Closed testing using surrogate hypotheses with restricted alternatives.

<h4>Introduction</h4>The closed testing principle provides strong control of the type I error probabilities of tests of a set of hypotheses that are closed under intersection such that a given hypothesis H can only be tested and rejected at level α if all intersection hypotheses containi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John M Lachin, Ionut Bebu, Michael D Larsen, Naji Younes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219520
_version_ 1819145969975951360
author John M Lachin
Ionut Bebu
Michael D Larsen
Naji Younes
author_facet John M Lachin
Ionut Bebu
Michael D Larsen
Naji Younes
author_sort John M Lachin
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Introduction</h4>The closed testing principle provides strong control of the type I error probabilities of tests of a set of hypotheses that are closed under intersection such that a given hypothesis H can only be tested and rejected at level α if all intersection hypotheses containing that hypothesis are also tested and rejected at level α. For the higher order hypotheses, multivariate tests (> 1df) are generally employed. However, such tests are directed to an omnibus alternative hypothesis of a difference in any direction for any component that may be less meaningful than a test directed against a restricted alternative hypothesis of interest.<h4>Methods</h4>Herein we describe applications of this principle using an α-level test of a surrogate hypothesis [Formula: see text] such that the type I error probability is preserved if [Formula: see text] such that rejection of [Formula: see text] implies rejection of H. Applications include the analysis of multiple event times in a Wei-Lachin test against a one-directional alternative, a test of the treatment group difference in the means of K repeated measures using a 1 df test of the difference in the longitudinal LSMEANS, and analyses within subgroups when a test of treatment by subgroup interaction is significant. In such cases the successive higher order surrogate tests can be aimed at detecting parameter values that fall within a more desirable restricted subspace of the global alternative hypothesis parameter space.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Closed testing using α-level tests of surrogate hypotheses will protect the type I error probability and detect specific alternatives of interest, as opposed to the global alternative hypothesis of any difference in any direction.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T13:06:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0817a33e4bdb45b191d6827368741945
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T13:06:29Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-0817a33e4bdb45b191d68273687419452022-12-21T18:24:51ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01147e021952010.1371/journal.pone.0219520Closed testing using surrogate hypotheses with restricted alternatives.John M LachinIonut BebuMichael D LarsenNaji Younes<h4>Introduction</h4>The closed testing principle provides strong control of the type I error probabilities of tests of a set of hypotheses that are closed under intersection such that a given hypothesis H can only be tested and rejected at level α if all intersection hypotheses containing that hypothesis are also tested and rejected at level α. For the higher order hypotheses, multivariate tests (> 1df) are generally employed. However, such tests are directed to an omnibus alternative hypothesis of a difference in any direction for any component that may be less meaningful than a test directed against a restricted alternative hypothesis of interest.<h4>Methods</h4>Herein we describe applications of this principle using an α-level test of a surrogate hypothesis [Formula: see text] such that the type I error probability is preserved if [Formula: see text] such that rejection of [Formula: see text] implies rejection of H. Applications include the analysis of multiple event times in a Wei-Lachin test against a one-directional alternative, a test of the treatment group difference in the means of K repeated measures using a 1 df test of the difference in the longitudinal LSMEANS, and analyses within subgroups when a test of treatment by subgroup interaction is significant. In such cases the successive higher order surrogate tests can be aimed at detecting parameter values that fall within a more desirable restricted subspace of the global alternative hypothesis parameter space.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Closed testing using α-level tests of surrogate hypotheses will protect the type I error probability and detect specific alternatives of interest, as opposed to the global alternative hypothesis of any difference in any direction.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219520
spellingShingle John M Lachin
Ionut Bebu
Michael D Larsen
Naji Younes
Closed testing using surrogate hypotheses with restricted alternatives.
PLoS ONE
title Closed testing using surrogate hypotheses with restricted alternatives.
title_full Closed testing using surrogate hypotheses with restricted alternatives.
title_fullStr Closed testing using surrogate hypotheses with restricted alternatives.
title_full_unstemmed Closed testing using surrogate hypotheses with restricted alternatives.
title_short Closed testing using surrogate hypotheses with restricted alternatives.
title_sort closed testing using surrogate hypotheses with restricted alternatives
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219520
work_keys_str_mv AT johnmlachin closedtestingusingsurrogatehypotheseswithrestrictedalternatives
AT ionutbebu closedtestingusingsurrogatehypotheseswithrestrictedalternatives
AT michaeldlarsen closedtestingusingsurrogatehypotheseswithrestrictedalternatives
AT najiyounes closedtestingusingsurrogatehypotheseswithrestrictedalternatives