The influence of physical and physiological cues on atomic force microscopy-based cell stiffness assessment.

Atomic force microscopy provides a novel technique for differentiating the mechanical properties of various cell types. Cell elasticity is abundantly used to represent the structural strength of cells in different conditions. In this study, we are interested in whether physical or physiological cues...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu-Wei Chiou, Hsiu-Kuan Lin, Ming-Jer Tang, Hsi-Hui Lin, Ming-Long Yeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3806741?pdf=render
_version_ 1819074983713832960
author Yu-Wei Chiou
Hsiu-Kuan Lin
Ming-Jer Tang
Hsi-Hui Lin
Ming-Long Yeh
author_facet Yu-Wei Chiou
Hsiu-Kuan Lin
Ming-Jer Tang
Hsi-Hui Lin
Ming-Long Yeh
author_sort Yu-Wei Chiou
collection DOAJ
description Atomic force microscopy provides a novel technique for differentiating the mechanical properties of various cell types. Cell elasticity is abundantly used to represent the structural strength of cells in different conditions. In this study, we are interested in whether physical or physiological cues affect cell elasticity in Atomic force microscopy (AFM)-based assessments. The physical cues include the geometry of the AFM tips, the indenting force and the operating temperature of the AFM. All of these cues show a significant influence on the cell elasticity assessment. Sharp AFM tips create a two-fold increase in the value of the effective Young's modulus (E(eff)) relative to that of the blunt tips. Higher indenting force at the same loading rate generates higher estimated cell elasticity. Increasing the operation temperature of the AFM leads to decreases in the cell stiffness because the structure of actin filaments becomes disorganized. The physiological cues include the presence of fetal bovine serum or extracellular matrix-coated surfaces, the culture passage number, and the culture density. Both fetal bovine serum and the extracellular matrix are critical for cells to maintain the integrity of actin filaments and consequently exhibit higher elasticity. Unlike primary cells, mouse kidney progenitor cells can be passaged and maintain their morphology and elasticity for a very long period without a senescence phenotype. Finally, cell elasticity increases with increasing culture density only in MDCK epithelial cells. In summary, for researchers who use AFM to assess cell elasticity, our results provide basic and significant information about the suitable selection of physical and physiological cues.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T18:18:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-07bba0e2df4045daabe6570ab069cb8e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T18:18:11Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-07bba0e2df4045daabe6570ab069cb8e2022-12-21T18:54:37ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01810e7738410.1371/journal.pone.0077384The influence of physical and physiological cues on atomic force microscopy-based cell stiffness assessment.Yu-Wei ChiouHsiu-Kuan LinMing-Jer TangHsi-Hui LinMing-Long YehAtomic force microscopy provides a novel technique for differentiating the mechanical properties of various cell types. Cell elasticity is abundantly used to represent the structural strength of cells in different conditions. In this study, we are interested in whether physical or physiological cues affect cell elasticity in Atomic force microscopy (AFM)-based assessments. The physical cues include the geometry of the AFM tips, the indenting force and the operating temperature of the AFM. All of these cues show a significant influence on the cell elasticity assessment. Sharp AFM tips create a two-fold increase in the value of the effective Young's modulus (E(eff)) relative to that of the blunt tips. Higher indenting force at the same loading rate generates higher estimated cell elasticity. Increasing the operation temperature of the AFM leads to decreases in the cell stiffness because the structure of actin filaments becomes disorganized. The physiological cues include the presence of fetal bovine serum or extracellular matrix-coated surfaces, the culture passage number, and the culture density. Both fetal bovine serum and the extracellular matrix are critical for cells to maintain the integrity of actin filaments and consequently exhibit higher elasticity. Unlike primary cells, mouse kidney progenitor cells can be passaged and maintain their morphology and elasticity for a very long period without a senescence phenotype. Finally, cell elasticity increases with increasing culture density only in MDCK epithelial cells. In summary, for researchers who use AFM to assess cell elasticity, our results provide basic and significant information about the suitable selection of physical and physiological cues.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3806741?pdf=render
spellingShingle Yu-Wei Chiou
Hsiu-Kuan Lin
Ming-Jer Tang
Hsi-Hui Lin
Ming-Long Yeh
The influence of physical and physiological cues on atomic force microscopy-based cell stiffness assessment.
PLoS ONE
title The influence of physical and physiological cues on atomic force microscopy-based cell stiffness assessment.
title_full The influence of physical and physiological cues on atomic force microscopy-based cell stiffness assessment.
title_fullStr The influence of physical and physiological cues on atomic force microscopy-based cell stiffness assessment.
title_full_unstemmed The influence of physical and physiological cues on atomic force microscopy-based cell stiffness assessment.
title_short The influence of physical and physiological cues on atomic force microscopy-based cell stiffness assessment.
title_sort influence of physical and physiological cues on atomic force microscopy based cell stiffness assessment
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3806741?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT yuweichiou theinfluenceofphysicalandphysiologicalcuesonatomicforcemicroscopybasedcellstiffnessassessment
AT hsiukuanlin theinfluenceofphysicalandphysiologicalcuesonatomicforcemicroscopybasedcellstiffnessassessment
AT mingjertang theinfluenceofphysicalandphysiologicalcuesonatomicforcemicroscopybasedcellstiffnessassessment
AT hsihuilin theinfluenceofphysicalandphysiologicalcuesonatomicforcemicroscopybasedcellstiffnessassessment
AT minglongyeh theinfluenceofphysicalandphysiologicalcuesonatomicforcemicroscopybasedcellstiffnessassessment
AT yuweichiou influenceofphysicalandphysiologicalcuesonatomicforcemicroscopybasedcellstiffnessassessment
AT hsiukuanlin influenceofphysicalandphysiologicalcuesonatomicforcemicroscopybasedcellstiffnessassessment
AT mingjertang influenceofphysicalandphysiologicalcuesonatomicforcemicroscopybasedcellstiffnessassessment
AT hsihuilin influenceofphysicalandphysiologicalcuesonatomicforcemicroscopybasedcellstiffnessassessment
AT minglongyeh influenceofphysicalandphysiologicalcuesonatomicforcemicroscopybasedcellstiffnessassessment