Evaluation of the Supporting Mounts of a Three-in-One Electric Drive Unit Using a Hybrid Simulation Model
The 3-in-1 electric drive unit (EDU) has the advantage of increasing the motor size for a larger output, and the reducer can be a compact layout designed to incorporate three key components—the drive motor, inverter, and reducer—into a single main body. This paper explores a hybrid simulation model...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-11-01
|
Series: | Machines |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1702/11/11/1026 |
_version_ | 1797458553655525376 |
---|---|
author | So-Hee Park Chan-Jung Kim Yeonjune Kang |
author_facet | So-Hee Park Chan-Jung Kim Yeonjune Kang |
author_sort | So-Hee Park |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The 3-in-1 electric drive unit (EDU) has the advantage of increasing the motor size for a larger output, and the reducer can be a compact layout designed to incorporate three key components—the drive motor, inverter, and reducer—into a single main body. This paper explores a hybrid simulation model for a 3-in-1 electromechanical drive unit (EDU) and its supporting components, consisting of the gear drive unit (GDU) mount, the motor mount, and the roll rod mounts. The synthesis of these sub-components, including the 3-in-1 EDU itself, the three supporting mount modules, and a rigid-body finite element model, is presented. The dynamics of the 3-in-1 EDU were determined through an experimental modal test. Meanwhile, the dynamic stiffness and damping coefficients of the three supporting mounts were measured using an elastomer tester across a frequency range from 10 Hz to 1000 Hz. To evaluate the sensitivity of each mount, the total spectral responses of the 3-in-1 EDU were compared under a torque input, considering rigid connections for each mount in contrast to their original dynamic stiffness. Through installing a rollrod mount, the optimal rigid connection was identified to control the dynamic response of the 3-in-1 EDU hybrid model. Furthermore, simulation results for the rigid connections in each mount were validated against experimental findings, confirming that the rigid rollrod mount configuration provided the best results. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T16:39:45Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-083d73c5718d4c37857e130c22120654 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2075-1702 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T16:39:45Z |
publishDate | 2023-11-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Machines |
spelling | doaj.art-083d73c5718d4c37857e130c221206542023-11-24T14:53:00ZengMDPI AGMachines2075-17022023-11-011111102610.3390/machines11111026Evaluation of the Supporting Mounts of a Three-in-One Electric Drive Unit Using a Hybrid Simulation ModelSo-Hee Park0Chan-Jung Kim1Yeonjune Kang2Fundamental NVH Technology Cell, Hyundai Mobis, Seoul 06141, Republic of KoreaSchool of Mechanical Design Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of KoreaThe 3-in-1 electric drive unit (EDU) has the advantage of increasing the motor size for a larger output, and the reducer can be a compact layout designed to incorporate three key components—the drive motor, inverter, and reducer—into a single main body. This paper explores a hybrid simulation model for a 3-in-1 electromechanical drive unit (EDU) and its supporting components, consisting of the gear drive unit (GDU) mount, the motor mount, and the roll rod mounts. The synthesis of these sub-components, including the 3-in-1 EDU itself, the three supporting mount modules, and a rigid-body finite element model, is presented. The dynamics of the 3-in-1 EDU were determined through an experimental modal test. Meanwhile, the dynamic stiffness and damping coefficients of the three supporting mounts were measured using an elastomer tester across a frequency range from 10 Hz to 1000 Hz. To evaluate the sensitivity of each mount, the total spectral responses of the 3-in-1 EDU were compared under a torque input, considering rigid connections for each mount in contrast to their original dynamic stiffness. Through installing a rollrod mount, the optimal rigid connection was identified to control the dynamic response of the 3-in-1 EDU hybrid model. Furthermore, simulation results for the rigid connections in each mount were validated against experimental findings, confirming that the rigid rollrod mount configuration provided the best results.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1702/11/11/1026hybrid simulation modelelectric drive unitfrequency response function based sub-structuringsupporting mountdynamic stiffnesspowertrain dynamometer |
spellingShingle | So-Hee Park Chan-Jung Kim Yeonjune Kang Evaluation of the Supporting Mounts of a Three-in-One Electric Drive Unit Using a Hybrid Simulation Model Machines hybrid simulation model electric drive unit frequency response function based sub-structuring supporting mount dynamic stiffness powertrain dynamometer |
title | Evaluation of the Supporting Mounts of a Three-in-One Electric Drive Unit Using a Hybrid Simulation Model |
title_full | Evaluation of the Supporting Mounts of a Three-in-One Electric Drive Unit Using a Hybrid Simulation Model |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Supporting Mounts of a Three-in-One Electric Drive Unit Using a Hybrid Simulation Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Supporting Mounts of a Three-in-One Electric Drive Unit Using a Hybrid Simulation Model |
title_short | Evaluation of the Supporting Mounts of a Three-in-One Electric Drive Unit Using a Hybrid Simulation Model |
title_sort | evaluation of the supporting mounts of a three in one electric drive unit using a hybrid simulation model |
topic | hybrid simulation model electric drive unit frequency response function based sub-structuring supporting mount dynamic stiffness powertrain dynamometer |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1702/11/11/1026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soheepark evaluationofthesupportingmountsofathreeinoneelectricdriveunitusingahybridsimulationmodel AT chanjungkim evaluationofthesupportingmountsofathreeinoneelectricdriveunitusingahybridsimulationmodel AT yeonjunekang evaluationofthesupportingmountsofathreeinoneelectricdriveunitusingahybridsimulationmodel |