Lakes and rivers as microcosms, version 2.0

Limnology has been greatly influenced by <em>The Lake as a Microcosm</em> (Forbes, 1887), which described a holistic focus on the internal machinations of singular, island-like aquatic ecosystems. I consider three persistent influences of <em>The Lake as a Microcosm</em>: as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: David G. Jenkins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PAGEPress Publications 2013-08-01
Series:Journal of Limnology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jlimnol.it/index.php/jlimnol/article/view/797
_version_ 1818290686344036352
author David G. Jenkins
author_facet David G. Jenkins
author_sort David G. Jenkins
collection DOAJ
description Limnology has been greatly influenced by <em>The Lake as a Microcosm</em> (Forbes, 1887), which described a holistic focus on the internal machinations of singular, island-like aquatic ecosystems. I consider three persistent influences of <em>The Lake as a Microcosm</em>: as an organizing paradigm for the teaching of limnology relative to its practice; the idea that inland waters are like islands, and the replicability of types of inland waters. Based on inspection of recent peer-reviewed literature and 32 limnology texts, we teach limnology according to Forbes but do not practice it in that holistic context. Instead, we practice limnology as aquatic ecology. Based on novel analyses of species-area relationships for 275 inland waters and 392 islands, inland waters are more like continental habitat patches than islands; the island metaphor is poetic but not accurate. Based on a quantitative review of beta diversity (40 data sets representing 10,576 inland waters and 26 data sets representing 1529 terrestrial sites), aquatic systems are no more replicable than are terrestrial systems; a typological approach to limnology is no more justified than it is in terrestrial systems. I conclude that a former distinction between limnology and aquatic ecology no longer applies, and that we should define limnology as the ecology of inland waters. Also, we should not consider lakes and rivers as islands that represent other systems of the same type, but should consider them as open, interactive habitat patches that vary according to their geology and biogeography. I suggest modern limnology operates according to 3 paradigms, which combine to form 3 broad limnological disciplines and establish a basis for a plural, interactive view of lakes and rivers as microcosms. This model of modern limnology may help better connect it to ecology and biogeography and help limnology be even more relevant to science and society.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T02:32:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0818d30622dc4da8aed98a2694994841
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1129-5767
1723-8633
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T02:32:07Z
publishDate 2013-08-01
publisher PAGEPress Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Limnology
spelling doaj.art-0818d30622dc4da8aed98a26949948412022-12-22T00:02:28ZengPAGEPress PublicationsJournal of Limnology1129-57671723-86332013-08-0173s110.4081/jlimnol.2014.797548Lakes and rivers as microcosms, version 2.0David G. Jenkins0University of Central FloridaLimnology has been greatly influenced by <em>The Lake as a Microcosm</em> (Forbes, 1887), which described a holistic focus on the internal machinations of singular, island-like aquatic ecosystems. I consider three persistent influences of <em>The Lake as a Microcosm</em>: as an organizing paradigm for the teaching of limnology relative to its practice; the idea that inland waters are like islands, and the replicability of types of inland waters. Based on inspection of recent peer-reviewed literature and 32 limnology texts, we teach limnology according to Forbes but do not practice it in that holistic context. Instead, we practice limnology as aquatic ecology. Based on novel analyses of species-area relationships for 275 inland waters and 392 islands, inland waters are more like continental habitat patches than islands; the island metaphor is poetic but not accurate. Based on a quantitative review of beta diversity (40 data sets representing 10,576 inland waters and 26 data sets representing 1529 terrestrial sites), aquatic systems are no more replicable than are terrestrial systems; a typological approach to limnology is no more justified than it is in terrestrial systems. I conclude that a former distinction between limnology and aquatic ecology no longer applies, and that we should define limnology as the ecology of inland waters. Also, we should not consider lakes and rivers as islands that represent other systems of the same type, but should consider them as open, interactive habitat patches that vary according to their geology and biogeography. I suggest modern limnology operates according to 3 paradigms, which combine to form 3 broad limnological disciplines and establish a basis for a plural, interactive view of lakes and rivers as microcosms. This model of modern limnology may help better connect it to ecology and biogeography and help limnology be even more relevant to science and society.http://www.jlimnol.it/index.php/jlimnol/article/view/797limnology, aquatic ecology, biogeography, paradigms, species-area relationships, beta diversity
spellingShingle David G. Jenkins
Lakes and rivers as microcosms, version 2.0
Journal of Limnology
limnology, aquatic ecology, biogeography, paradigms, species-area relationships, beta diversity
title Lakes and rivers as microcosms, version 2.0
title_full Lakes and rivers as microcosms, version 2.0
title_fullStr Lakes and rivers as microcosms, version 2.0
title_full_unstemmed Lakes and rivers as microcosms, version 2.0
title_short Lakes and rivers as microcosms, version 2.0
title_sort lakes and rivers as microcosms version 2 0
topic limnology, aquatic ecology, biogeography, paradigms, species-area relationships, beta diversity
url http://www.jlimnol.it/index.php/jlimnol/article/view/797
work_keys_str_mv AT davidgjenkins lakesandriversasmicrocosmsversion20