Time and Life in the Relational Universe: Prolegomena to an Integral Paradigm of Natural Philosophy

Relational ideas for our description of the natural world can be traced to the concept of Anaxagoras on the multiplicity of basic particles, later called “homoiomeroi” by Aristotle, that constitute the Universe and have the same nature as the whole world. Leibniz viewed the Unive...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abir U. Igamberdiev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-10-01
Series:Philosophies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2409-9287/3/4/30
_version_ 1797227334384746496
author Abir U. Igamberdiev
author_facet Abir U. Igamberdiev
author_sort Abir U. Igamberdiev
collection DOAJ
description Relational ideas for our description of the natural world can be traced to the concept of Anaxagoras on the multiplicity of basic particles, later called “homoiomeroi” by Aristotle, that constitute the Universe and have the same nature as the whole world. Leibniz viewed the Universe as an infinite set of embodied logical essences called monads, which possess inner view, compute their own programs and perform mathematical transformations of their qualities, independently of all other monads. In this paradigm, space appears as a relational order of co-existences and time as a relational order of sequences. The relational paradigm was recognized in physics as a dependence of the spatiotemporal structure and its actualization on the observer. In the foundations of mathematics, the basic logical principles are united with the basic geometrical principles that are generic to the unfolding of internal logic. These principles appear as universal topological structures (“geometric atoms”) shaping the world. The decision-making system performs internal quantum reduction which is described by external observers via the probability function. In biology, individual systems operate as separate relational domains. The wave function superposition is restricted within a single domain and does not expand outside it, which corresponds to the statement of Leibniz that “monads have no windows”.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T14:39:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-072b30272ceb4656920645643753318b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2409-9287
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T14:39:09Z
publishDate 2018-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Philosophies
spelling doaj.art-072b30272ceb4656920645643753318b2024-04-02T22:48:38ZengMDPI AGPhilosophies2409-92872018-10-013430010.3390/philosophies3040030philosophies3040030Time and Life in the Relational Universe: Prolegomena to an Integral Paradigm of Natural PhilosophyAbir U. Igamberdiev0Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3X9, CanadaRelational ideas for our description of the natural world can be traced to the concept of Anaxagoras on the multiplicity of basic particles, later called “homoiomeroi” by Aristotle, that constitute the Universe and have the same nature as the whole world. Leibniz viewed the Universe as an infinite set of embodied logical essences called monads, which possess inner view, compute their own programs and perform mathematical transformations of their qualities, independently of all other monads. In this paradigm, space appears as a relational order of co-existences and time as a relational order of sequences. The relational paradigm was recognized in physics as a dependence of the spatiotemporal structure and its actualization on the observer. In the foundations of mathematics, the basic logical principles are united with the basic geometrical principles that are generic to the unfolding of internal logic. These principles appear as universal topological structures (“geometric atoms”) shaping the world. The decision-making system performs internal quantum reduction which is described by external observers via the probability function. In biology, individual systems operate as separate relational domains. The wave function superposition is restricted within a single domain and does not expand outside it, which corresponds to the statement of Leibniz that “monads have no windows”.http://www.mdpi.com/2409-9287/3/4/30Leibnizmonadinternal quantum staterelational biologyreflexive psychologyself
spellingShingle Abir U. Igamberdiev
Time and Life in the Relational Universe: Prolegomena to an Integral Paradigm of Natural Philosophy
Philosophies
Leibniz
monad
internal quantum state
relational biology
reflexive psychology
self
title Time and Life in the Relational Universe: Prolegomena to an Integral Paradigm of Natural Philosophy
title_full Time and Life in the Relational Universe: Prolegomena to an Integral Paradigm of Natural Philosophy
title_fullStr Time and Life in the Relational Universe: Prolegomena to an Integral Paradigm of Natural Philosophy
title_full_unstemmed Time and Life in the Relational Universe: Prolegomena to an Integral Paradigm of Natural Philosophy
title_short Time and Life in the Relational Universe: Prolegomena to an Integral Paradigm of Natural Philosophy
title_sort time and life in the relational universe prolegomena to an integral paradigm of natural philosophy
topic Leibniz
monad
internal quantum state
relational biology
reflexive psychology
self
url http://www.mdpi.com/2409-9287/3/4/30
work_keys_str_mv AT abiruigamberdiev timeandlifeintherelationaluniverseprolegomenatoanintegralparadigmofnaturalphilosophy