Implementation and Validation of an Automated, Longitudinal Robotic Surgical Evaluation and Feedback Program at a High-volume Center and Impact on Training

Background: Surgical education lacks a standardized, proficiency-based approach to evaluation and feedback. Objective: To assess the implementation and reception (ie, feasibility) of an automated, standardized, longitudinal surgical skill assessment and feedback system, and identify baseline trainee...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rand N. Wilcox Vanden Berg, Emily A. Vertosick, Daniel D. Sjoberg, Eugene K. Cha, Jonathan A. Coleman, Timothy F. Donahue, James A. Eastham, Behfar Ehdaie, Vincent P. Laudone, Eugene J. Pietzak, Robert C. Smith, Alvin C. Goh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-04-01
Series:European Urology Open Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168324002714
_version_ 1797235441310629888
author Rand N. Wilcox Vanden Berg
Emily A. Vertosick
Daniel D. Sjoberg
Eugene K. Cha
Jonathan A. Coleman
Timothy F. Donahue
James A. Eastham
Behfar Ehdaie
Vincent P. Laudone
Eugene J. Pietzak
Robert C. Smith
Alvin C. Goh
author_facet Rand N. Wilcox Vanden Berg
Emily A. Vertosick
Daniel D. Sjoberg
Eugene K. Cha
Jonathan A. Coleman
Timothy F. Donahue
James A. Eastham
Behfar Ehdaie
Vincent P. Laudone
Eugene J. Pietzak
Robert C. Smith
Alvin C. Goh
author_sort Rand N. Wilcox Vanden Berg
collection DOAJ
description Background: Surgical education lacks a standardized, proficiency-based approach to evaluation and feedback. Objective: To assess the implementation and reception (ie, feasibility) of an automated, standardized, longitudinal surgical skill assessment and feedback system, and identify baseline trainee (resident and fellow) characteristics associated with achieving proficiency in robotic surgery while learning robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Design, setting, and participants: A quality improvement study assessing a pilot of a surgical experience tracking program was conducted over 1 yr. Participants were six fellows, eight residents, and nine attending surgeons at a tertiary cancer center. Intervention: Trainees underwent baseline self-assessment. After each surgery, an evaluation was completed independently by the trainee and attending surgeons. Performance was rated on a five-point anchored Likert scale (trainees were considered “proficient” when attending surgeons’ rating was ≥4). Technical skills were assessed using the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) and Prostatectomy Assessment and Competency Evaluation (PACE). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Program success and utility were assessed by evaluating completion rates, evaluation completion times, and concordance rates between attending and trainee surgeons, and exit surveys. Baseline characteristics were assessed to determine associations with achieving proficiency. Results and limitations: Completion rates for trainees and attending surgeons were 72% and 77%, respectively. Fellows performed more steps/cases than residents (median [interquartile range]: 5 [3–7] and 3 [2–4], respectively; p < 0.01). Prior completion of robotics or laparoscopic skill courses and surgical experience measures were associated with achieving proficiency in multiple surgical steps and GEARS domains. Interclass correlation coefficients on individual components were 0.27–0.47 on GEARS domains. Conclusions: An automated surgical experience tracker with structured, longitudinal evaluation and feedback can be implemented with good participation and minimal participant time commitment, and can guide curricular development in a proficiency-based education program by identifying modifiable factors associated with proficiency, individualizing education, and identifying improvement areas within the education program. Patient summary: An automated, standardized, longitudinal surgical skill assessment and feedback system can be implemented successfully in surgical education settings and used to inform education plans and predict trainee proficiency.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T13:58:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0818a6fe6d524cd99f3ec36c5ed129cd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-1683
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T16:48:00Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series European Urology Open Science
spelling doaj.art-0818a6fe6d524cd99f3ec36c5ed129cd2024-03-29T05:51:13ZengElsevierEuropean Urology Open Science2666-16832024-04-01628190Implementation and Validation of an Automated, Longitudinal Robotic Surgical Evaluation and Feedback Program at a High-volume Center and Impact on TrainingRand N. Wilcox Vanden Berg0Emily A. Vertosick1Daniel D. Sjoberg2Eugene K. Cha3Jonathan A. Coleman4Timothy F. Donahue5James A. Eastham6Behfar Ehdaie7Vincent P. Laudone8Eugene J. Pietzak9Robert C. Smith10Alvin C. Goh11Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USADepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USADepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USAUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USAUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USAUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USAUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USAUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USAUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USAUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USAUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USAUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Corresponding author. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 353 E. 68th St, K512, New York, NY 10065, USA. Tel. +1 (646) 422-4667; Fax: +1 (212) 988-0760.Background: Surgical education lacks a standardized, proficiency-based approach to evaluation and feedback. Objective: To assess the implementation and reception (ie, feasibility) of an automated, standardized, longitudinal surgical skill assessment and feedback system, and identify baseline trainee (resident and fellow) characteristics associated with achieving proficiency in robotic surgery while learning robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Design, setting, and participants: A quality improvement study assessing a pilot of a surgical experience tracking program was conducted over 1 yr. Participants were six fellows, eight residents, and nine attending surgeons at a tertiary cancer center. Intervention: Trainees underwent baseline self-assessment. After each surgery, an evaluation was completed independently by the trainee and attending surgeons. Performance was rated on a five-point anchored Likert scale (trainees were considered “proficient” when attending surgeons’ rating was ≥4). Technical skills were assessed using the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) and Prostatectomy Assessment and Competency Evaluation (PACE). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Program success and utility were assessed by evaluating completion rates, evaluation completion times, and concordance rates between attending and trainee surgeons, and exit surveys. Baseline characteristics were assessed to determine associations with achieving proficiency. Results and limitations: Completion rates for trainees and attending surgeons were 72% and 77%, respectively. Fellows performed more steps/cases than residents (median [interquartile range]: 5 [3–7] and 3 [2–4], respectively; p < 0.01). Prior completion of robotics or laparoscopic skill courses and surgical experience measures were associated with achieving proficiency in multiple surgical steps and GEARS domains. Interclass correlation coefficients on individual components were 0.27–0.47 on GEARS domains. Conclusions: An automated surgical experience tracker with structured, longitudinal evaluation and feedback can be implemented with good participation and minimal participant time commitment, and can guide curricular development in a proficiency-based education program by identifying modifiable factors associated with proficiency, individualizing education, and identifying improvement areas within the education program. Patient summary: An automated, standardized, longitudinal surgical skill assessment and feedback system can be implemented successfully in surgical education settings and used to inform education plans and predict trainee proficiency.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168324002714EducationLearning curveRobotics
spellingShingle Rand N. Wilcox Vanden Berg
Emily A. Vertosick
Daniel D. Sjoberg
Eugene K. Cha
Jonathan A. Coleman
Timothy F. Donahue
James A. Eastham
Behfar Ehdaie
Vincent P. Laudone
Eugene J. Pietzak
Robert C. Smith
Alvin C. Goh
Implementation and Validation of an Automated, Longitudinal Robotic Surgical Evaluation and Feedback Program at a High-volume Center and Impact on Training
European Urology Open Science
Education
Learning curve
Robotics
title Implementation and Validation of an Automated, Longitudinal Robotic Surgical Evaluation and Feedback Program at a High-volume Center and Impact on Training
title_full Implementation and Validation of an Automated, Longitudinal Robotic Surgical Evaluation and Feedback Program at a High-volume Center and Impact on Training
title_fullStr Implementation and Validation of an Automated, Longitudinal Robotic Surgical Evaluation and Feedback Program at a High-volume Center and Impact on Training
title_full_unstemmed Implementation and Validation of an Automated, Longitudinal Robotic Surgical Evaluation and Feedback Program at a High-volume Center and Impact on Training
title_short Implementation and Validation of an Automated, Longitudinal Robotic Surgical Evaluation and Feedback Program at a High-volume Center and Impact on Training
title_sort implementation and validation of an automated longitudinal robotic surgical evaluation and feedback program at a high volume center and impact on training
topic Education
Learning curve
Robotics
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168324002714
work_keys_str_mv AT randnwilcoxvandenberg implementationandvalidationofanautomatedlongitudinalroboticsurgicalevaluationandfeedbackprogramatahighvolumecenterandimpactontraining
AT emilyavertosick implementationandvalidationofanautomatedlongitudinalroboticsurgicalevaluationandfeedbackprogramatahighvolumecenterandimpactontraining
AT danieldsjoberg implementationandvalidationofanautomatedlongitudinalroboticsurgicalevaluationandfeedbackprogramatahighvolumecenterandimpactontraining
AT eugenekcha implementationandvalidationofanautomatedlongitudinalroboticsurgicalevaluationandfeedbackprogramatahighvolumecenterandimpactontraining
AT jonathanacoleman implementationandvalidationofanautomatedlongitudinalroboticsurgicalevaluationandfeedbackprogramatahighvolumecenterandimpactontraining
AT timothyfdonahue implementationandvalidationofanautomatedlongitudinalroboticsurgicalevaluationandfeedbackprogramatahighvolumecenterandimpactontraining
AT jamesaeastham implementationandvalidationofanautomatedlongitudinalroboticsurgicalevaluationandfeedbackprogramatahighvolumecenterandimpactontraining
AT behfarehdaie implementationandvalidationofanautomatedlongitudinalroboticsurgicalevaluationandfeedbackprogramatahighvolumecenterandimpactontraining
AT vincentplaudone implementationandvalidationofanautomatedlongitudinalroboticsurgicalevaluationandfeedbackprogramatahighvolumecenterandimpactontraining
AT eugenejpietzak implementationandvalidationofanautomatedlongitudinalroboticsurgicalevaluationandfeedbackprogramatahighvolumecenterandimpactontraining
AT robertcsmith implementationandvalidationofanautomatedlongitudinalroboticsurgicalevaluationandfeedbackprogramatahighvolumecenterandimpactontraining
AT alvincgoh implementationandvalidationofanautomatedlongitudinalroboticsurgicalevaluationandfeedbackprogramatahighvolumecenterandimpactontraining