Internal validation and evaluation of the predictive performance of models based on the PRISM-3 (Pediatric Risk of Mortality) and PIM-3 (Pediatric Index of Mortality) scoring systems for predicting mortality in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs)

Abstract Purpose The study was aimed to assess the prognostic power The Pediatric Risk of Mortality-3 (PRISM-3) and the Pediatric Index of Mortality-3 (PIM-3) to predict in-hospital mortality in a sample of patients admitted to the PICUs. Design and methods The study was performed to include all chi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zahra Rahmatinejad, Fatemeh Rahmatinejad, Majid Sezavar, Fariba Tohidinezhad, Ameen Abu-Hanna, Saeid Eslami
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-04-01
Series:BMC Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03228-y
_version_ 1818022749577150464
author Zahra Rahmatinejad
Fatemeh Rahmatinejad
Majid Sezavar
Fariba Tohidinezhad
Ameen Abu-Hanna
Saeid Eslami
author_facet Zahra Rahmatinejad
Fatemeh Rahmatinejad
Majid Sezavar
Fariba Tohidinezhad
Ameen Abu-Hanna
Saeid Eslami
author_sort Zahra Rahmatinejad
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Purpose The study was aimed to assess the prognostic power The Pediatric Risk of Mortality-3 (PRISM-3) and the Pediatric Index of Mortality-3 (PIM-3) to predict in-hospital mortality in a sample of patients admitted to the PICUs. Design and methods The study was performed to include all children younger than 18 years of age admitted to receive critical care in two hospitals, Mashhad, northeast of Iran from December 2017 to November 2018. The predictive performance was quantified in terms of the overall performance by measuring the Brier Score (BS) and standardized mortality ratio (SMR), discrimination by assessing the AUC, and calibration by applying the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Results A total of 2446 patients with the median age of 4.2 months (56% male) were included in the study. The PICU and in-hospital mortality were 12.4 and 16.14%, respectively. The BS of the PRISM-3 and PIM-3 was 0.088 and 0.093 for PICU mortality and 0.108 and 0.113 for in-hospital mortality. For the entire sample, the SMR of the PRISM-3 and PIM-3 were 1.34 and 1.37 for PICU mortality and 1.73 and 1.78 for in-hospital mortality, respectively. The PRISM-3 demonstrated significantly higher discrimination power in comparison with the PIM-3 (AUC = 0.829 vs 0.745) for in-hospital mortality. (AUC = 0.779 vs 0.739) for in-hospital mortality. The HL test revealed poor calibration for both models in both outcomes. Conclusions The performance measures of PRISM-3 were better than PIM-3 in both PICU and in-hospital mortality. However, further recalibration and modification studies are required to improve the predictive power to a clinically acceptable level before daily clinical use. Practice implications The calibration of the PRISM-3 model is more satisfactory than PIM-3, however both models have fair discrimination power.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T03:33:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-086c87e767144ff686a0c4a59fb3ea47
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2431
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T03:33:22Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pediatrics
spelling doaj.art-086c87e767144ff686a0c4a59fb3ea472022-12-22T02:03:46ZengBMCBMC Pediatrics1471-24312022-04-0122111710.1186/s12887-022-03228-yInternal validation and evaluation of the predictive performance of models based on the PRISM-3 (Pediatric Risk of Mortality) and PIM-3 (Pediatric Index of Mortality) scoring systems for predicting mortality in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs)Zahra Rahmatinejad0Fatemeh Rahmatinejad1Majid Sezavar2Fariba Tohidinezhad3Ameen Abu-Hanna4Saeid Eslami5Department of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical SciencesDepartment of Medical Records and Health Information Technology, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical SciencesPediatric Intensive Care, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical SciencesDepartment of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical SciencesDepartment of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC - Location AMC, University of AmsterdamDepartment of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical SciencesAbstract Purpose The study was aimed to assess the prognostic power The Pediatric Risk of Mortality-3 (PRISM-3) and the Pediatric Index of Mortality-3 (PIM-3) to predict in-hospital mortality in a sample of patients admitted to the PICUs. Design and methods The study was performed to include all children younger than 18 years of age admitted to receive critical care in two hospitals, Mashhad, northeast of Iran from December 2017 to November 2018. The predictive performance was quantified in terms of the overall performance by measuring the Brier Score (BS) and standardized mortality ratio (SMR), discrimination by assessing the AUC, and calibration by applying the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Results A total of 2446 patients with the median age of 4.2 months (56% male) were included in the study. The PICU and in-hospital mortality were 12.4 and 16.14%, respectively. The BS of the PRISM-3 and PIM-3 was 0.088 and 0.093 for PICU mortality and 0.108 and 0.113 for in-hospital mortality. For the entire sample, the SMR of the PRISM-3 and PIM-3 were 1.34 and 1.37 for PICU mortality and 1.73 and 1.78 for in-hospital mortality, respectively. The PRISM-3 demonstrated significantly higher discrimination power in comparison with the PIM-3 (AUC = 0.829 vs 0.745) for in-hospital mortality. (AUC = 0.779 vs 0.739) for in-hospital mortality. The HL test revealed poor calibration for both models in both outcomes. Conclusions The performance measures of PRISM-3 were better than PIM-3 in both PICU and in-hospital mortality. However, further recalibration and modification studies are required to improve the predictive power to a clinically acceptable level before daily clinical use. Practice implications The calibration of the PRISM-3 model is more satisfactory than PIM-3, however both models have fair discrimination power.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03228-yScoring systemPRISMPIMMortality
spellingShingle Zahra Rahmatinejad
Fatemeh Rahmatinejad
Majid Sezavar
Fariba Tohidinezhad
Ameen Abu-Hanna
Saeid Eslami
Internal validation and evaluation of the predictive performance of models based on the PRISM-3 (Pediatric Risk of Mortality) and PIM-3 (Pediatric Index of Mortality) scoring systems for predicting mortality in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs)
BMC Pediatrics
Scoring system
PRISM
PIM
Mortality
title Internal validation and evaluation of the predictive performance of models based on the PRISM-3 (Pediatric Risk of Mortality) and PIM-3 (Pediatric Index of Mortality) scoring systems for predicting mortality in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs)
title_full Internal validation and evaluation of the predictive performance of models based on the PRISM-3 (Pediatric Risk of Mortality) and PIM-3 (Pediatric Index of Mortality) scoring systems for predicting mortality in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs)
title_fullStr Internal validation and evaluation of the predictive performance of models based on the PRISM-3 (Pediatric Risk of Mortality) and PIM-3 (Pediatric Index of Mortality) scoring systems for predicting mortality in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs)
title_full_unstemmed Internal validation and evaluation of the predictive performance of models based on the PRISM-3 (Pediatric Risk of Mortality) and PIM-3 (Pediatric Index of Mortality) scoring systems for predicting mortality in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs)
title_short Internal validation and evaluation of the predictive performance of models based on the PRISM-3 (Pediatric Risk of Mortality) and PIM-3 (Pediatric Index of Mortality) scoring systems for predicting mortality in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs)
title_sort internal validation and evaluation of the predictive performance of models based on the prism 3 pediatric risk of mortality and pim 3 pediatric index of mortality scoring systems for predicting mortality in pediatric intensive care units picus
topic Scoring system
PRISM
PIM
Mortality
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03228-y
work_keys_str_mv AT zahrarahmatinejad internalvalidationandevaluationofthepredictiveperformanceofmodelsbasedontheprism3pediatricriskofmortalityandpim3pediatricindexofmortalityscoringsystemsforpredictingmortalityinpediatricintensivecareunitspicus
AT fatemehrahmatinejad internalvalidationandevaluationofthepredictiveperformanceofmodelsbasedontheprism3pediatricriskofmortalityandpim3pediatricindexofmortalityscoringsystemsforpredictingmortalityinpediatricintensivecareunitspicus
AT majidsezavar internalvalidationandevaluationofthepredictiveperformanceofmodelsbasedontheprism3pediatricriskofmortalityandpim3pediatricindexofmortalityscoringsystemsforpredictingmortalityinpediatricintensivecareunitspicus
AT faribatohidinezhad internalvalidationandevaluationofthepredictiveperformanceofmodelsbasedontheprism3pediatricriskofmortalityandpim3pediatricindexofmortalityscoringsystemsforpredictingmortalityinpediatricintensivecareunitspicus
AT ameenabuhanna internalvalidationandevaluationofthepredictiveperformanceofmodelsbasedontheprism3pediatricriskofmortalityandpim3pediatricindexofmortalityscoringsystemsforpredictingmortalityinpediatricintensivecareunitspicus
AT saeideslami internalvalidationandevaluationofthepredictiveperformanceofmodelsbasedontheprism3pediatricriskofmortalityandpim3pediatricindexofmortalityscoringsystemsforpredictingmortalityinpediatricintensivecareunitspicus