Similarities in biomass and energy reserves among coral colonies from contrasting reef environments

Abstract Coral reefs are declining worldwide, yet some coral populations are better adapted to withstand reductions in pH and the rising frequency of marine heatwaves. The nearshore reef habitats of Palau, Micronesia are a proxy for a future of warmer, more acidic oceans. Coral populations in these...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elise F. Keister, Shelby E. Gantt, Hannah G. Reich, Kira E. Turnham, Timothy G. Bateman, Todd C. LaJeunesse, Mark E. Warner, Dustin W. Kemp
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-01-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28289-6
_version_ 1811175854794866688
author Elise F. Keister
Shelby E. Gantt
Hannah G. Reich
Kira E. Turnham
Timothy G. Bateman
Todd C. LaJeunesse
Mark E. Warner
Dustin W. Kemp
author_facet Elise F. Keister
Shelby E. Gantt
Hannah G. Reich
Kira E. Turnham
Timothy G. Bateman
Todd C. LaJeunesse
Mark E. Warner
Dustin W. Kemp
author_sort Elise F. Keister
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Coral reefs are declining worldwide, yet some coral populations are better adapted to withstand reductions in pH and the rising frequency of marine heatwaves. The nearshore reef habitats of Palau, Micronesia are a proxy for a future of warmer, more acidic oceans. Coral populations in these habitats can resist, and recover from, episodes of thermal stress better than offshore conspecifics. To explore the physiological basis of this tolerance, we compared tissue biomass (ash-free dry weight cm−2), energy reserves (i.e., protein, total lipid, carbohydrate content), and several important lipid classes in six coral species living in both offshore and nearshore environments. In contrast to expectations, a trend emerged of many nearshore colonies exhibiting lower biomass and energy reserves than colonies from offshore sites, which may be explained by the increased metabolic demand of living in a warmer, acidic, environment. Despite hosting different dinoflagellate symbiont species and having access to contrasting prey abundances, total lipid and lipid class compositions were similar in colonies from each habitat. Ultimately, while the regulation of colony biomass and energy reserves may be influenced by factors, including the identity of the resident symbiont, kind of food consumed, and host genetic attributes, these independent processes converged to a similar homeostatic set point under different environmental conditions.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T19:42:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-078c6b6daf434c15bb064fd64e53ccf1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T19:42:40Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-078c6b6daf434c15bb064fd64e53ccf12023-01-29T12:11:33ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222023-01-0113111210.1038/s41598-023-28289-6Similarities in biomass and energy reserves among coral colonies from contrasting reef environmentsElise F. Keister0Shelby E. Gantt1Hannah G. Reich2Kira E. Turnham3Timothy G. Bateman4Todd C. LaJeunesse5Mark E. Warner6Dustin W. Kemp7Department of Biology, University of Alabama at BirminghamDepartment of Biology, University of Alabama at BirminghamDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of New HampshireDepartment of Biology, Pennsylvania State UniversitySchool of Marine Science and Policy, University of DelawareDepartment of Biology, Pennsylvania State UniversitySchool of Marine Science and Policy, University of DelawareDepartment of Biology, University of Alabama at BirminghamAbstract Coral reefs are declining worldwide, yet some coral populations are better adapted to withstand reductions in pH and the rising frequency of marine heatwaves. The nearshore reef habitats of Palau, Micronesia are a proxy for a future of warmer, more acidic oceans. Coral populations in these habitats can resist, and recover from, episodes of thermal stress better than offshore conspecifics. To explore the physiological basis of this tolerance, we compared tissue biomass (ash-free dry weight cm−2), energy reserves (i.e., protein, total lipid, carbohydrate content), and several important lipid classes in six coral species living in both offshore and nearshore environments. In contrast to expectations, a trend emerged of many nearshore colonies exhibiting lower biomass and energy reserves than colonies from offshore sites, which may be explained by the increased metabolic demand of living in a warmer, acidic, environment. Despite hosting different dinoflagellate symbiont species and having access to contrasting prey abundances, total lipid and lipid class compositions were similar in colonies from each habitat. Ultimately, while the regulation of colony biomass and energy reserves may be influenced by factors, including the identity of the resident symbiont, kind of food consumed, and host genetic attributes, these independent processes converged to a similar homeostatic set point under different environmental conditions.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28289-6
spellingShingle Elise F. Keister
Shelby E. Gantt
Hannah G. Reich
Kira E. Turnham
Timothy G. Bateman
Todd C. LaJeunesse
Mark E. Warner
Dustin W. Kemp
Similarities in biomass and energy reserves among coral colonies from contrasting reef environments
Scientific Reports
title Similarities in biomass and energy reserves among coral colonies from contrasting reef environments
title_full Similarities in biomass and energy reserves among coral colonies from contrasting reef environments
title_fullStr Similarities in biomass and energy reserves among coral colonies from contrasting reef environments
title_full_unstemmed Similarities in biomass and energy reserves among coral colonies from contrasting reef environments
title_short Similarities in biomass and energy reserves among coral colonies from contrasting reef environments
title_sort similarities in biomass and energy reserves among coral colonies from contrasting reef environments
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28289-6
work_keys_str_mv AT elisefkeister similaritiesinbiomassandenergyreservesamongcoralcoloniesfromcontrastingreefenvironments
AT shelbyegantt similaritiesinbiomassandenergyreservesamongcoralcoloniesfromcontrastingreefenvironments
AT hannahgreich similaritiesinbiomassandenergyreservesamongcoralcoloniesfromcontrastingreefenvironments
AT kiraeturnham similaritiesinbiomassandenergyreservesamongcoralcoloniesfromcontrastingreefenvironments
AT timothygbateman similaritiesinbiomassandenergyreservesamongcoralcoloniesfromcontrastingreefenvironments
AT toddclajeunesse similaritiesinbiomassandenergyreservesamongcoralcoloniesfromcontrastingreefenvironments
AT markewarner similaritiesinbiomassandenergyreservesamongcoralcoloniesfromcontrastingreefenvironments
AT dustinwkemp similaritiesinbiomassandenergyreservesamongcoralcoloniesfromcontrastingreefenvironments