Fasinumab (REGN475), an antinerve growth factor monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of acute sciatic pain: results of a proof-of-concept study

Paul J Tiseo,1 Haobo Ren,2 Scott Mellis3 1Pharmacovigilance Operations and Risk Management, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA; 2Biostatitics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ, USA; 3Translational Medicine and Predictive Medicine, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tiseo PJ, Ren H, Mellis S
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2014-08-01
Series:Journal of Pain Research
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/fasinumab-regn475-an-antinerve-growth-factor-monoclonal-antibody-for-t-peer-reviewed-article-JPR
_version_ 1811315752627601408
author Tiseo PJ
Ren H
Mellis S
author_facet Tiseo PJ
Ren H
Mellis S
author_sort Tiseo PJ
collection DOAJ
description Paul J Tiseo,1 Haobo Ren,2 Scott Mellis3 1Pharmacovigilance Operations and Risk Management, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA; 2Biostatitics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ, USA; 3Translational Medicine and Predictive Medicine, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered fasinumab (REGN475), a nerve growth factor-neutralizing antibody, in patients with acute sciatic pain receiving standard of care therapy. Methods: This was a double-blind, parallel-group, proof-of-concept study. Patients with unilateral, moderate-to-severe sciatic pain of 2–16 weeks' duration were randomized to a subcutaneous dose of placebo (n=51), fasinumab 0.1 mg/kg (n=53), or 0.3 mg/kg (n=53); follow-up was 12 weeks. Pain was assessed in a daily diary using a numerical rating scale (NRS) (0= no pain, 10= worst pain) for average and worst leg and back pain. The primary efficacy end point was the area under the curve of NRS scores for average leg pain from baseline to week 4. Key secondary end points included changes in average and worst leg and back pain from baseline to the end of week 4 and to each weekly study visit. Patient functioning (Oswestry Disability Index) and concomitant analgesic use were also assessed. Safety and tolerability were evaluated by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results: Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar among the treatment groups; 141 (88.7%) patients completed the study. For the primary end point, mean ± standard deviation area under the curve values from baseline to week 4 were not significantly different between placebo (96.8±6.0) and fasinumab 0.1 mg/kg (112.7±58.3; P=0.0610) or fasinumab 0.3 mg/kg (112.4±55.8; P=0.0923). All secondary efficacy end points of changes in pain and function demonstrated responses that were similar between placebo and fasinumab groups. Incidence of TEAEs was 45.1%, 50.9%, and 64.8% in the placebo, fasinumab 0.1mg/kg, and fasinumab 0.3 mg/kg groups, respectively. The most commonly reported TEAEs included paresthesia, arthralgia, pain in extremity, and headache. Conclusion: Administration of fasinumab provided no significant clinical benefit compared with placebo for the pain or functional limitations associated with acute sciatica. Fasinumab was generally well tolerated and incidence of TEAEs appeared to be dose related. Keywords: fasinumab, monoclonal antibody, nerve growth factor, sciatica, lumbar radiculopathy
first_indexed 2024-04-13T11:36:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-07ea09715ce741fe8264818f2cc765ea
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1178-7090
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T11:36:57Z
publishDate 2014-08-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Pain Research
spelling doaj.art-07ea09715ce741fe8264818f2cc765ea2022-12-22T02:48:24ZengDove Medical PressJournal of Pain Research1178-70902014-08-012014default52353018101Fasinumab (REGN475), an antinerve growth factor monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of acute sciatic pain: results of a proof-of-concept studyTiseo PJRen HMellis SPaul J Tiseo,1 Haobo Ren,2 Scott Mellis3 1Pharmacovigilance Operations and Risk Management, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA; 2Biostatitics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ, USA; 3Translational Medicine and Predictive Medicine, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered fasinumab (REGN475), a nerve growth factor-neutralizing antibody, in patients with acute sciatic pain receiving standard of care therapy. Methods: This was a double-blind, parallel-group, proof-of-concept study. Patients with unilateral, moderate-to-severe sciatic pain of 2–16 weeks' duration were randomized to a subcutaneous dose of placebo (n=51), fasinumab 0.1 mg/kg (n=53), or 0.3 mg/kg (n=53); follow-up was 12 weeks. Pain was assessed in a daily diary using a numerical rating scale (NRS) (0= no pain, 10= worst pain) for average and worst leg and back pain. The primary efficacy end point was the area under the curve of NRS scores for average leg pain from baseline to week 4. Key secondary end points included changes in average and worst leg and back pain from baseline to the end of week 4 and to each weekly study visit. Patient functioning (Oswestry Disability Index) and concomitant analgesic use were also assessed. Safety and tolerability were evaluated by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results: Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar among the treatment groups; 141 (88.7%) patients completed the study. For the primary end point, mean ± standard deviation area under the curve values from baseline to week 4 were not significantly different between placebo (96.8±6.0) and fasinumab 0.1 mg/kg (112.7±58.3; P=0.0610) or fasinumab 0.3 mg/kg (112.4±55.8; P=0.0923). All secondary efficacy end points of changes in pain and function demonstrated responses that were similar between placebo and fasinumab groups. Incidence of TEAEs was 45.1%, 50.9%, and 64.8% in the placebo, fasinumab 0.1mg/kg, and fasinumab 0.3 mg/kg groups, respectively. The most commonly reported TEAEs included paresthesia, arthralgia, pain in extremity, and headache. Conclusion: Administration of fasinumab provided no significant clinical benefit compared with placebo for the pain or functional limitations associated with acute sciatica. Fasinumab was generally well tolerated and incidence of TEAEs appeared to be dose related. Keywords: fasinumab, monoclonal antibody, nerve growth factor, sciatica, lumbar radiculopathyhttp://www.dovepress.com/fasinumab-regn475-an-antinerve-growth-factor-monoclonal-antibody-for-t-peer-reviewed-article-JPR
spellingShingle Tiseo PJ
Ren H
Mellis S
Fasinumab (REGN475), an antinerve growth factor monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of acute sciatic pain: results of a proof-of-concept study
Journal of Pain Research
title Fasinumab (REGN475), an antinerve growth factor monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of acute sciatic pain: results of a proof-of-concept study
title_full Fasinumab (REGN475), an antinerve growth factor monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of acute sciatic pain: results of a proof-of-concept study
title_fullStr Fasinumab (REGN475), an antinerve growth factor monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of acute sciatic pain: results of a proof-of-concept study
title_full_unstemmed Fasinumab (REGN475), an antinerve growth factor monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of acute sciatic pain: results of a proof-of-concept study
title_short Fasinumab (REGN475), an antinerve growth factor monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of acute sciatic pain: results of a proof-of-concept study
title_sort fasinumab regn475 an antinerve growth factor monoclonal antibody for the treatment of acute sciatic pain results of a proof of concept study
url http://www.dovepress.com/fasinumab-regn475-an-antinerve-growth-factor-monoclonal-antibody-for-t-peer-reviewed-article-JPR
work_keys_str_mv AT tiseopj fasinumabregn475anantinervegrowthfactormonoclonalantibodyforthetreatmentofacutesciaticpainresultsofaproofofconceptstudy
AT renh fasinumabregn475anantinervegrowthfactormonoclonalantibodyforthetreatmentofacutesciaticpainresultsofaproofofconceptstudy
AT melliss fasinumabregn475anantinervegrowthfactormonoclonalantibodyforthetreatmentofacutesciaticpainresultsofaproofofconceptstudy