Lenin and Wilson in Tension
<p>The autumn of 2020 witnessed the biggest escalation of the decades-long Nagorno-Karabakh conflict since the war of 1992-4. The analysis of legal arguments raised by the Armenian and Azerbaijan sides, is influenced by the Crimean Referendum of 2014. Whereas in the latter case, the majority o...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
|
Series: | Verfassungsblog |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://verfassungsblog.de/lenin-and-wilson-in-tension/ |
_version_ | 1818189101835223040 |
---|---|
author | Polina Kulish Kristina Lier |
author_facet | Polina Kulish Kristina Lier |
author_sort | Polina Kulish |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <p>The autumn of 2020 witnessed the biggest escalation of the decades-long Nagorno-Karabakh conflict since the war of 1992-4. The analysis of legal arguments raised by the Armenian and Azerbaijan sides, is influenced by the Crimean Referendum of 2014. Whereas in the latter case, the majority of the UN members condemned Russian acts, now the international community seems reluctant to take a stance, calling for a mutual ceasefire instead. Does the difference in international response display inconsistency of state practice and the prevalence of Realpolitik over the rule of international law? This contribution suggests that the incongruity is due to two different doctrines informing the scope of a right to self-determination.</p>
|
first_indexed | 2024-12-11T23:37:28Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-07a93cf1dd3b4693a6eb29f4006d99c2 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2366-7044 |
language | deu |
last_indexed | 2024-12-11T23:37:28Z |
publisher | Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH |
record_format | Article |
series | Verfassungsblog |
spelling | doaj.art-07a93cf1dd3b4693a6eb29f4006d99c22022-12-22T00:45:49ZdeuMax Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbHVerfassungsblog2366-70442366-7044Lenin and Wilson in TensionPolina KulishKristina Lier<p>The autumn of 2020 witnessed the biggest escalation of the decades-long Nagorno-Karabakh conflict since the war of 1992-4. The analysis of legal arguments raised by the Armenian and Azerbaijan sides, is influenced by the Crimean Referendum of 2014. Whereas in the latter case, the majority of the UN members condemned Russian acts, now the international community seems reluctant to take a stance, calling for a mutual ceasefire instead. Does the difference in international response display inconsistency of state practice and the prevalence of Realpolitik over the rule of international law? This contribution suggests that the incongruity is due to two different doctrines informing the scope of a right to self-determination.</p> https://verfassungsblog.de/lenin-and-wilson-in-tension/International Law, Nagorno-Karabakh, self-determination |
spellingShingle | Polina Kulish Kristina Lier Lenin and Wilson in Tension Verfassungsblog International Law, Nagorno-Karabakh, self-determination |
title | Lenin and Wilson in Tension |
title_full | Lenin and Wilson in Tension |
title_fullStr | Lenin and Wilson in Tension |
title_full_unstemmed | Lenin and Wilson in Tension |
title_short | Lenin and Wilson in Tension |
title_sort | lenin and wilson in tension |
topic | International Law, Nagorno-Karabakh, self-determination |
url | https://verfassungsblog.de/lenin-and-wilson-in-tension/ |
work_keys_str_mv | AT polinakulish leninandwilsonintension AT kristinalier leninandwilsonintension |