A real-world experience of transition to robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) for lung resections

ObjectiveWe report our experience of transition to robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) for lung resections with the da Vinci Xi surgical system, exposing short-term results.Materials and methodsThis is a single-center, retrospective analysis of RATS lung resections performed between April 2021...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alessandro Palleschi, Giovanni Mattioni, Paolo Mendogni, Davide Tosi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1127627/full
_version_ 1827989948441034752
author Alessandro Palleschi
Giovanni Mattioni
Giovanni Mattioni
Paolo Mendogni
Davide Tosi
author_facet Alessandro Palleschi
Giovanni Mattioni
Giovanni Mattioni
Paolo Mendogni
Davide Tosi
author_sort Alessandro Palleschi
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveWe report our experience of transition to robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) for lung resections with the da Vinci Xi surgical system, exposing short-term results.Materials and methodsThis is a single-center, retrospective analysis of RATS lung resections performed between April 2021 and September 2022 during our new robotic program. The surgical approach evolved over time, starting from a four-arm approach with four incisions. Alternative RATS approaches were subsequently evaluated, such as uniportal and biportal.ResultsDuring a 17-month period, 29 lung resections were performed. Of them, 16 were lobectomies, 7 were segmentectomies, and 6 were wedge resections. The most common indication for anatomical lung resection was non-small cell lung cancer. A uniportal approach was used for two simple segmentectomies and a biportal RATS was performed in five lobectomies and two segmentectomies. A mean number of 8.1 lymph nodes and a mean of 2.6 N2 and 1.9 N1 stations were resected during surgery, and no nodal upstaging was observed. Negative resection margins were 100%. There were two (7%) conversions, one to open surgery and one to video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). Eight (28%) patients experienced complications with no 30-day mortality.DiscussionHigh-ergonomic and high-quality views were immediately observed. After some procedures, we abandoned uniportal RATS because of the possibility of arm collisions and the necessity of a VATS-skilled surgeon at the operating table.ConclusionRATS for lung resections was safe and effective, and from the surgeon's standpoint, several practical advantages over VATS were observed. Further analysis on outcomes will help better understand the value of this technology.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T00:28:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0780b076ece040aa8b7d21f956520bc7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-875X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T00:28:20Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Surgery
spelling doaj.art-0780b076ece040aa8b7d21f956520bc72023-03-15T04:55:22ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Surgery2296-875X2023-03-011010.3389/fsurg.2023.11276271127627A real-world experience of transition to robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) for lung resectionsAlessandro Palleschi0Giovanni Mattioni1Giovanni Mattioni2Paolo Mendogni3Davide Tosi4Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Unit, IRCCS Foundation Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, ItalyThoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Unit, IRCCS Foundation Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, ItalySchool of Thoracic Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, ItalyThoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Unit, IRCCS Foundation Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, ItalyThoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Unit, IRCCS Foundation Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, ItalyObjectiveWe report our experience of transition to robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) for lung resections with the da Vinci Xi surgical system, exposing short-term results.Materials and methodsThis is a single-center, retrospective analysis of RATS lung resections performed between April 2021 and September 2022 during our new robotic program. The surgical approach evolved over time, starting from a four-arm approach with four incisions. Alternative RATS approaches were subsequently evaluated, such as uniportal and biportal.ResultsDuring a 17-month period, 29 lung resections were performed. Of them, 16 were lobectomies, 7 were segmentectomies, and 6 were wedge resections. The most common indication for anatomical lung resection was non-small cell lung cancer. A uniportal approach was used for two simple segmentectomies and a biportal RATS was performed in five lobectomies and two segmentectomies. A mean number of 8.1 lymph nodes and a mean of 2.6 N2 and 1.9 N1 stations were resected during surgery, and no nodal upstaging was observed. Negative resection margins were 100%. There were two (7%) conversions, one to open surgery and one to video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). Eight (28%) patients experienced complications with no 30-day mortality.DiscussionHigh-ergonomic and high-quality views were immediately observed. After some procedures, we abandoned uniportal RATS because of the possibility of arm collisions and the necessity of a VATS-skilled surgeon at the operating table.ConclusionRATS for lung resections was safe and effective, and from the surgeon's standpoint, several practical advantages over VATS were observed. Further analysis on outcomes will help better understand the value of this technology.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1127627/fullrobotic-assisted thoracic surgeryRATSbiportaluniportallung cancerbrief report
spellingShingle Alessandro Palleschi
Giovanni Mattioni
Giovanni Mattioni
Paolo Mendogni
Davide Tosi
A real-world experience of transition to robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) for lung resections
Frontiers in Surgery
robotic-assisted thoracic surgery
RATS
biportal
uniportal
lung cancer
brief report
title A real-world experience of transition to robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) for lung resections
title_full A real-world experience of transition to robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) for lung resections
title_fullStr A real-world experience of transition to robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) for lung resections
title_full_unstemmed A real-world experience of transition to robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) for lung resections
title_short A real-world experience of transition to robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) for lung resections
title_sort real world experience of transition to robotic assisted thoracic surgery rats for lung resections
topic robotic-assisted thoracic surgery
RATS
biportal
uniportal
lung cancer
brief report
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1127627/full
work_keys_str_mv AT alessandropalleschi arealworldexperienceoftransitiontoroboticassistedthoracicsurgeryratsforlungresections
AT giovannimattioni arealworldexperienceoftransitiontoroboticassistedthoracicsurgeryratsforlungresections
AT giovannimattioni arealworldexperienceoftransitiontoroboticassistedthoracicsurgeryratsforlungresections
AT paolomendogni arealworldexperienceoftransitiontoroboticassistedthoracicsurgeryratsforlungresections
AT davidetosi arealworldexperienceoftransitiontoroboticassistedthoracicsurgeryratsforlungresections
AT alessandropalleschi realworldexperienceoftransitiontoroboticassistedthoracicsurgeryratsforlungresections
AT giovannimattioni realworldexperienceoftransitiontoroboticassistedthoracicsurgeryratsforlungresections
AT giovannimattioni realworldexperienceoftransitiontoroboticassistedthoracicsurgeryratsforlungresections
AT paolomendogni realworldexperienceoftransitiontoroboticassistedthoracicsurgeryratsforlungresections
AT davidetosi realworldexperienceoftransitiontoroboticassistedthoracicsurgeryratsforlungresections