Comparative analysis of the results of standard and minipercutaneous nephrolithotripsy for staghorn stones

Introduction. There are conflicting data in the literature on the results of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) in staghorn stones.Objective. To compare the results of standard and mini-PCNL.Materials and methods. The results of PCNL in 90 patients with staghorn stones were analyzed, which w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. G. Guliev, B. K. Komyakov, A. E. Talyshinskiy, E. O. Stetsik, N. D. Verdiev
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Rostov State Medical University, State Budget Educational Institute of Higher Professional Education 2022-06-01
Series:Вестник урологии
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/544
_version_ 1826565452349833216
author B. G. Guliev
B. K. Komyakov
A. E. Talyshinskiy
E. O. Stetsik
N. D. Verdiev
author_facet B. G. Guliev
B. K. Komyakov
A. E. Talyshinskiy
E. O. Stetsik
N. D. Verdiev
author_sort B. G. Guliev
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. There are conflicting data in the literature on the results of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) in staghorn stones.Objective. To compare the results of standard and mini-PCNL.Materials and methods. The results of PCNL in 90 patients with staghorn stones were analyzed, which were divided into two groups. In the I group, 58 (64.4%) patients underwent standard PNL with a nephroscope 24 Fr, in the II group, 32 (35.6%) patients underwent mini-PCNL with an endoscope 15 Fr. The operative time and the number of postoperative complications were compared. To assess the effectiveness of PCNL, an overview radiography or native computed tomography was performed. The operation was considered successful with residual fragments less than 3 mm.Results. Operative time, number of complications and blood transfusions, the effectiveness of PCNL in groups I and II were 80.0 ± 20.6 and 96.5 ± 25.0 min, 24.1% and 15.6%, 10.3% and 3.1%, 86.2% and 84.4%. Additional interventions were resorted to in 7 (12.1%) patients in I group, and in 4 (12.5%) patients in II group. Complications in I and II groups were observed in 14 (24.1%) and 5 (15.6%) cases. The frequency of blood transfusions was significantly higher after standard PCNL (10.3% / 3.1%, p < 0.05). Complications of grade III with mini-PCNL, replacement of an incorrectly installed stent was included in 2 patients, and with standard PCNL, ureteral stenting with urine leakage through the nephrostomic tract in 2 patients, drainage of the pleural cavity in one case.Conclusion. Standard PCNL is an effective method in staghorn stones, but the number of complications after it remains higher. In selected patients with staghorn stones, the results of mini-PCNL are comparable to those of standard PCNL.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T14:22:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-07ac9f356ccc4196bf832e6c648bf7a0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2308-6424
language Russian
last_indexed 2025-03-14T10:35:59Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Rostov State Medical University, State Budget Educational Institute of Higher Professional Education
record_format Article
series Вестник урологии
spelling doaj.art-07ac9f356ccc4196bf832e6c648bf7a02025-03-02T10:59:29ZrusMinistry of Health of Russian Federation, Rostov State Medical University, State Budget Educational Institute of Higher Professional EducationВестник урологии2308-64242022-06-01102324210.21886/2308-6424-2022-10-2-32-42370Comparative analysis of the results of standard and minipercutaneous nephrolithotripsy for staghorn stonesB. G. Guliev0B. K. Komyakov1A. E. Talyshinskiy2E. O. Stetsik3N. D. Verdiev4Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University; St. Petersburg Mariinsky Hospital – Urology Centre with Robot-assisted SurgeryMechnikov North-Western State Medical UniversityMechnikov North-Western State Medical UniversityMechnikov North-Western State Medical UniversitySt. Petersburg Mariinsky Hospital – Urology Centre with Robot-assisted SurgeryIntroduction. There are conflicting data in the literature on the results of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) in staghorn stones.Objective. To compare the results of standard and mini-PCNL.Materials and methods. The results of PCNL in 90 patients with staghorn stones were analyzed, which were divided into two groups. In the I group, 58 (64.4%) patients underwent standard PNL with a nephroscope 24 Fr, in the II group, 32 (35.6%) patients underwent mini-PCNL with an endoscope 15 Fr. The operative time and the number of postoperative complications were compared. To assess the effectiveness of PCNL, an overview radiography or native computed tomography was performed. The operation was considered successful with residual fragments less than 3 mm.Results. Operative time, number of complications and blood transfusions, the effectiveness of PCNL in groups I and II were 80.0 ± 20.6 and 96.5 ± 25.0 min, 24.1% and 15.6%, 10.3% and 3.1%, 86.2% and 84.4%. Additional interventions were resorted to in 7 (12.1%) patients in I group, and in 4 (12.5%) patients in II group. Complications in I and II groups were observed in 14 (24.1%) and 5 (15.6%) cases. The frequency of blood transfusions was significantly higher after standard PCNL (10.3% / 3.1%, p < 0.05). Complications of grade III with mini-PCNL, replacement of an incorrectly installed stent was included in 2 patients, and with standard PCNL, ureteral stenting with urine leakage through the nephrostomic tract in 2 patients, drainage of the pleural cavity in one case.Conclusion. Standard PCNL is an effective method in staghorn stones, but the number of complications after it remains higher. In selected patients with staghorn stones, the results of mini-PCNL are comparable to those of standard PCNL.https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/544kidney stonesstaghorn stonespercutaneous nephrolithotripsyminipercutaneous nephrolithotripsy
spellingShingle B. G. Guliev
B. K. Komyakov
A. E. Talyshinskiy
E. O. Stetsik
N. D. Verdiev
Comparative analysis of the results of standard and minipercutaneous nephrolithotripsy for staghorn stones
Вестник урологии
kidney stones
staghorn stones
percutaneous nephrolithotripsy
minipercutaneous nephrolithotripsy
title Comparative analysis of the results of standard and minipercutaneous nephrolithotripsy for staghorn stones
title_full Comparative analysis of the results of standard and minipercutaneous nephrolithotripsy for staghorn stones
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of the results of standard and minipercutaneous nephrolithotripsy for staghorn stones
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of the results of standard and minipercutaneous nephrolithotripsy for staghorn stones
title_short Comparative analysis of the results of standard and minipercutaneous nephrolithotripsy for staghorn stones
title_sort comparative analysis of the results of standard and minipercutaneous nephrolithotripsy for staghorn stones
topic kidney stones
staghorn stones
percutaneous nephrolithotripsy
minipercutaneous nephrolithotripsy
url https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/544
work_keys_str_mv AT bgguliev comparativeanalysisoftheresultsofstandardandminipercutaneousnephrolithotripsyforstaghornstones
AT bkkomyakov comparativeanalysisoftheresultsofstandardandminipercutaneousnephrolithotripsyforstaghornstones
AT aetalyshinskiy comparativeanalysisoftheresultsofstandardandminipercutaneousnephrolithotripsyforstaghornstones
AT eostetsik comparativeanalysisoftheresultsofstandardandminipercutaneousnephrolithotripsyforstaghornstones
AT ndverdiev comparativeanalysisoftheresultsofstandardandminipercutaneousnephrolithotripsyforstaghornstones