ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES IN THE MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISION OF THE BRAZILIAN GENETIC HERITAGE
This study plained to demonstrate the constant constitutional violation in recent Law nº 13.123/2015, which said about access to genetic resources, the protection and access to associated traditional knowledge and the sharing of benefits for conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity, and over...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
2016-06-01
|
| Series: | Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/21490 |
| Summary: | This study plained to demonstrate the constant constitutional violation in recent Law nº 13.123/2015, which said about access to genetic resources, the protection and access to associated traditional knowledge and the sharing of benefits for conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity, and overturned the Provisional Measure nº 2.186-16/2001. The recent Law took a centering position on the control and exploitation of the genetic heritage in the country, when disciplined that the Union have competence management, control and supervision of the activities described in the law, disregarding the art. 23 (sections III, VI and VIII) of the Constitution of 1988 (CF/1988). For such an understanding was made a study of Complementary Law nº 140/2011 compared with the legislation in debate, pointing generators aspects of disrespect to constitutional rule paradigm. For this study we used the hypothetical-inductive method, with explanatory qualitative research, using the literature. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1981-3694 1981-3694 |