The Russian invasion of Ukraine selectively depolarized the Finnish NATO discussion on Twitter
Abstract It is often thought that an external threat increases the internal cohesion of a nation, and thus decreases polarization. We examine this proposition by analyzing NATO discussion dynamics on Finnish social media following the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. In Finland, public...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SpringerOpen
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | EPJ Data Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00441-2 |
| _version_ | 1797363482357661696 |
|---|---|
| author | Yan Xia Antti Gronow Arttu Malkamäki Tuomas Ylä-Anttila Barbara Keller Mikko Kivelä |
| author_facet | Yan Xia Antti Gronow Arttu Malkamäki Tuomas Ylä-Anttila Barbara Keller Mikko Kivelä |
| author_sort | Yan Xia |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract It is often thought that an external threat increases the internal cohesion of a nation, and thus decreases polarization. We examine this proposition by analyzing NATO discussion dynamics on Finnish social media following the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. In Finland, public opinion on joining the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) had long been polarized along the left-right partisan axis, but the invasion led to a rapid convergence of opinion toward joining NATO. We investigate whether and how this depolarization took place among polarized actors on Finnish Twitter. By analyzing retweet patterns, we find three separate user groups before the invasion: a pro-NATO, a left-wing anti-NATO, and a conspiracy-charged anti-NATO group. After the invasion, the left-wing anti-NATO group members broke out of their retweeting bubble and connected with the pro-NATO group despite their difference in partisanship, while the conspiracy-charged anti-NATO group mostly remained a separate cluster. Our content analysis reveals that the left-wing anti-NATO group and the pro-NATO group were bridged by a shared condemnation of Russia’s actions and shared democratic norms, while the other anti-NATO group, mainly built around conspiracy theories and disinformation, consistently demonstrated a clear anti-NATO attitude. We show that an external threat can bridge partisan divides in issues linked to the threat, but bubbles upheld by conspiracy theories and disinformation may persist even under dramatic external threats. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T16:21:59Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-08578d905c774910b69752d4a75eb7f3 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2193-1127 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T16:21:59Z |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | SpringerOpen |
| record_format | Article |
| series | EPJ Data Science |
| spelling | doaj.art-08578d905c774910b69752d4a75eb7f32024-01-07T12:15:54ZengSpringerOpenEPJ Data Science2193-11272024-01-0113111210.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00441-2The Russian invasion of Ukraine selectively depolarized the Finnish NATO discussion on TwitterYan Xia0Antti Gronow1Arttu Malkamäki2Tuomas Ylä-Anttila3Barbara Keller4Mikko Kivelä5Department of Computer Science, Aalto UniversityFaculty of Social Sciences, University of HelsinkiFaculty of Social Sciences, University of HelsinkiFaculty of Social Sciences, University of HelsinkiDepartment of Computer Science, Aalto UniversityDepartment of Computer Science, Aalto UniversityAbstract It is often thought that an external threat increases the internal cohesion of a nation, and thus decreases polarization. We examine this proposition by analyzing NATO discussion dynamics on Finnish social media following the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. In Finland, public opinion on joining the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) had long been polarized along the left-right partisan axis, but the invasion led to a rapid convergence of opinion toward joining NATO. We investigate whether and how this depolarization took place among polarized actors on Finnish Twitter. By analyzing retweet patterns, we find three separate user groups before the invasion: a pro-NATO, a left-wing anti-NATO, and a conspiracy-charged anti-NATO group. After the invasion, the left-wing anti-NATO group members broke out of their retweeting bubble and connected with the pro-NATO group despite their difference in partisanship, while the conspiracy-charged anti-NATO group mostly remained a separate cluster. Our content analysis reveals that the left-wing anti-NATO group and the pro-NATO group were bridged by a shared condemnation of Russia’s actions and shared democratic norms, while the other anti-NATO group, mainly built around conspiracy theories and disinformation, consistently demonstrated a clear anti-NATO attitude. We show that an external threat can bridge partisan divides in issues linked to the threat, but bubbles upheld by conspiracy theories and disinformation may persist even under dramatic external threats.https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00441-2Political polarizationSocial mediaExternal threatConspiracy theoryDisinformation |
| spellingShingle | Yan Xia Antti Gronow Arttu Malkamäki Tuomas Ylä-Anttila Barbara Keller Mikko Kivelä The Russian invasion of Ukraine selectively depolarized the Finnish NATO discussion on Twitter EPJ Data Science Political polarization Social media External threat Conspiracy theory Disinformation |
| title | The Russian invasion of Ukraine selectively depolarized the Finnish NATO discussion on Twitter |
| title_full | The Russian invasion of Ukraine selectively depolarized the Finnish NATO discussion on Twitter |
| title_fullStr | The Russian invasion of Ukraine selectively depolarized the Finnish NATO discussion on Twitter |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Russian invasion of Ukraine selectively depolarized the Finnish NATO discussion on Twitter |
| title_short | The Russian invasion of Ukraine selectively depolarized the Finnish NATO discussion on Twitter |
| title_sort | russian invasion of ukraine selectively depolarized the finnish nato discussion on twitter |
| topic | Political polarization Social media External threat Conspiracy theory Disinformation |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00441-2 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yanxia therussianinvasionofukraineselectivelydepolarizedthefinnishnatodiscussionontwitter AT anttigronow therussianinvasionofukraineselectivelydepolarizedthefinnishnatodiscussionontwitter AT arttumalkamaki therussianinvasionofukraineselectivelydepolarizedthefinnishnatodiscussionontwitter AT tuomasylaanttila therussianinvasionofukraineselectivelydepolarizedthefinnishnatodiscussionontwitter AT barbarakeller therussianinvasionofukraineselectivelydepolarizedthefinnishnatodiscussionontwitter AT mikkokivela therussianinvasionofukraineselectivelydepolarizedthefinnishnatodiscussionontwitter AT yanxia russianinvasionofukraineselectivelydepolarizedthefinnishnatodiscussionontwitter AT anttigronow russianinvasionofukraineselectivelydepolarizedthefinnishnatodiscussionontwitter AT arttumalkamaki russianinvasionofukraineselectivelydepolarizedthefinnishnatodiscussionontwitter AT tuomasylaanttila russianinvasionofukraineselectivelydepolarizedthefinnishnatodiscussionontwitter AT barbarakeller russianinvasionofukraineselectivelydepolarizedthefinnishnatodiscussionontwitter AT mikkokivela russianinvasionofukraineselectivelydepolarizedthefinnishnatodiscussionontwitter |