Is the Natura 2000 network effective to prevent the biological invasions?

Protected areas are considered effective tools to protect biodiversity from global change; however, their success against invasive alien species (IAS) is still quite unknown. The European Natura 2000 network (N2000) appears vulnerable to invasions as human activities are not prohibited, despite bein...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carlos Guerra, Rocío A. Baquero, Daniela Gutiérrez-Arellano, Graciela G. Nicola
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-10-01
Series:Global Ecology and Conservation
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989418303512
_version_ 1818033560277221376
author Carlos Guerra
Rocío A. Baquero
Daniela Gutiérrez-Arellano
Graciela G. Nicola
author_facet Carlos Guerra
Rocío A. Baquero
Daniela Gutiérrez-Arellano
Graciela G. Nicola
author_sort Carlos Guerra
collection DOAJ
description Protected areas are considered effective tools to protect biodiversity from global change; however, their success against invasive alien species (IAS) is still quite unknown. The European Natura 2000 network (N2000) appears vulnerable to invasions as human activities are not prohibited, despite being the main drivers of biological invasions. This study was carried out in the region of Castilla-La Mancha (Spain), which represents a 2.3% of the European N2000, being higher than the network surface in 52% of the European countries. We specifically (1) compared the total IAS between protected (N2000) and unprotected sites (2) analyzed the effect of an additional protection as national park or nature reserve on the total IAS; and (3) assessed the contribution of human pressure to explain the occurrence of IAS within the network. This is the first time that the approach of gap analysis was used to assess the efficacy of N2000 against IAS. We compiled 3664 georeferenced records for 95 fauna and flora species. Mean total IAS of fauna and flora were similar between protected and unprotected UTM 10 × 10 km grid cells; therefore, as expected, N2000 sites are vulnerable to IAS despite protection. Furthermore, a stricter management of human pressure under additional regulations did not seem to prevent IAS occurrence in N2000 sites. The accessibility to protected sites seems to be a relevant factor explaining the IAS occurrence. It is imperative to improve the monitoring, quality, and updating of IAS data within the network and the surrounding areas to prevent new invasions and the worsening of current negative IAS impacts. Keywords: Conservation planning, Gap analysis, Invasive alien species, Natura 2000, Protected areas
first_indexed 2024-12-10T06:25:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-079d4eec5f8a4097ae69088c079816e3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2351-9894
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T06:25:12Z
publishDate 2018-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Global Ecology and Conservation
spelling doaj.art-079d4eec5f8a4097ae69088c079816e32022-12-22T01:59:13ZengElsevierGlobal Ecology and Conservation2351-98942018-10-0116Is the Natura 2000 network effective to prevent the biological invasions?Carlos Guerra0Rocío A. Baquero1Daniela Gutiérrez-Arellano2Graciela G. Nicola3Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, E-45071, Toledo, SpainDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, E-45071, Toledo, Spain; Corresponding author.Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, E-45071, Toledo, Spain; National Commission of Natural Protected Areas, 11320, Ciudad de Mexico, MexicoDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, E-45071, Toledo, SpainProtected areas are considered effective tools to protect biodiversity from global change; however, their success against invasive alien species (IAS) is still quite unknown. The European Natura 2000 network (N2000) appears vulnerable to invasions as human activities are not prohibited, despite being the main drivers of biological invasions. This study was carried out in the region of Castilla-La Mancha (Spain), which represents a 2.3% of the European N2000, being higher than the network surface in 52% of the European countries. We specifically (1) compared the total IAS between protected (N2000) and unprotected sites (2) analyzed the effect of an additional protection as national park or nature reserve on the total IAS; and (3) assessed the contribution of human pressure to explain the occurrence of IAS within the network. This is the first time that the approach of gap analysis was used to assess the efficacy of N2000 against IAS. We compiled 3664 georeferenced records for 95 fauna and flora species. Mean total IAS of fauna and flora were similar between protected and unprotected UTM 10 × 10 km grid cells; therefore, as expected, N2000 sites are vulnerable to IAS despite protection. Furthermore, a stricter management of human pressure under additional regulations did not seem to prevent IAS occurrence in N2000 sites. The accessibility to protected sites seems to be a relevant factor explaining the IAS occurrence. It is imperative to improve the monitoring, quality, and updating of IAS data within the network and the surrounding areas to prevent new invasions and the worsening of current negative IAS impacts. Keywords: Conservation planning, Gap analysis, Invasive alien species, Natura 2000, Protected areashttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989418303512
spellingShingle Carlos Guerra
Rocío A. Baquero
Daniela Gutiérrez-Arellano
Graciela G. Nicola
Is the Natura 2000 network effective to prevent the biological invasions?
Global Ecology and Conservation
title Is the Natura 2000 network effective to prevent the biological invasions?
title_full Is the Natura 2000 network effective to prevent the biological invasions?
title_fullStr Is the Natura 2000 network effective to prevent the biological invasions?
title_full_unstemmed Is the Natura 2000 network effective to prevent the biological invasions?
title_short Is the Natura 2000 network effective to prevent the biological invasions?
title_sort is the natura 2000 network effective to prevent the biological invasions
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989418303512
work_keys_str_mv AT carlosguerra isthenatura2000networkeffectivetopreventthebiologicalinvasions
AT rocioabaquero isthenatura2000networkeffectivetopreventthebiologicalinvasions
AT danielagutierrezarellano isthenatura2000networkeffectivetopreventthebiologicalinvasions
AT gracielagnicola isthenatura2000networkeffectivetopreventthebiologicalinvasions