Indian English Evolution and Focusing Visible Through Power Laws

New dialect emergence and focusing in language contact settings is difficult to capture and date in terms of global structural dialect stabilization. This paper explores whether diachronic power law frequency distributions can provide evidence of dialect evolution and new dialect focusing, by consid...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vineeta Chand, Devin Kapper, Sumona Mondal, Shantanu Sur, Rana D. Parshad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-11-01
Series:Languages
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/2/4/26
_version_ 1798039160460673024
author Vineeta Chand
Devin Kapper
Sumona Mondal
Shantanu Sur
Rana D. Parshad
author_facet Vineeta Chand
Devin Kapper
Sumona Mondal
Shantanu Sur
Rana D. Parshad
author_sort Vineeta Chand
collection DOAJ
description New dialect emergence and focusing in language contact settings is difficult to capture and date in terms of global structural dialect stabilization. This paper explores whether diachronic power law frequency distributions can provide evidence of dialect evolution and new dialect focusing, by considering the quantitative frequency characteristics of three diachronic Indian English (IE) corpora (1970s–2008). The results demonstrate that IE consistently follows power law frequency distributions and the corpora are each best fit by Mandelbrot’s Law. Diachronic changes in the constants are interpreted as evidence of lexical and syntactic collocational focusing within the process of new dialect formation. Evidence of new dialect focusing is also visible through apparent time comparison of spoken and written data. Age and gender-separated sub-corpora of the most recent corpus show minimal deviation, providing apparent time evidence for emerging IE dialect stability. From these findings, we extend the interpretation of diachronic changes in the β coefficient—as indicative of changes in the degree of synthetic/analytic structure—so that β is also sensitive to grammaticalization and changes in collocational patterns.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T21:50:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-08244cf6a6ce4ea6bab581623194d5c9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2226-471X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T21:50:04Z
publishDate 2017-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Languages
spelling doaj.art-08244cf6a6ce4ea6bab581623194d5c92022-12-22T04:01:16ZengMDPI AGLanguages2226-471X2017-11-01242610.3390/languages2040026languages2040026Indian English Evolution and Focusing Visible Through Power LawsVineeta Chand0Devin Kapper1Sumona Mondal2Shantanu Sur3Rana D. Parshad4Centre for Research in Language Development throughout the Lifespan (LaDeLi), Department of Languages and Linguistics, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UKDepartment of Mathematics, Clarkson University, 8 Clarkson Ave., Potsdam, NY 13699-5815, USADepartment of Mathematics, Clarkson University, 8 Clarkson Ave., Potsdam, NY 13699-5815, USADepartment of Biology, Clarkson University, 8 Clarkson Ave., Potsdam, NY 13699-5815, USADepartment of Mathematics, Clarkson University, 8 Clarkson Ave., Potsdam, NY 13699-5815, USANew dialect emergence and focusing in language contact settings is difficult to capture and date in terms of global structural dialect stabilization. This paper explores whether diachronic power law frequency distributions can provide evidence of dialect evolution and new dialect focusing, by considering the quantitative frequency characteristics of three diachronic Indian English (IE) corpora (1970s–2008). The results demonstrate that IE consistently follows power law frequency distributions and the corpora are each best fit by Mandelbrot’s Law. Diachronic changes in the constants are interpreted as evidence of lexical and syntactic collocational focusing within the process of new dialect formation. Evidence of new dialect focusing is also visible through apparent time comparison of spoken and written data. Age and gender-separated sub-corpora of the most recent corpus show minimal deviation, providing apparent time evidence for emerging IE dialect stability. From these findings, we extend the interpretation of diachronic changes in the β coefficient—as indicative of changes in the degree of synthetic/analytic structure—so that β is also sensitive to grammaticalization and changes in collocational patterns.https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/2/4/26language contactpower lawsWorld EnglishIndian Englishdiachroniccorpus linguisticslexical diversitydialect formation
spellingShingle Vineeta Chand
Devin Kapper
Sumona Mondal
Shantanu Sur
Rana D. Parshad
Indian English Evolution and Focusing Visible Through Power Laws
Languages
language contact
power laws
World English
Indian English
diachronic
corpus linguistics
lexical diversity
dialect formation
title Indian English Evolution and Focusing Visible Through Power Laws
title_full Indian English Evolution and Focusing Visible Through Power Laws
title_fullStr Indian English Evolution and Focusing Visible Through Power Laws
title_full_unstemmed Indian English Evolution and Focusing Visible Through Power Laws
title_short Indian English Evolution and Focusing Visible Through Power Laws
title_sort indian english evolution and focusing visible through power laws
topic language contact
power laws
World English
Indian English
diachronic
corpus linguistics
lexical diversity
dialect formation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/2/4/26
work_keys_str_mv AT vineetachand indianenglishevolutionandfocusingvisiblethroughpowerlaws
AT devinkapper indianenglishevolutionandfocusingvisiblethroughpowerlaws
AT sumonamondal indianenglishevolutionandfocusingvisiblethroughpowerlaws
AT shantanusur indianenglishevolutionandfocusingvisiblethroughpowerlaws
AT ranadparshad indianenglishevolutionandfocusingvisiblethroughpowerlaws