Bluetongue Virus Infection of Goats: Re-Emerged European Serotype 8 vs. Two Atypical Serotypes

In recent years, numerous atypical Bluetongue virus (BTV) strains have been discovered all around the world. Atypical BTV strains are phylogenetically distinct from the classical BTV serotypes 1–24 and differ in terms of several biological features. For the first time, the atypical strains BTV-25-GE...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christina Ries, Martin Beer, Bernd Hoffmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-05-01
Series:Viruses
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/14/5/1034
_version_ 1797494563545284608
author Christina Ries
Martin Beer
Bernd Hoffmann
author_facet Christina Ries
Martin Beer
Bernd Hoffmann
author_sort Christina Ries
collection DOAJ
description In recent years, numerous atypical Bluetongue virus (BTV) strains have been discovered all around the world. Atypical BTV strains are phylogenetically distinct from the classical BTV serotypes 1–24 and differ in terms of several biological features. For the first time, the atypical strains BTV-25-GER2018 and BTV-33-MNG3/2016 as well as the re-emerged classical strain BTV-8-GER2018 were evaluated comparatively in a pathogenesis study in goats—the natural host of atypical BTV. A substantial number of in-contact animals were included in this study to detect potential contact transmissions of the virus. After infection, EDTA blood, ocular, nasal and oral swab samples as well as serum were collected regularly and were used for virological and serological analyses, respectively. Our study showed differences in the immunological reaction between the two atypical BTV strains (no group-specific antibody detection) and the classical BTV strain BTV-8-GER2018 (group-specific antibody detection). Furthermore, we observed an increase in the total WBC count (neutrophils and lymphocytes) in goats infected with the atypical BTV strains. No horizontal transmission was seen for all three strains. Our study suggests that the atypical BTVs used in the trial differ from classical BTVs in their immunopathogenesis. However, no evidence of direct contact transmission was found.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T01:36:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-07a50dc2491a4ae49294196474670c3c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4915
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T01:36:07Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Viruses
spelling doaj.art-07a50dc2491a4ae49294196474670c3c2023-11-23T13:32:12ZengMDPI AGViruses1999-49152022-05-01145103410.3390/v14051034Bluetongue Virus Infection of Goats: Re-Emerged European Serotype 8 vs. Two Atypical SerotypesChristina Ries0Martin Beer1Bernd Hoffmann2Institute of Diagnostic Virology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Südufer 10, 17943 Greifswald-Insel Riems, GermanyInstitute of Diagnostic Virology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Südufer 10, 17943 Greifswald-Insel Riems, GermanyInstitute of Diagnostic Virology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Südufer 10, 17943 Greifswald-Insel Riems, GermanyIn recent years, numerous atypical Bluetongue virus (BTV) strains have been discovered all around the world. Atypical BTV strains are phylogenetically distinct from the classical BTV serotypes 1–24 and differ in terms of several biological features. For the first time, the atypical strains BTV-25-GER2018 and BTV-33-MNG3/2016 as well as the re-emerged classical strain BTV-8-GER2018 were evaluated comparatively in a pathogenesis study in goats—the natural host of atypical BTV. A substantial number of in-contact animals were included in this study to detect potential contact transmissions of the virus. After infection, EDTA blood, ocular, nasal and oral swab samples as well as serum were collected regularly and were used for virological and serological analyses, respectively. Our study showed differences in the immunological reaction between the two atypical BTV strains (no group-specific antibody detection) and the classical BTV strain BTV-8-GER2018 (group-specific antibody detection). Furthermore, we observed an increase in the total WBC count (neutrophils and lymphocytes) in goats infected with the atypical BTV strains. No horizontal transmission was seen for all three strains. Our study suggests that the atypical BTVs used in the trial differ from classical BTVs in their immunopathogenesis. However, no evidence of direct contact transmission was found.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/14/5/1034atypical BTVpathogenesishorizontal transmissionanimal experimentgoatsBTV-25
spellingShingle Christina Ries
Martin Beer
Bernd Hoffmann
Bluetongue Virus Infection of Goats: Re-Emerged European Serotype 8 vs. Two Atypical Serotypes
Viruses
atypical BTV
pathogenesis
horizontal transmission
animal experiment
goats
BTV-25
title Bluetongue Virus Infection of Goats: Re-Emerged European Serotype 8 vs. Two Atypical Serotypes
title_full Bluetongue Virus Infection of Goats: Re-Emerged European Serotype 8 vs. Two Atypical Serotypes
title_fullStr Bluetongue Virus Infection of Goats: Re-Emerged European Serotype 8 vs. Two Atypical Serotypes
title_full_unstemmed Bluetongue Virus Infection of Goats: Re-Emerged European Serotype 8 vs. Two Atypical Serotypes
title_short Bluetongue Virus Infection of Goats: Re-Emerged European Serotype 8 vs. Two Atypical Serotypes
title_sort bluetongue virus infection of goats re emerged european serotype 8 vs two atypical serotypes
topic atypical BTV
pathogenesis
horizontal transmission
animal experiment
goats
BTV-25
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/14/5/1034
work_keys_str_mv AT christinaries bluetonguevirusinfectionofgoatsreemergedeuropeanserotype8vstwoatypicalserotypes
AT martinbeer bluetonguevirusinfectionofgoatsreemergedeuropeanserotype8vstwoatypicalserotypes
AT berndhoffmann bluetonguevirusinfectionofgoatsreemergedeuropeanserotype8vstwoatypicalserotypes