A Mathematical Model-Based Integrated Decision-Making Approach for Lithium Battery Manufacturers Evaluation

Today, the transportation industry contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions-roughly 23% of worldwide emissions. Battery electric vehicles (BEVs) are a viable technical option since they have the ability to drastically cut emissions (e.g., up to 70% compared to gaso...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chia-Nan Wang, Kristofer Neal Castro Imperial, Nhat-Luong Nhieu, Nguyen Dang Minh Trieu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2024-01-01
Series:IEEE Access
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10452344/
_version_ 1797243264454098944
author Chia-Nan Wang
Kristofer Neal Castro Imperial
Nhat-Luong Nhieu
Nguyen Dang Minh Trieu
author_facet Chia-Nan Wang
Kristofer Neal Castro Imperial
Nhat-Luong Nhieu
Nguyen Dang Minh Trieu
author_sort Chia-Nan Wang
collection DOAJ
description Today, the transportation industry contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions-roughly 23% of worldwide emissions. Battery electric vehicles (BEVs) are a viable technical option since they have the ability to drastically cut emissions (e.g., up to 70% compared to gasoline automobiles). Lithium-ion batteries, the fundamental component of BEVs, are essential to the efficiency and performance of the vehicle. Nevertheless, it might be difficult to make the best decision given the wide range of battery producers. In order to close this gap, eleven of the top producers of lithium batteries (e.g., Tesla, Ford and Toyota) were assessed for their 2019–2021 performance. We evaluate battery performance using both the Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA) and Malmquist productivity index (MPI). According to the results, Ford, BMW, and Tesla had the greatest average MPI efficiency. Conversely, Toyota, Hyundai, and Mercedes-Benz secured the highest positions among lithium-battery manufacturers in the OPA rankings. Through the use of these methodologies, we aim to provide comparative rankings that will eventually help promote sustainable mobility by giving decision-makers, investors, consumers and other stakeholders an overview for well-informed battery selections.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T18:52:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-073a8ba8e29b480e90a79a047254799c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2169-3536
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T18:52:21Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher IEEE
record_format Article
series IEEE Access
spelling doaj.art-073a8ba8e29b480e90a79a047254799c2024-03-26T17:48:10ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362024-01-0112400374004810.1109/ACCESS.2024.337099010452344A Mathematical Model-Based Integrated Decision-Making Approach for Lithium Battery Manufacturers EvaluationChia-Nan Wang0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2374-3830Kristofer Neal Castro Imperial1https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6183-1226Nhat-Luong Nhieu2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9732-601XNguyen Dang Minh Trieu3Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, TaiwanDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, TaiwanDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, TaiwanDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, TaiwanToday, the transportation industry contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions-roughly 23% of worldwide emissions. Battery electric vehicles (BEVs) are a viable technical option since they have the ability to drastically cut emissions (e.g., up to 70% compared to gasoline automobiles). Lithium-ion batteries, the fundamental component of BEVs, are essential to the efficiency and performance of the vehicle. Nevertheless, it might be difficult to make the best decision given the wide range of battery producers. In order to close this gap, eleven of the top producers of lithium batteries (e.g., Tesla, Ford and Toyota) were assessed for their 2019–2021 performance. We evaluate battery performance using both the Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA) and Malmquist productivity index (MPI). According to the results, Ford, BMW, and Tesla had the greatest average MPI efficiency. Conversely, Toyota, Hyundai, and Mercedes-Benz secured the highest positions among lithium-battery manufacturers in the OPA rankings. Through the use of these methodologies, we aim to provide comparative rankings that will eventually help promote sustainable mobility by giving decision-makers, investors, consumers and other stakeholders an overview for well-informed battery selections.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10452344/Ordinal priority approachlithium batterydecision-makingMalmquistdata envelopment analysis
spellingShingle Chia-Nan Wang
Kristofer Neal Castro Imperial
Nhat-Luong Nhieu
Nguyen Dang Minh Trieu
A Mathematical Model-Based Integrated Decision-Making Approach for Lithium Battery Manufacturers Evaluation
IEEE Access
Ordinal priority approach
lithium battery
decision-making
Malmquist
data envelopment analysis
title A Mathematical Model-Based Integrated Decision-Making Approach for Lithium Battery Manufacturers Evaluation
title_full A Mathematical Model-Based Integrated Decision-Making Approach for Lithium Battery Manufacturers Evaluation
title_fullStr A Mathematical Model-Based Integrated Decision-Making Approach for Lithium Battery Manufacturers Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed A Mathematical Model-Based Integrated Decision-Making Approach for Lithium Battery Manufacturers Evaluation
title_short A Mathematical Model-Based Integrated Decision-Making Approach for Lithium Battery Manufacturers Evaluation
title_sort mathematical model based integrated decision making approach for lithium battery manufacturers evaluation
topic Ordinal priority approach
lithium battery
decision-making
Malmquist
data envelopment analysis
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10452344/
work_keys_str_mv AT chiananwang amathematicalmodelbasedintegrateddecisionmakingapproachforlithiumbatterymanufacturersevaluation
AT kristofernealcastroimperial amathematicalmodelbasedintegrateddecisionmakingapproachforlithiumbatterymanufacturersevaluation
AT nhatluongnhieu amathematicalmodelbasedintegrateddecisionmakingapproachforlithiumbatterymanufacturersevaluation
AT nguyendangminhtrieu amathematicalmodelbasedintegrateddecisionmakingapproachforlithiumbatterymanufacturersevaluation
AT chiananwang mathematicalmodelbasedintegrateddecisionmakingapproachforlithiumbatterymanufacturersevaluation
AT kristofernealcastroimperial mathematicalmodelbasedintegrateddecisionmakingapproachforlithiumbatterymanufacturersevaluation
AT nhatluongnhieu mathematicalmodelbasedintegrateddecisionmakingapproachforlithiumbatterymanufacturersevaluation
AT nguyendangminhtrieu mathematicalmodelbasedintegrateddecisionmakingapproachforlithiumbatterymanufacturersevaluation