A cluster randomized controlled trial to reduce office workers’ sitting time: effect on productivity outcomes
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the Stand Up Victoria intervention – a multicomponent workplace intervention that successfully reduced workplace sitting – on productivity in the short- and longer-term. METHODS: Desk-based workers [5–39 per worksite; 68% women; mean age 45.6 (st...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (NOROSH)
2019-09-01
|
Series: | Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: |
https://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=3820
|
_version_ | 1818947697798807552 |
---|---|
author | James E Peterman Genevieve N Healy Elisabeth AH Winkler Marj Moodie Elizabeth G Eakin Sheleigh P Lawler Neville Owen David W Dunstan Anthony D LaMontagne |
author_facet | James E Peterman Genevieve N Healy Elisabeth AH Winkler Marj Moodie Elizabeth G Eakin Sheleigh P Lawler Neville Owen David W Dunstan Anthony D LaMontagne |
author_sort | James E Peterman |
collection | DOAJ |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the Stand Up Victoria intervention – a multicomponent workplace intervention that successfully reduced workplace sitting – on productivity in the short- and longer-term. METHODS: Desk-based workers [5–39 per worksite; 68% women; mean age 45.6 (standard deviation 9.4) years] were cluster randomized by office worksite to receive intervention (7 worksites, 136 workers) or control (7 worksites, 95 workers). The intervention used organizational-, environmental-, and individual-level approaches to address workplace sitting. Productivity outcomes were measured via the Health and Work Questionnaire (HWQ; 10 outcomes) and Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ; 5 outcomes), administered at 0 (baseline), 3 (initial), and 12 (long-term) months. Intervention effects were assessed by linear mixed models, accounting for repeated measures and clustering, baseline values, and potential confounders. Evaluable case and multiple imputation analyses were used. RESULTS: At 12 months, trends for improvement were observed in the HWQ non-work satisfaction subscale (P=0.053) and stress item (P=0.086). Intervention effects on remaining outcomes for the HWQ were small and non-significant at both timepoints. At 3 months, intervention effects showed significant improvements in the WLQ mental demands subscale (P=0.043). At 12 months, intervention effects showed significant (P<0.05) small-to-moderate improvements in four WLQ outcomes (weighted total score, time-, mental-, and output demands), with physical demands showing a small significant worsening. Conclusions were robust to missing data assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention improved some measures of productivity at 12 months, providing important evidence to the business case supporting workplace sitting-reduction interventions. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-20T08:35:02Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-074faf0f7e194d7a958ddc1745519702 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0355-3140 1795-990X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-20T08:35:02Z |
publishDate | 2019-09-01 |
publisher | Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (NOROSH) |
record_format | Article |
series | Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health |
spelling | doaj.art-074faf0f7e194d7a958ddc17455197022022-12-21T19:46:35ZengNordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (NOROSH)Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health0355-31401795-990X2019-09-0145548349210.5271/sjweh.38203820A cluster randomized controlled trial to reduce office workers’ sitting time: effect on productivity outcomesJames E PetermanGenevieve N HealyElisabeth AH WinklerMarj MoodieElizabeth G EakinSheleigh P LawlerNeville OwenDavid W DunstanAnthony D LaMontagne0Deakin Melbourne Burwood Campus, 221 Burwood Hwy, Burwood VIC 3125, Australia.OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the Stand Up Victoria intervention – a multicomponent workplace intervention that successfully reduced workplace sitting – on productivity in the short- and longer-term. METHODS: Desk-based workers [5–39 per worksite; 68% women; mean age 45.6 (standard deviation 9.4) years] were cluster randomized by office worksite to receive intervention (7 worksites, 136 workers) or control (7 worksites, 95 workers). The intervention used organizational-, environmental-, and individual-level approaches to address workplace sitting. Productivity outcomes were measured via the Health and Work Questionnaire (HWQ; 10 outcomes) and Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ; 5 outcomes), administered at 0 (baseline), 3 (initial), and 12 (long-term) months. Intervention effects were assessed by linear mixed models, accounting for repeated measures and clustering, baseline values, and potential confounders. Evaluable case and multiple imputation analyses were used. RESULTS: At 12 months, trends for improvement were observed in the HWQ non-work satisfaction subscale (P=0.053) and stress item (P=0.086). Intervention effects on remaining outcomes for the HWQ were small and non-significant at both timepoints. At 3 months, intervention effects showed significant improvements in the WLQ mental demands subscale (P=0.043). At 12 months, intervention effects showed significant (P<0.05) small-to-moderate improvements in four WLQ outcomes (weighted total score, time-, mental-, and output demands), with physical demands showing a small significant worsening. Conclusions were robust to missing data assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention improved some measures of productivity at 12 months, providing important evidence to the business case supporting workplace sitting-reduction interventions. https://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=3820 workplaceproductivityoffice workerrctcluster randomized controlled trialsedentarysitting timeoccupationstand up victoriasittingphysical activityinterventionrandomized controlled trial |
spellingShingle | James E Peterman Genevieve N Healy Elisabeth AH Winkler Marj Moodie Elizabeth G Eakin Sheleigh P Lawler Neville Owen David W Dunstan Anthony D LaMontagne A cluster randomized controlled trial to reduce office workers’ sitting time: effect on productivity outcomes Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health workplace productivity office worker rct cluster randomized controlled trial sedentary sitting time occupation stand up victoria sitting physical activity intervention randomized controlled trial |
title | A cluster randomized controlled trial to reduce office workers’ sitting time: effect on productivity outcomes |
title_full | A cluster randomized controlled trial to reduce office workers’ sitting time: effect on productivity outcomes |
title_fullStr | A cluster randomized controlled trial to reduce office workers’ sitting time: effect on productivity outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | A cluster randomized controlled trial to reduce office workers’ sitting time: effect on productivity outcomes |
title_short | A cluster randomized controlled trial to reduce office workers’ sitting time: effect on productivity outcomes |
title_sort | cluster randomized controlled trial to reduce office workers sitting time effect on productivity outcomes |
topic | workplace productivity office worker rct cluster randomized controlled trial sedentary sitting time occupation stand up victoria sitting physical activity intervention randomized controlled trial |
url |
https://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=3820
|
work_keys_str_mv | AT jamesepeterman aclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoreduceofficeworkerssittingtimeeffectonproductivityoutcomes AT genevievenhealy aclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoreduceofficeworkerssittingtimeeffectonproductivityoutcomes AT elisabethahwinkler aclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoreduceofficeworkerssittingtimeeffectonproductivityoutcomes AT marjmoodie aclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoreduceofficeworkerssittingtimeeffectonproductivityoutcomes AT elizabethgeakin aclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoreduceofficeworkerssittingtimeeffectonproductivityoutcomes AT sheleighplawler aclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoreduceofficeworkerssittingtimeeffectonproductivityoutcomes AT nevilleowen aclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoreduceofficeworkerssittingtimeeffectonproductivityoutcomes AT davidwdunstan aclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoreduceofficeworkerssittingtimeeffectonproductivityoutcomes AT anthonydlamontagne aclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoreduceofficeworkerssittingtimeeffectonproductivityoutcomes AT jamesepeterman clusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoreduceofficeworkerssittingtimeeffectonproductivityoutcomes AT genevievenhealy clusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoreduceofficeworkerssittingtimeeffectonproductivityoutcomes AT elisabethahwinkler clusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoreduceofficeworkerssittingtimeeffectonproductivityoutcomes AT marjmoodie clusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoreduceofficeworkerssittingtimeeffectonproductivityoutcomes AT elizabethgeakin clusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoreduceofficeworkerssittingtimeeffectonproductivityoutcomes AT sheleighplawler clusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoreduceofficeworkerssittingtimeeffectonproductivityoutcomes AT nevilleowen clusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoreduceofficeworkerssittingtimeeffectonproductivityoutcomes AT davidwdunstan clusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoreduceofficeworkerssittingtimeeffectonproductivityoutcomes AT anthonydlamontagne clusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoreduceofficeworkerssittingtimeeffectonproductivityoutcomes |