduced-port robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single-institute experience

Abstract Background Reduced-port laparoscopic gastrectomy can potentially reduce postoperative pain and improve recovery time. However, the inherent difficulty caused by the narrow manipulation angle makes this operation difficult, especially during lymph node dissection. The intrinsic advantage of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chih-Yuan Wang, Yu-Hsien Chen, Ting-Shuo Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-05-01
Series:BMC Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01645-5
_version_ 1828219183613083648
author Chih-Yuan Wang
Yu-Hsien Chen
Ting-Shuo Huang
author_facet Chih-Yuan Wang
Yu-Hsien Chen
Ting-Shuo Huang
author_sort Chih-Yuan Wang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Reduced-port laparoscopic gastrectomy can potentially reduce postoperative pain and improve recovery time. However, the inherent difficulty caused by the narrow manipulation angle makes this operation difficult, especially during lymph node dissection. The intrinsic advantage of the da Vinci® robotic system might offset this difficulty, maintaining adequate surgical quality with risks of surgical complications equal to those by the conventional four-port robotic approach. The aim of this study was to compare the reduced-port robotic approach and the conventional four-port approach in terms of postoperative pain and short-term surgical outcomes. Methods All patients who underwent radical gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection using the da Vinci Xi robotic system, including reduced-port or conventional four-port approach, were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome was postoperative pain assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS). The secondary outcomes were the number of harvested lymph nodes, operation time, length of hospital stay, and postoperative 30-day complications. Results Forty-eight patients were enrolled in the study, 10 cases in the reduced-port and 38 in the conventional four-port group. Postoperative NRS revealed no significant difference between the reduced-port and conventional four-port groups [postoperative day (POD) 1: 4.5 vs. 3, p = 0.047, POD 3: 4 vs. 3, p = 0.178]. After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in the median number of harvested lymph nodes, operation time, and length of hospital stay between the groups. The postoperative 30-day complications were more frequent in the conventional four-port group, but there was no significant difference compared with the reduced-port group after propensity score matching. Conclusions Reduced-port robotic gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection might be comparable to the conventional four-port robotic operation in terms of postoperative pain, surgical quality, and short-term outcomes. However, further studies are required to confirm our results and clarify the advantages of the robotic reduced-port approach.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T16:12:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-071b789c5a584830878ed63b7a60e7d2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2482
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T16:12:23Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Surgery
spelling doaj.art-071b789c5a584830878ed63b7a60e7d22022-12-22T03:25:51ZengBMCBMC Surgery1471-24822022-05-012211710.1186/s12893-022-01645-5Reduced-port robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single-institute experienceChih-Yuan Wang0Yu-Hsien Chen1Ting-Shuo Huang2Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial HospitalDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial HospitalDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial HospitalAbstract Background Reduced-port laparoscopic gastrectomy can potentially reduce postoperative pain and improve recovery time. However, the inherent difficulty caused by the narrow manipulation angle makes this operation difficult, especially during lymph node dissection. The intrinsic advantage of the da Vinci® robotic system might offset this difficulty, maintaining adequate surgical quality with risks of surgical complications equal to those by the conventional four-port robotic approach. The aim of this study was to compare the reduced-port robotic approach and the conventional four-port approach in terms of postoperative pain and short-term surgical outcomes. Methods All patients who underwent radical gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection using the da Vinci Xi robotic system, including reduced-port or conventional four-port approach, were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome was postoperative pain assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS). The secondary outcomes were the number of harvested lymph nodes, operation time, length of hospital stay, and postoperative 30-day complications. Results Forty-eight patients were enrolled in the study, 10 cases in the reduced-port and 38 in the conventional four-port group. Postoperative NRS revealed no significant difference between the reduced-port and conventional four-port groups [postoperative day (POD) 1: 4.5 vs. 3, p = 0.047, POD 3: 4 vs. 3, p = 0.178]. After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in the median number of harvested lymph nodes, operation time, and length of hospital stay between the groups. The postoperative 30-day complications were more frequent in the conventional four-port group, but there was no significant difference compared with the reduced-port group after propensity score matching. Conclusions Reduced-port robotic gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection might be comparable to the conventional four-port robotic operation in terms of postoperative pain, surgical quality, and short-term outcomes. However, further studies are required to confirm our results and clarify the advantages of the robotic reduced-port approach.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01645-5GastrectomyGastric cancerLymph node dissectionRobotic surgery
spellingShingle Chih-Yuan Wang
Yu-Hsien Chen
Ting-Shuo Huang
Reduced-port robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single-institute experience
BMC Surgery
Gastrectomy
Gastric cancer
Lymph node dissection
Robotic surgery
title Reduced-port robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single-institute experience
title_full Reduced-port robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single-institute experience
title_fullStr Reduced-port robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single-institute experience
title_full_unstemmed Reduced-port robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single-institute experience
title_short Reduced-port robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single-institute experience
title_sort reduced port robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer a single institute experience
topic Gastrectomy
Gastric cancer
Lymph node dissection
Robotic surgery
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01645-5
work_keys_str_mv AT chihyuanwang reducedportroboticradicalgastrectomyforgastriccancerasingleinstituteexperience
AT yuhsienchen reducedportroboticradicalgastrectomyforgastriccancerasingleinstituteexperience
AT tingshuohuang reducedportroboticradicalgastrectomyforgastriccancerasingleinstituteexperience