The Effect of Intraocular Pressure Load Boundary on the Biomechanics of the Human Conventional Aqueous Outflow Pathway
Background: Aqueous humor outflow resistance in the trabecular meshwork (TM), juxtacanalicular connective tissue (JCT), and Schlemm’s canal (SC) endothelium of the conventional outflow pathway actively contribute to intraocular pressure (IOP) regulation. Outflow resistance is actively affected by th...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-11-01
|
Series: | Bioengineering |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/9/11/672 |
_version_ | 1797469038631190528 |
---|---|
author | Alireza Karimi Reza Razaghi Seyed Mohammadali Rahmati J. Crawford Downs Ted S. Acott Mary J. Kelley Ruikang K. Wang Murray Johnstone |
author_facet | Alireza Karimi Reza Razaghi Seyed Mohammadali Rahmati J. Crawford Downs Ted S. Acott Mary J. Kelley Ruikang K. Wang Murray Johnstone |
author_sort | Alireza Karimi |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: Aqueous humor outflow resistance in the trabecular meshwork (TM), juxtacanalicular connective tissue (JCT), and Schlemm’s canal (SC) endothelium of the conventional outflow pathway actively contribute to intraocular pressure (IOP) regulation. Outflow resistance is actively affected by the dynamic outflow pressure gradient across the TM, JCT, and SC inner wall tissues. The resistance effect implies the presence of a fluid–structure interaction (FSI) coupling between the outflow tissues and the aqueous humor. However, the biomechanical interactions between viscoelastic outflow tissues and aqueous humor dynamics are largely unknown. Methods: A 3D microstructural finite element (FE) model of a healthy human eye TM/JCT/SC complex was constructed with elastic and viscoelastic material properties for the bulk extracellular matrix and embedded elastic cable elements. The FE models were subjected to both idealized and a physiologic IOP load boundary using the FSI method. Results: The elastic material model for both the idealized and physiologic IOP load boundary at equal IOPs showed similar stresses and strains in the outflow tissues as well as pressure in the aqueous humor. However, outflow tissues with viscoelastic material properties were sensitive to the IOP load rate, resulting in different mechanical and hydrodynamic responses in the tissues and aqueous humor. Conclusions: Transient IOP fluctuations may cause a relatively large IOP difference of ~20 mmHg in a very short time frame of ~0.1 s, resulting in a rate stiffening in the outflow tissues. Rate stiffening reduces strains and causes a rate-dependent pressure gradient across the outflow tissues. Thus, the results suggest it is necessary to use a viscoelastic material model in outflow tissues that includes the important role of IOP load rate. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T19:15:47Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-086c1b2f973941c691d204e632894c3c |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2306-5354 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T19:15:47Z |
publishDate | 2022-11-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Bioengineering |
spelling | doaj.art-086c1b2f973941c691d204e632894c3c2023-11-24T03:47:06ZengMDPI AGBioengineering2306-53542022-11-0191167210.3390/bioengineering9110672The Effect of Intraocular Pressure Load Boundary on the Biomechanics of the Human Conventional Aqueous Outflow PathwayAlireza Karimi0Reza Razaghi1Seyed Mohammadali Rahmati2J. Crawford Downs3Ted S. Acott4Mary J. Kelley5Ruikang K. Wang6Murray Johnstone7Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USADepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USASchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USADepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USADepartments of Ophthalmology and Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USADepartments of Ophthalmology and Integrative Biosciences, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USADepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USADepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USABackground: Aqueous humor outflow resistance in the trabecular meshwork (TM), juxtacanalicular connective tissue (JCT), and Schlemm’s canal (SC) endothelium of the conventional outflow pathway actively contribute to intraocular pressure (IOP) regulation. Outflow resistance is actively affected by the dynamic outflow pressure gradient across the TM, JCT, and SC inner wall tissues. The resistance effect implies the presence of a fluid–structure interaction (FSI) coupling between the outflow tissues and the aqueous humor. However, the biomechanical interactions between viscoelastic outflow tissues and aqueous humor dynamics are largely unknown. Methods: A 3D microstructural finite element (FE) model of a healthy human eye TM/JCT/SC complex was constructed with elastic and viscoelastic material properties for the bulk extracellular matrix and embedded elastic cable elements. The FE models were subjected to both idealized and a physiologic IOP load boundary using the FSI method. Results: The elastic material model for both the idealized and physiologic IOP load boundary at equal IOPs showed similar stresses and strains in the outflow tissues as well as pressure in the aqueous humor. However, outflow tissues with viscoelastic material properties were sensitive to the IOP load rate, resulting in different mechanical and hydrodynamic responses in the tissues and aqueous humor. Conclusions: Transient IOP fluctuations may cause a relatively large IOP difference of ~20 mmHg in a very short time frame of ~0.1 s, resulting in a rate stiffening in the outflow tissues. Rate stiffening reduces strains and causes a rate-dependent pressure gradient across the outflow tissues. Thus, the results suggest it is necessary to use a viscoelastic material model in outflow tissues that includes the important role of IOP load rate.https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/9/11/672trabecular meshworkjuxtacanalicular tissueSchlemm’s canalviscoelastic material modeltransient IOP fluctuationsfluid–structure interaction |
spellingShingle | Alireza Karimi Reza Razaghi Seyed Mohammadali Rahmati J. Crawford Downs Ted S. Acott Mary J. Kelley Ruikang K. Wang Murray Johnstone The Effect of Intraocular Pressure Load Boundary on the Biomechanics of the Human Conventional Aqueous Outflow Pathway Bioengineering trabecular meshwork juxtacanalicular tissue Schlemm’s canal viscoelastic material model transient IOP fluctuations fluid–structure interaction |
title | The Effect of Intraocular Pressure Load Boundary on the Biomechanics of the Human Conventional Aqueous Outflow Pathway |
title_full | The Effect of Intraocular Pressure Load Boundary on the Biomechanics of the Human Conventional Aqueous Outflow Pathway |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Intraocular Pressure Load Boundary on the Biomechanics of the Human Conventional Aqueous Outflow Pathway |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Intraocular Pressure Load Boundary on the Biomechanics of the Human Conventional Aqueous Outflow Pathway |
title_short | The Effect of Intraocular Pressure Load Boundary on the Biomechanics of the Human Conventional Aqueous Outflow Pathway |
title_sort | effect of intraocular pressure load boundary on the biomechanics of the human conventional aqueous outflow pathway |
topic | trabecular meshwork juxtacanalicular tissue Schlemm’s canal viscoelastic material model transient IOP fluctuations fluid–structure interaction |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/9/11/672 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alirezakarimi theeffectofintraocularpressureloadboundaryonthebiomechanicsofthehumanconventionalaqueousoutflowpathway AT rezarazaghi theeffectofintraocularpressureloadboundaryonthebiomechanicsofthehumanconventionalaqueousoutflowpathway AT seyedmohammadalirahmati theeffectofintraocularpressureloadboundaryonthebiomechanicsofthehumanconventionalaqueousoutflowpathway AT jcrawforddowns theeffectofintraocularpressureloadboundaryonthebiomechanicsofthehumanconventionalaqueousoutflowpathway AT tedsacott theeffectofintraocularpressureloadboundaryonthebiomechanicsofthehumanconventionalaqueousoutflowpathway AT maryjkelley theeffectofintraocularpressureloadboundaryonthebiomechanicsofthehumanconventionalaqueousoutflowpathway AT ruikangkwang theeffectofintraocularpressureloadboundaryonthebiomechanicsofthehumanconventionalaqueousoutflowpathway AT murrayjohnstone theeffectofintraocularpressureloadboundaryonthebiomechanicsofthehumanconventionalaqueousoutflowpathway AT alirezakarimi effectofintraocularpressureloadboundaryonthebiomechanicsofthehumanconventionalaqueousoutflowpathway AT rezarazaghi effectofintraocularpressureloadboundaryonthebiomechanicsofthehumanconventionalaqueousoutflowpathway AT seyedmohammadalirahmati effectofintraocularpressureloadboundaryonthebiomechanicsofthehumanconventionalaqueousoutflowpathway AT jcrawforddowns effectofintraocularpressureloadboundaryonthebiomechanicsofthehumanconventionalaqueousoutflowpathway AT tedsacott effectofintraocularpressureloadboundaryonthebiomechanicsofthehumanconventionalaqueousoutflowpathway AT maryjkelley effectofintraocularpressureloadboundaryonthebiomechanicsofthehumanconventionalaqueousoutflowpathway AT ruikangkwang effectofintraocularpressureloadboundaryonthebiomechanicsofthehumanconventionalaqueousoutflowpathway AT murrayjohnstone effectofintraocularpressureloadboundaryonthebiomechanicsofthehumanconventionalaqueousoutflowpathway |