Comparison of university students’ understanding of graphs in different contexts

This study investigates university students’ understanding of graphs in three different domains: mathematics, physics (kinematics), and contexts other than physics. Eight sets of parallel mathematics, physics, and other context questions about graphs were developed. A test consisting of these eight...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maja Planinic, Lana Ivanjek, Ana Susac, Zeljka Milin-Sipus
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2013-07-01
Series:Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.020103
_version_ 1818838349736050688
author Maja Planinic
Lana Ivanjek
Ana Susac
Zeljka Milin-Sipus
author_facet Maja Planinic
Lana Ivanjek
Ana Susac
Zeljka Milin-Sipus
author_sort Maja Planinic
collection DOAJ
description This study investigates university students’ understanding of graphs in three different domains: mathematics, physics (kinematics), and contexts other than physics. Eight sets of parallel mathematics, physics, and other context questions about graphs were developed. A test consisting of these eight sets of questions (24 questions in all) was administered to 385 first year students at University of Zagreb who were either prospective physics or mathematics teachers or prospective physicists or mathematicians. Rasch analysis of data was conducted and linear measures for item difficulties were obtained. Average difficulties of items in three domains (mathematics, physics, and other contexts) and over two concepts (graph slope, area under the graph) were computed and compared. Analysis suggests that the variation of average difficulty among the three domains is much smaller for the concept of graph slope than for the concept of area under the graph. Most of the slope items are very close in difficulty, suggesting that students who have developed sufficient understanding of graph slope in mathematics are generally able to transfer it almost equally successfully to other contexts. A large difference was found between the difficulty of the concept of area under the graph in physics and other contexts on one side and mathematics on the other side. Comparison of average difficulty of the three domains suggests that mathematics without context is the easiest domain for students. Adding either physics or other context to mathematical items generally seems to increase item difficulty. No significant difference was found between the average item difficulty in physics and contexts other than physics, suggesting that physics (kinematics) remains a difficult context for most students despite the received instruction on kinematics in high school.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T03:36:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-07ac3703efdb4e2cb7be2ae75a3d6a75
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1554-9178
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T03:36:59Z
publishDate 2013-07-01
publisher American Physical Society
record_format Article
series Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research
spelling doaj.art-07ac3703efdb4e2cb7be2ae75a3d6a752022-12-21T20:37:21ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research1554-91782013-07-019202010310.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.020103Comparison of university students’ understanding of graphs in different contextsMaja PlaninicLana IvanjekAna SusacZeljka Milin-SipusThis study investigates university students’ understanding of graphs in three different domains: mathematics, physics (kinematics), and contexts other than physics. Eight sets of parallel mathematics, physics, and other context questions about graphs were developed. A test consisting of these eight sets of questions (24 questions in all) was administered to 385 first year students at University of Zagreb who were either prospective physics or mathematics teachers or prospective physicists or mathematicians. Rasch analysis of data was conducted and linear measures for item difficulties were obtained. Average difficulties of items in three domains (mathematics, physics, and other contexts) and over two concepts (graph slope, area under the graph) were computed and compared. Analysis suggests that the variation of average difficulty among the three domains is much smaller for the concept of graph slope than for the concept of area under the graph. Most of the slope items are very close in difficulty, suggesting that students who have developed sufficient understanding of graph slope in mathematics are generally able to transfer it almost equally successfully to other contexts. A large difference was found between the difficulty of the concept of area under the graph in physics and other contexts on one side and mathematics on the other side. Comparison of average difficulty of the three domains suggests that mathematics without context is the easiest domain for students. Adding either physics or other context to mathematical items generally seems to increase item difficulty. No significant difference was found between the average item difficulty in physics and contexts other than physics, suggesting that physics (kinematics) remains a difficult context for most students despite the received instruction on kinematics in high school.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.020103
spellingShingle Maja Planinic
Lana Ivanjek
Ana Susac
Zeljka Milin-Sipus
Comparison of university students’ understanding of graphs in different contexts
Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research
title Comparison of university students’ understanding of graphs in different contexts
title_full Comparison of university students’ understanding of graphs in different contexts
title_fullStr Comparison of university students’ understanding of graphs in different contexts
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of university students’ understanding of graphs in different contexts
title_short Comparison of university students’ understanding of graphs in different contexts
title_sort comparison of university students understanding of graphs in different contexts
url http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.020103
work_keys_str_mv AT majaplaninic comparisonofuniversitystudentsunderstandingofgraphsindifferentcontexts
AT lanaivanjek comparisonofuniversitystudentsunderstandingofgraphsindifferentcontexts
AT anasusac comparisonofuniversitystudentsunderstandingofgraphsindifferentcontexts
AT zeljkamilinsipus comparisonofuniversitystudentsunderstandingofgraphsindifferentcontexts