Validating a transnational fracture treatment registry using a standardized method
Abstract Aim Subsequent to a three-month pilot phase, recruiting patients for the newly established BFCC (Baltic Fracture Competence Centre) transnational fracture registry, a validation of the data quality needed to be carried out, applying a standardized method. Method During the literature resear...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2019-12-01
|
| Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0862-1 |
| _version_ | 1818589641863856128 |
|---|---|
| author | Jasper Frese Annalice Gode Gerhard Heinrichs Armin Will Arndt-Peter Schulz |
| author_facet | Jasper Frese Annalice Gode Gerhard Heinrichs Armin Will Arndt-Peter Schulz |
| author_sort | Jasper Frese |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Aim Subsequent to a three-month pilot phase, recruiting patients for the newly established BFCC (Baltic Fracture Competence Centre) transnational fracture registry, a validation of the data quality needed to be carried out, applying a standardized method. Method During the literature research, the method of “adaptive monitoring” fulfilled the requirements of the registry and was applied. It consisted of a three-step audit process; firstly, scoring of the overall data quality, followed by source data verification of a sample size, relative to the scoring result, and finally, feedback to the registry on measures to improve data quality. Statistical methods for scoring of data quality and visualisation of discrepancies between registry data and source data were developed and applied. Results Initially, the data quality of the registry scored as medium. During source data verification, missing items in the registry, causing medium data quality, turned out to be absent in the source as well. A subsequent adaptation of the score evaluated the registry’s data quality as good. It was suggested to add variables to some items in order to improve the accuracy of the registry. Discussion The application of the method of adaptive monitoring has only been published by Jacke et al., with a similar improvement of the scoring result following the audit process. Displaying data from the registry in graphs helped to find missing items and discover issues with data formats. Graphically comparing the degree of agreement between the registry and source data allowed to discover systematic faults. Conclusions The method of adaptive monitoring gives a substantiated guideline for systematically evaluating and monitoring a registry’s data quality and is currently second to none. The resulting transparency of the registry’s data quality could be helpful in annual reports, as published by most major registries. As the method has been rarely applied, further successive applications in established registries would be desirable. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-16T09:43:53Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-07f06c73e4d04e8ab372f3b01f9ac788 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1471-2288 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-16T09:43:53Z |
| publishDate | 2019-12-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
| spelling | doaj.art-07f06c73e4d04e8ab372f3b01f9ac7882022-12-21T22:36:12ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882019-12-0119111110.1186/s12874-019-0862-1Validating a transnational fracture treatment registry using a standardized methodJasper Frese0Annalice Gode1Gerhard Heinrichs2Armin Will3Arndt-Peter Schulz4UKSH Campus Lübeck, Orthopaedics and TraumatologyUKSH Campus Lübeck, Orthopaedics and TraumatologyUKSH Campus Lübeck, Orthopaedics and TraumatologyUKSH Campus Lübeck, Stabsstelle InformationstechnologieKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, BG Klinikum HamburgAbstract Aim Subsequent to a three-month pilot phase, recruiting patients for the newly established BFCC (Baltic Fracture Competence Centre) transnational fracture registry, a validation of the data quality needed to be carried out, applying a standardized method. Method During the literature research, the method of “adaptive monitoring” fulfilled the requirements of the registry and was applied. It consisted of a three-step audit process; firstly, scoring of the overall data quality, followed by source data verification of a sample size, relative to the scoring result, and finally, feedback to the registry on measures to improve data quality. Statistical methods for scoring of data quality and visualisation of discrepancies between registry data and source data were developed and applied. Results Initially, the data quality of the registry scored as medium. During source data verification, missing items in the registry, causing medium data quality, turned out to be absent in the source as well. A subsequent adaptation of the score evaluated the registry’s data quality as good. It was suggested to add variables to some items in order to improve the accuracy of the registry. Discussion The application of the method of adaptive monitoring has only been published by Jacke et al., with a similar improvement of the scoring result following the audit process. Displaying data from the registry in graphs helped to find missing items and discover issues with data formats. Graphically comparing the degree of agreement between the registry and source data allowed to discover systematic faults. Conclusions The method of adaptive monitoring gives a substantiated guideline for systematically evaluating and monitoring a registry’s data quality and is currently second to none. The resulting transparency of the registry’s data quality could be helpful in annual reports, as published by most major registries. As the method has been rarely applied, further successive applications in established registries would be desirable.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0862-1Data validationRegistryQuality assessmentScoringData quality |
| spellingShingle | Jasper Frese Annalice Gode Gerhard Heinrichs Armin Will Arndt-Peter Schulz Validating a transnational fracture treatment registry using a standardized method BMC Medical Research Methodology Data validation Registry Quality assessment Scoring Data quality |
| title | Validating a transnational fracture treatment registry using a standardized method |
| title_full | Validating a transnational fracture treatment registry using a standardized method |
| title_fullStr | Validating a transnational fracture treatment registry using a standardized method |
| title_full_unstemmed | Validating a transnational fracture treatment registry using a standardized method |
| title_short | Validating a transnational fracture treatment registry using a standardized method |
| title_sort | validating a transnational fracture treatment registry using a standardized method |
| topic | Data validation Registry Quality assessment Scoring Data quality |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0862-1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jasperfrese validatingatransnationalfracturetreatmentregistryusingastandardizedmethod AT annalicegode validatingatransnationalfracturetreatmentregistryusingastandardizedmethod AT gerhardheinrichs validatingatransnationalfracturetreatmentregistryusingastandardizedmethod AT arminwill validatingatransnationalfracturetreatmentregistryusingastandardizedmethod AT arndtpeterschulz validatingatransnationalfracturetreatmentregistryusingastandardizedmethod |