Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives
Despite the plethora of empirical studies conducted to date, debate continues about whether and to what extent results should be returned to participants of genomic research. We aimed to systematically review the empirical literature exploring stakeholders’ perspectives on return of individual resea...
Main Authors: | Danya F. Vears, Joel T. Minion, Stephanie J. Roberts, James Cummings, Mavis Machirori, Mwenza Blell, Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne, Lorraine Cowley, Stephanie O. M. Dyke, Clara Gaff, Robert Green, Alison Hall, Amber L. Johns, Bartha M. Knoppers, Stephanie Mulrine, Christine Patch, Eva Winkler, Madeleine J. Murtagh |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8575249/?tool=EBI |
Similar Items
-
Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives.
by: Danya F Vears, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Beyond trust: Amplifying unheard voices on concerns about harm resulting from health data-sharing
by: Stephanie Mulrine, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01) -
The ECOUTER methodology for stakeholder engagement in translational research
by: Madeleine J. Murtagh, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01) -
Engaged genomic science produces better and fairer outcomes: an engagement framework for engaging and involving participants, patients and publics in genomics research and healthcare implementation [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Joel T. Minion, et al.
Published: (2021-11-01) -
What does engagement mean to participants in longitudinal cohort studies? A qualitative study
by: Cynthia A. Ochieng, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)