Consistent detection of Trypanosoma brucei but not T. congolense DNA in faeces of experimentally infected cattle

Abstract Animal African trypanosomiasis (AAT) is a significant food security and economic burden in sub-Saharan Africa. Current AAT empirical and immunodiagnostic surveillance tools suffer from poor sensitivity and specificity, with blood sampling requiring animal restraint and trained personnel. Fa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Isabel Saldanha, Martha Betson, Christina Vrettou, Edith Paxton, James Nixon, Peter Tennant, Adrian Ritchie, Keith R. Matthews, Liam J. Morrison, Stephen J. Torr, Lucas J. Cunningham
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2024-02-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54857-5
_version_ 1797274979246538752
author Isabel Saldanha
Martha Betson
Christina Vrettou
Edith Paxton
James Nixon
Peter Tennant
Adrian Ritchie
Keith R. Matthews
Liam J. Morrison
Stephen J. Torr
Lucas J. Cunningham
author_facet Isabel Saldanha
Martha Betson
Christina Vrettou
Edith Paxton
James Nixon
Peter Tennant
Adrian Ritchie
Keith R. Matthews
Liam J. Morrison
Stephen J. Torr
Lucas J. Cunningham
author_sort Isabel Saldanha
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Animal African trypanosomiasis (AAT) is a significant food security and economic burden in sub-Saharan Africa. Current AAT empirical and immunodiagnostic surveillance tools suffer from poor sensitivity and specificity, with blood sampling requiring animal restraint and trained personnel. Faecal sampling could increase sampling accessibility, scale, and species range. Therefore, this study assessed feasibility of detecting Trypanosoma DNA in the faeces of experimentally-infected cattle. Holstein–Friesian calves were inoculated with Trypanosoma brucei brucei AnTat 1.1 (n = 5) or T. congolense Savannah IL3000 (n = 6) in separate studies. Faecal and blood samples were collected concurrently over 10 weeks and screened using species-specific PCR and qPCR assays. T. brucei DNA was detected in 85% of post-inoculation (PI) faecal samples (n = 114/134) by qPCR and 50% by PCR between 4 and 66 days PI. However, T. congolense DNA was detected in just 3.4% (n = 5/145) of PI faecal samples by qPCR, and none by PCR. These results confirm the ability to consistently detect T. brucei DNA, but not T. congolense DNA, in infected cattle faeces. This disparity may derive from the differences in Trypanosoma species tissue distribution and/or extravasation. Therefore, whilst faeces are a promising substrate to screen for T. brucei infection, blood sampling is required to detect T. congolense in cattle.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T15:06:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-07898443b1c145f8bea0260d12f3222b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T15:06:49Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-07898443b1c145f8bea0260d12f3222b2024-03-05T18:51:42ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222024-02-0114111510.1038/s41598-024-54857-5Consistent detection of Trypanosoma brucei but not T. congolense DNA in faeces of experimentally infected cattleIsabel Saldanha0Martha Betson1Christina Vrettou2Edith Paxton3James Nixon4Peter Tennant5Adrian Ritchie6Keith R. Matthews7Liam J. Morrison8Stephen J. Torr9Lucas J. Cunningham10Vector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical MedicineSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of SurreyRoslin Institute, University of EdinburghRoslin Institute, University of EdinburghLarge Animal Research and Imaging Facility, University of EdinburghLarge Animal Research and Imaging Facility, University of EdinburghLarge Animal Research and Imaging Facility, University of EdinburghInstitute of Immunology and Infection, University of EdinburghRoslin Institute, University of EdinburghVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical MedicineDepartment of Tropical Disease Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical MedicineAbstract Animal African trypanosomiasis (AAT) is a significant food security and economic burden in sub-Saharan Africa. Current AAT empirical and immunodiagnostic surveillance tools suffer from poor sensitivity and specificity, with blood sampling requiring animal restraint and trained personnel. Faecal sampling could increase sampling accessibility, scale, and species range. Therefore, this study assessed feasibility of detecting Trypanosoma DNA in the faeces of experimentally-infected cattle. Holstein–Friesian calves were inoculated with Trypanosoma brucei brucei AnTat 1.1 (n = 5) or T. congolense Savannah IL3000 (n = 6) in separate studies. Faecal and blood samples were collected concurrently over 10 weeks and screened using species-specific PCR and qPCR assays. T. brucei DNA was detected in 85% of post-inoculation (PI) faecal samples (n = 114/134) by qPCR and 50% by PCR between 4 and 66 days PI. However, T. congolense DNA was detected in just 3.4% (n = 5/145) of PI faecal samples by qPCR, and none by PCR. These results confirm the ability to consistently detect T. brucei DNA, but not T. congolense DNA, in infected cattle faeces. This disparity may derive from the differences in Trypanosoma species tissue distribution and/or extravasation. Therefore, whilst faeces are a promising substrate to screen for T. brucei infection, blood sampling is required to detect T. congolense in cattle.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54857-5
spellingShingle Isabel Saldanha
Martha Betson
Christina Vrettou
Edith Paxton
James Nixon
Peter Tennant
Adrian Ritchie
Keith R. Matthews
Liam J. Morrison
Stephen J. Torr
Lucas J. Cunningham
Consistent detection of Trypanosoma brucei but not T. congolense DNA in faeces of experimentally infected cattle
Scientific Reports
title Consistent detection of Trypanosoma brucei but not T. congolense DNA in faeces of experimentally infected cattle
title_full Consistent detection of Trypanosoma brucei but not T. congolense DNA in faeces of experimentally infected cattle
title_fullStr Consistent detection of Trypanosoma brucei but not T. congolense DNA in faeces of experimentally infected cattle
title_full_unstemmed Consistent detection of Trypanosoma brucei but not T. congolense DNA in faeces of experimentally infected cattle
title_short Consistent detection of Trypanosoma brucei but not T. congolense DNA in faeces of experimentally infected cattle
title_sort consistent detection of trypanosoma brucei but not t congolense dna in faeces of experimentally infected cattle
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54857-5
work_keys_str_mv AT isabelsaldanha consistentdetectionoftrypanosomabruceibutnottcongolensednainfaecesofexperimentallyinfectedcattle
AT marthabetson consistentdetectionoftrypanosomabruceibutnottcongolensednainfaecesofexperimentallyinfectedcattle
AT christinavrettou consistentdetectionoftrypanosomabruceibutnottcongolensednainfaecesofexperimentallyinfectedcattle
AT edithpaxton consistentdetectionoftrypanosomabruceibutnottcongolensednainfaecesofexperimentallyinfectedcattle
AT jamesnixon consistentdetectionoftrypanosomabruceibutnottcongolensednainfaecesofexperimentallyinfectedcattle
AT petertennant consistentdetectionoftrypanosomabruceibutnottcongolensednainfaecesofexperimentallyinfectedcattle
AT adrianritchie consistentdetectionoftrypanosomabruceibutnottcongolensednainfaecesofexperimentallyinfectedcattle
AT keithrmatthews consistentdetectionoftrypanosomabruceibutnottcongolensednainfaecesofexperimentallyinfectedcattle
AT liamjmorrison consistentdetectionoftrypanosomabruceibutnottcongolensednainfaecesofexperimentallyinfectedcattle
AT stephenjtorr consistentdetectionoftrypanosomabruceibutnottcongolensednainfaecesofexperimentallyinfectedcattle
AT lucasjcunningham consistentdetectionoftrypanosomabruceibutnottcongolensednainfaecesofexperimentallyinfectedcattle