The efficiency of different estimation methods of hydro-physical limits

The soil water available to crops is defined by specific values of water potential limits. Underlying the estimation of hydro-physical limits, identified as permanent wilting point (PWP) and field capacity (FC), is the selection of a suitable method based on a multi-criteria analysis that is not alw...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emma María Martínez, Tomas Serafín Cuesta, Javier José Cancela
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 2012-12-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832012000600009&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1819059099058307072
author Emma María Martínez
Tomas Serafín Cuesta
Javier José Cancela
author_facet Emma María Martínez
Tomas Serafín Cuesta
Javier José Cancela
author_sort Emma María Martínez
collection DOAJ
description The soil water available to crops is defined by specific values of water potential limits. Underlying the estimation of hydro-physical limits, identified as permanent wilting point (PWP) and field capacity (FC), is the selection of a suitable method based on a multi-criteria analysis that is not always clear and defined. In this kind of analysis, the time required for measurements must be taken into consideration as well as other external measurement factors, e.g., the reliability and suitability of the study area, measurement uncertainty, cost, effort and labour invested. In this paper, the efficiency of different methods for determining hydro-physical limits is evaluated by using indices that allow for the calculation of efficiency in terms of effort and cost. The analysis evaluates both direct determination methods (pressure plate - PP and water activity meter - WAM) and indirect estimation methods (pedotransfer functions - PTFs). The PTFs must be validated for the area of interest before use, but the time and cost associated with this validation are not included in the cost of analysis. Compared to the other methods, the combined use of PP and WAM to determine hydro-physical limits differs significantly in time and cost required and quality of information. For direct methods, increasing sample size significantly reduces cost and time. This paper assesses the effectiveness of combining a general analysis based on efficiency indices and more specific analyses based on the different influencing factors, which were considered separately so as not to mask potential benefits or drawbacks that are not evidenced in efficiency estimation.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T14:05:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0807389f3d774c8ab15a263da35f020f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1806-9657
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T14:05:42Z
publishDate 2012-12-01
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
record_format Article
series Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
spelling doaj.art-0807389f3d774c8ab15a263da35f020f2022-12-21T19:01:14ZengSociedade Brasileira de Ciência do SoloRevista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo1806-96572012-12-013661756176810.1590/S0100-06832012000600009S0100-06832012000600009The efficiency of different estimation methods of hydro-physical limitsEmma María Martínez0Tomas Serafín Cuesta1Javier José Cancela2Escuela Politécnica SuperiorEscuela Politécnica SuperiorEscuela Politécnica SuperiorThe soil water available to crops is defined by specific values of water potential limits. Underlying the estimation of hydro-physical limits, identified as permanent wilting point (PWP) and field capacity (FC), is the selection of a suitable method based on a multi-criteria analysis that is not always clear and defined. In this kind of analysis, the time required for measurements must be taken into consideration as well as other external measurement factors, e.g., the reliability and suitability of the study area, measurement uncertainty, cost, effort and labour invested. In this paper, the efficiency of different methods for determining hydro-physical limits is evaluated by using indices that allow for the calculation of efficiency in terms of effort and cost. The analysis evaluates both direct determination methods (pressure plate - PP and water activity meter - WAM) and indirect estimation methods (pedotransfer functions - PTFs). The PTFs must be validated for the area of interest before use, but the time and cost associated with this validation are not included in the cost of analysis. Compared to the other methods, the combined use of PP and WAM to determine hydro-physical limits differs significantly in time and cost required and quality of information. For direct methods, increasing sample size significantly reduces cost and time. This paper assesses the effectiveness of combining a general analysis based on efficiency indices and more specific analyses based on the different influencing factors, which were considered separately so as not to mask potential benefits or drawbacks that are not evidenced in efficiency estimation.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832012000600009&lng=en&tlng=encapacidade de campoponto de murcha permanentefunções de pedotransferênciapsicrômetro WP4
spellingShingle Emma María Martínez
Tomas Serafín Cuesta
Javier José Cancela
The efficiency of different estimation methods of hydro-physical limits
Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
capacidade de campo
ponto de murcha permanente
funções de pedotransferência
psicrômetro WP4
title The efficiency of different estimation methods of hydro-physical limits
title_full The efficiency of different estimation methods of hydro-physical limits
title_fullStr The efficiency of different estimation methods of hydro-physical limits
title_full_unstemmed The efficiency of different estimation methods of hydro-physical limits
title_short The efficiency of different estimation methods of hydro-physical limits
title_sort efficiency of different estimation methods of hydro physical limits
topic capacidade de campo
ponto de murcha permanente
funções de pedotransferência
psicrômetro WP4
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832012000600009&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT emmamariamartinez theefficiencyofdifferentestimationmethodsofhydrophysicallimits
AT tomasserafincuesta theefficiencyofdifferentestimationmethodsofhydrophysicallimits
AT javierjosecancela theefficiencyofdifferentestimationmethodsofhydrophysicallimits
AT emmamariamartinez efficiencyofdifferentestimationmethodsofhydrophysicallimits
AT tomasserafincuesta efficiencyofdifferentestimationmethodsofhydrophysicallimits
AT javierjosecancela efficiencyofdifferentestimationmethodsofhydrophysicallimits