Lenin and Wilson in Tension

<p>The autumn of 2020 witnessed the biggest escalation of the decades-long Nagorno-Karabakh conflict since the war of 1992-4. The analysis of legal arguments raised by the Armenian and Azerbaijan sides, is influenced by the Crimean Referendum of 2014. Whereas in the latter case, the majority o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Polina Kulish, Kristina Lier
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
Series:Verfassungsblog
Subjects:
Online Access:https://verfassungsblog.de/lenin-and-wilson-in-tension/
_version_ 1818189101835223040
author Polina Kulish
Kristina Lier
author_facet Polina Kulish
Kristina Lier
author_sort Polina Kulish
collection DOAJ
description <p>The autumn of 2020 witnessed the biggest escalation of the decades-long Nagorno-Karabakh conflict since the war of 1992-4. The analysis of legal arguments raised by the Armenian and Azerbaijan sides, is influenced by the Crimean Referendum of 2014. Whereas in the latter case, the majority of the UN members condemned Russian acts, now the international community seems reluctant to take a stance, calling for a mutual ceasefire instead. Does the difference in international response display inconsistency of state practice and the prevalence of Realpolitik over the rule of international law? This contribution suggests that the incongruity is due to two different doctrines informing the scope of a right to self-determination.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-11T23:37:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-07a93cf1dd3b4693a6eb29f4006d99c2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2366-7044
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-11T23:37:28Z
publisher Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
record_format Article
series Verfassungsblog
spelling doaj.art-07a93cf1dd3b4693a6eb29f4006d99c22022-12-22T00:45:49ZdeuMax Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbHVerfassungsblog2366-70442366-7044Lenin and Wilson in TensionPolina KulishKristina Lier<p>The autumn of 2020 witnessed the biggest escalation of the decades-long Nagorno-Karabakh conflict since the war of 1992-4. The analysis of legal arguments raised by the Armenian and Azerbaijan sides, is influenced by the Crimean Referendum of 2014. Whereas in the latter case, the majority of the UN members condemned Russian acts, now the international community seems reluctant to take a stance, calling for a mutual ceasefire instead. Does the difference in international response display inconsistency of state practice and the prevalence of Realpolitik over the rule of international law? This contribution suggests that the incongruity is due to two different doctrines informing the scope of a right to self-determination.</p> https://verfassungsblog.de/lenin-and-wilson-in-tension/International Law, Nagorno-Karabakh, self-determination
spellingShingle Polina Kulish
Kristina Lier
Lenin and Wilson in Tension
Verfassungsblog
International Law, Nagorno-Karabakh, self-determination
title Lenin and Wilson in Tension
title_full Lenin and Wilson in Tension
title_fullStr Lenin and Wilson in Tension
title_full_unstemmed Lenin and Wilson in Tension
title_short Lenin and Wilson in Tension
title_sort lenin and wilson in tension
topic International Law, Nagorno-Karabakh, self-determination
url https://verfassungsblog.de/lenin-and-wilson-in-tension/
work_keys_str_mv AT polinakulish leninandwilsonintension
AT kristinalier leninandwilsonintension