Architectures of adaptive integration in large collaborative projects
Collaborations to address complex societal problems associated with managing human-natural systems often require large teams comprised of scientists from multiple disciplines. For many such problems, large-scale, transdisciplinary projects whose members include scientists, stakeholders, and other pr...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Resilience Alliance
2015-12-01
|
Series: | Ecology and Society |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol20/iss4/art5/ |
_version_ | 1818695889548476416 |
---|---|
author | Lois Wright Morton Sanford D. Eigenbrode Timothy A. Martin |
author_facet | Lois Wright Morton Sanford D. Eigenbrode Timothy A. Martin |
author_sort | Lois Wright Morton |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Collaborations to address complex societal problems associated with managing human-natural systems often require large teams comprised of scientists from multiple disciplines. For many such problems, large-scale, transdisciplinary projects whose members include scientists, stakeholders, and other professionals are necessary. The success of very large, transdisciplinary projects can be facilitated by attending to the diversity of types of collaboration that inevitably occur within them. As projects progress and evolve, the resulting dynamic collaborative heterogeneity within them constitutes architectures of adaptive integration (AAI). Management that acknowledges this dynamic and fosters and promotes awareness of it within a project can better facilitate the creativity and innovation required to address problems from a systems perspective. In successful large projects, AAI (1) functionally meets objectives and goals, (2) uses disciplinary expertise and concurrently bridges many disciplines, (3) has mechanisms to enable connection, (4) delineates boundaries to keep focus but retain flexibility, (5) continuously monitors and adapts, and (6) encourages project-wide awareness. These principles are illustrated using as case studies three large climate change and agriculture projects funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture-National Institute of Food and Agriculture. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-17T13:52:39Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-086a52192a9d44e7bf41480c08a73cc8 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1708-3087 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-17T13:52:39Z |
publishDate | 2015-12-01 |
publisher | Resilience Alliance |
record_format | Article |
series | Ecology and Society |
spelling | doaj.art-086a52192a9d44e7bf41480c08a73cc82022-12-21T21:46:00ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872015-12-01204510.5751/ES-07788-2004057788Architectures of adaptive integration in large collaborative projectsLois Wright Morton0Sanford D. Eigenbrode1Timothy A. Martin2Department of Sociology, Iowa State UniversityDepartment of Plant, Soil and Entomological Sciences, University of IdahoUniversity of FloridaCollaborations to address complex societal problems associated with managing human-natural systems often require large teams comprised of scientists from multiple disciplines. For many such problems, large-scale, transdisciplinary projects whose members include scientists, stakeholders, and other professionals are necessary. The success of very large, transdisciplinary projects can be facilitated by attending to the diversity of types of collaboration that inevitably occur within them. As projects progress and evolve, the resulting dynamic collaborative heterogeneity within them constitutes architectures of adaptive integration (AAI). Management that acknowledges this dynamic and fosters and promotes awareness of it within a project can better facilitate the creativity and innovation required to address problems from a systems perspective. In successful large projects, AAI (1) functionally meets objectives and goals, (2) uses disciplinary expertise and concurrently bridges many disciplines, (3) has mechanisms to enable connection, (4) delineates boundaries to keep focus but retain flexibility, (5) continuously monitors and adapts, and (6) encourages project-wide awareness. These principles are illustrated using as case studies three large climate change and agriculture projects funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture-National Institute of Food and Agriculture.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol20/iss4/art5/architectures of adaptive integrationcollaborative scienceteam science |
spellingShingle | Lois Wright Morton Sanford D. Eigenbrode Timothy A. Martin Architectures of adaptive integration in large collaborative projects Ecology and Society architectures of adaptive integration collaborative science team science |
title | Architectures of adaptive integration in large collaborative projects |
title_full | Architectures of adaptive integration in large collaborative projects |
title_fullStr | Architectures of adaptive integration in large collaborative projects |
title_full_unstemmed | Architectures of adaptive integration in large collaborative projects |
title_short | Architectures of adaptive integration in large collaborative projects |
title_sort | architectures of adaptive integration in large collaborative projects |
topic | architectures of adaptive integration collaborative science team science |
url | http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol20/iss4/art5/ |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loiswrightmorton architecturesofadaptiveintegrationinlargecollaborativeprojects AT sanforddeigenbrode architecturesofadaptiveintegrationinlargecollaborativeprojects AT timothyamartin architecturesofadaptiveintegrationinlargecollaborativeprojects |