Role of ultrasound and MRI in the evaluation of postoperative rotator cuff

Rotator cuff tears are common shoulder injuries in patients above 40 years of age, causing pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. Most recurrent rotator cuff tears happen within three months. Surgical repair is often necessary in patients with large or symptomatic tears to restore shoulder f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sahu Amit Kumar, Moran Erin Kathleen, Gandikota Girish
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2023-11-01
Series:Journal of Ultrasonography
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2023.0028
_version_ 1797435632654483456
author Sahu Amit Kumar
Moran Erin Kathleen
Gandikota Girish
author_facet Sahu Amit Kumar
Moran Erin Kathleen
Gandikota Girish
author_sort Sahu Amit Kumar
collection DOAJ
description Rotator cuff tears are common shoulder injuries in patients above 40 years of age, causing pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. Most recurrent rotator cuff tears happen within three months. Surgical repair is often necessary in patients with large or symptomatic tears to restore shoulder function and relieve symptoms. However, 25% of patients experience pain and dysfunction even after successful surgery. Imaging plays an essential role in evaluating patients with postoperative rotator cuff pain. The ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are the most commonly used imaging modalities for evaluating rotator cuff. The ultrasound is sometimes the preferred first-line imaging modality, given its easy availability, lower cost, ability to perform dynamic tendon evaluation, and reduced post-surgical artifacts compared to magnetic resonance imaging. It may also be superior in terms of earlier diagnosis of smaller re-tears. Magnetic resonance imaging is better for assessing the extent of larger tears and for detecting other complications of rotator cuff surgery, such as hardware failure and infection. However, postoperative imaging of the rotator cuff can be challenging due to the presence of hardware and variable appearance of the repaired tendon, which can be confused with a re-tear. This review aims to provide an overview of the current practice and findings of postoperative imaging of the rotator cuff using magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound. We discuss the advantages and limitations of each modality and the normal and abnormal imaging appearance of repaired rotator cuff tendon.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T10:50:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-07abbfeb40144686a11f2bc2d67d2852
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2451-070X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T10:50:01Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher Sciendo
record_format Article
series Journal of Ultrasonography
spelling doaj.art-07abbfeb40144686a11f2bc2d67d28522023-12-01T07:19:20ZengSciendoJournal of Ultrasonography2451-070X2023-11-012395e188e20110.15557/jou.2023.0028Role of ultrasound and MRI in the evaluation of postoperative rotator cuffSahu Amit Kumar0Moran Erin Kathleen1Gandikota Girish21Department of Radiology, Max Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi, India2Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA2Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USARotator cuff tears are common shoulder injuries in patients above 40 years of age, causing pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. Most recurrent rotator cuff tears happen within three months. Surgical repair is often necessary in patients with large or symptomatic tears to restore shoulder function and relieve symptoms. However, 25% of patients experience pain and dysfunction even after successful surgery. Imaging plays an essential role in evaluating patients with postoperative rotator cuff pain. The ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are the most commonly used imaging modalities for evaluating rotator cuff. The ultrasound is sometimes the preferred first-line imaging modality, given its easy availability, lower cost, ability to perform dynamic tendon evaluation, and reduced post-surgical artifacts compared to magnetic resonance imaging. It may also be superior in terms of earlier diagnosis of smaller re-tears. Magnetic resonance imaging is better for assessing the extent of larger tears and for detecting other complications of rotator cuff surgery, such as hardware failure and infection. However, postoperative imaging of the rotator cuff can be challenging due to the presence of hardware and variable appearance of the repaired tendon, which can be confused with a re-tear. This review aims to provide an overview of the current practice and findings of postoperative imaging of the rotator cuff using magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound. We discuss the advantages and limitations of each modality and the normal and abnormal imaging appearance of repaired rotator cuff tendon.https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2023.0028mriultrasoundrotator cuff tearpostoperative cuff
spellingShingle Sahu Amit Kumar
Moran Erin Kathleen
Gandikota Girish
Role of ultrasound and MRI in the evaluation of postoperative rotator cuff
Journal of Ultrasonography
mri
ultrasound
rotator cuff tear
postoperative cuff
title Role of ultrasound and MRI in the evaluation of postoperative rotator cuff
title_full Role of ultrasound and MRI in the evaluation of postoperative rotator cuff
title_fullStr Role of ultrasound and MRI in the evaluation of postoperative rotator cuff
title_full_unstemmed Role of ultrasound and MRI in the evaluation of postoperative rotator cuff
title_short Role of ultrasound and MRI in the evaluation of postoperative rotator cuff
title_sort role of ultrasound and mri in the evaluation of postoperative rotator cuff
topic mri
ultrasound
rotator cuff tear
postoperative cuff
url https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2023.0028
work_keys_str_mv AT sahuamitkumar roleofultrasoundandmriintheevaluationofpostoperativerotatorcuff
AT moranerinkathleen roleofultrasoundandmriintheevaluationofpostoperativerotatorcuff
AT gandikotagirish roleofultrasoundandmriintheevaluationofpostoperativerotatorcuff